Oxidation of Threonylmethionine by Peroxynitrite
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 119, No. 20, 1997 4755
-
Met]:[peroxynitrite] ) 2:1, facet,PN decreased whereas fThr-Met(O),PN
increased. This feature of facet,PN is different from the efficiency
of photochemical acetaldehyde formation, facet,photo, where
increasing concentrations of Thr-Met promoted no (at pH 6.0)
or even a slight increase (at pH 7.4) of facet,photo (see Table 1,
column 5), and bears important mechanistic information (see
the Discussion). We note that at concentrations of [Thr-Met]
formation of an adduct between ONOO and CO240 (present
-
+
through the equilibrium HCO3 + H h H2O + CO2) in
competition with the reaction of peroxynitrite with Thr-Met.
Potential structures of such adducts between peroxynitrite and
40,41
CO2 have been proposed
but not experimentally confirmed.
Formation of Methional from Met and Thr-Met. As
displayed in reactions 3, 5, and 6, methional is a stable molecular
product originating from the 1e oxidation of Met. One potential
mechanistic problem associated with the formation of ethylene
from Met is the fact that ethylene may result not only from a
direct decomposition of a Met-derived intermediate but also
from further oxidation of methional, a product of the decom-
position of 1. Here, we have included experimental evidence
that methional is, in fact, a product from the reaction of
peroxynitrite with Met. We reacted different concentrations of
-
3
<
1.0 × 10 M, ∑prod,PN < 1.0. This suggests that at lower
concentrations of Thr-Met peroxynitrite may react via additional
channels with Thr-Met, possibly via hydrogen abstraction. In
fact, MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis of our reactions
indicated products with molecular masses corresponding to
either MW(TM) + MW(NO) or MW(TM) + MW(O2) - 2MW-
(H) and MW(TM) + MW(NO3) (TM ) Thr-Met) which remain
to be characterized. However, this detail does not affect our
calculations of the efficiency of 1e oxidation of Thr-Met by
peroxynitrite, determined by measurement of acetaldehyde, since
we have provided a reference value for every concentration of
Thr-Met by measurement of the photochemical efficiency of
acetaldehyde formation, facet,photo (see also the Discussion). In
control experiments we confirmed that acetaldehyde was not a
substrate for peroxynitrite under our reaction conditions. In a
-
3
-4
-4
Met (1 × 10 , 5 × 10 , 1.75 × 10 M) with peroxynitrite
-2
at ratios of [Met]:[peroxynitrite] ) 2:1 in 2 × 10 M phosphate
buffer, pH 7.4, similarly to the experimental system described
-
3
for Thr-Met (see above). The exposure of 1 × 10 M Met to
-
4
-4
5 × 10 M peroxynitrite resulted in the loss of 3.3 × 10
M
-5
Met, accompanied by the formation of 2.0 × 10 M methional.
Thus, the efficiency for methional formation by peroxynitrite,
fmethional,PN ) [methional]/[loss of Met] corresponds to fmethional,PN
) 0.062. With decreasing concentrations of Met, fmethional,PN
-
5
typical experiment the reaction of 8.75 × 10 M peroxynitrite
with 1.75 × 10 M Thr-Met yielded 1.4 × 10 M acetalde-
hyde at pH 7.4. When a solution containing 1.75 × 10
Thr-Met and 9 × 10 M acetaldehyde was reacted with 8.75
10 M peroxynitrite, the final concentration of acetaldehyde
-
4
-6
-
4
-4
M
increased to fmethional,PN ) 0.15 for 5 × 10 M Met and
-
6
-4
fmethional,PN ) 0.31 for 1.75 × 10 M Met. Thus, in particular
-5
×
at lower Met concentrations methional accounts for a significant
fraction (up to 31%) of the products formed during the oxidation
of Met by peroxynitrite. When we exposed Thr-Met to
peroxynitrite, there was no formation of methional at all
-
5
after completion of the reaction was 1.04 × 10 M, i.e., an
amount corresponding to the sum of initially added acetaldehyde
and the yield of acetaldehyde expected on the basis of an
exclusive reaction of peroxynitrite with Thr-Met even in the
presence of acetaldehyde.
-
4
-4
concentrations of Thr-Met, 1.75 × 10 , 5 × 10 , and 1 ×
-
3
1
0
M.
