ChemComm
Communication
Notes and references
C. P. Pradeep, N. Gadegaard and L. Cronin, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2009, 131, 1340; (c) J. Thiel, D. Yang, M. H. Rosnes, X. Liu,
5
À
‡
Caution: care should be taken when using IO
since there is a risk of explosion or combustion.
Synthesis of (TEAH) Na[H 59(IO
)]Á5H
10.0 g, 30.3 mmol) and triethanolamine hydrochloride (7.0 g,
7.7 mmol) were dissolved in water (20 mL) and H IO (0.5 g, 2.2 mmol)
6
based materials
C. Yvon, S. E. Kelly, Y.-F. Song, D.-L. Long and L. Cronin, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 8871.
4 B. Kandasamy, C. Wills, W. McFarlane, W. Clegg, R. W. Harrington,
A. Rodriguez-Fortea, J.-M. Poblet, P. G. Bruce and R. J. Errington,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 59.
C. Lydon, C. Busche, H. N. Miras, A. Delf, D.-L. Long, L. Yellowlees
and L. Cronin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 2115.
X. K. Fang and P. K o¨ gerler, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 8123;
X. K. Fang, P. K o¨ gerler, Y. Furukawa, M. Speldrich and M. Luban,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 5212.
(a) P. J. S. Richardt, R. W. Gable, A. M. Bond and A. G. Wedd, Inorg.
Chem., 2001, 40, 703; (b) D. M. Way, J. B. Cooper, M. Sadek, T. Vu,
P. J. Mahon, A. M. Bond, R. T. C. Brownlee and A. G. Wedd, Inorg.
Chem., 1997, 36, 4227.
§
5
5
W
18
O
3
2
O
1: Na
2
WO
4
Á2H
2
O
(
3
5
6
in water (5 mL) was added. The solution pH was adjusted to 1.3 by
dropping in 6 M HCl and the solution was heated to reflux and stirred
5