When 1.75 × 10-4 M Thr-Met was oxidized by 8.75 × 10
-5
-
3
-2
Discussion
M peroxynitrite in the presence of 3.5 × 10 or 1.75 × 10
M methanol, there was only a 10% or 20% decrease of facet,PN,
Quantification of the 1e Oxidation of Thr-Met by Peroxy-
nitrite. Scheme 1 displays two potential pathways according
to which sulfide radical cations from Thr-Met produce acetal-
dehyde, (i) the formation of 5 (reactions 8 and 9) with
subsequent conversion to 6 (reaction 10) or (ii) the deprotonation
of the N-terminal amino group of 3 or 4 (reactions 14 and 15)
to allow direct formation of 6 (reaction 16). We note, however,
that acetaldehyde formation is only one possible pathway of
the decomposition of threonylmethionine sulfide radical cations.
Competing pathways include deprotonation in the R-position
to the sulfur such as shown in reactions 22 and 23 (Scheme 2).
In general, these deprotonation pathways are more efficient at
respectively. This result indicates that acetaldehyde is not the
•
product of a reaction of free hydroxyl radicals (HO ) with Thr-
Met in the peroxynitrite system. Initially, it had been suggested
that hydroxyl radicals may be generated by homolytic cleavage
of peroxynitrite (reaction 28),35 but both theoretical and
1
•
•
ONOOH f HO + NO
(28)
2
experimental36,37 evidence against such a reaction has now been
presented. If free hydroxyl radicals would have been responsible
for acetaldehyde formation from Thr-Met in our systems,
4
2
-
3
higher pH and lower sulfide concentrations. This fact may
rationalize our result that photochemical acetaldehyde formation
methanol would have reduced facet,PN by 66% (3.5 × 10
methanol) and 91% (1.75 × 10 M methanol), respectively,
on the basis of k(HO +Thr-Met) ≈ 9.8 × 10 M and
k(HO +CH3OH) ) 9.7 × 10 M s .
In the presence of a physiological concentration of 2.5 ×
M HCO3 , the product yields were significantly changed
Table 1, entry 7), as we observed significantly higher values
M
-
2
-
4
•
9
-1 -1 38
at pH 7.4 was less efficient for 1.75 × 10 M Thr-Met as
s
-4 -3
•
8
-1 -1 39
compared to 5 × 10 and 1 × 10 M Thr-Met. However,
the pathways leading to acetaldehyde also benefit from higher
pH, rationalizing why acetaldehyde formation was generally
more efficient at pH 7.4 as compared to pH 6.0. A quantitative
prediction of acetaldehyde formation as a function of pH and
Thr-Met concentration is currently not possible as not all rate
constants for the individual (competing) processes are known.
However, a semiempirical approach allows this prediction. We
have measured the primary yields of sulfide radical cations,
-
2
-
1
0
(
for facet,PN but significantly lower values for fThr-Met(O),PN.
Mechanistically, these features can be rationalized by the rapid
(
35) Beckman, J. S.; Beckman, T. W.; Chen, J.; Marshall, P. A.; Freeman,
B. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1990, 87, 1620-1624.
36) (a) Lemercier, J.-N.; Squadrito, G. L.; Pryor, W. A. Arch. Biochem.
(
Biophys. 1995, 321, 31. (b) Pryor, W. A.; Jin, X.; Squadrito, G. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3125.
(40) Lymar, S. V.; Hurst, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8867.
Lymar, S. V.; Jiang, Q.; Hurst, J. K. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 7855. Uppu,
R. M.; Squadrito, G. L.; Pryor, W. A. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1996, 327,
335.
(41) Houk, K. N.; Condroski, K. R.; Pryor, W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 13002.
(
37) Goldstein, S.; Squadrito, G. L.; Pryor, W. A.; Czapski, G. Free
Radical Biol. Med. 1996, 21, 965.
38) Sch o¨ neich, Ch.; Yang, J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 2 1996,
15.
39) Buxton, G. V.; Greenstock, C. L.; Helman, W. P.; Ross, A. B. J.
Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 513.
(
9
(
(42) M o¨ nig, J.; Goslich, R.; Asmus, K.-D. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem.
1986, 90, 115.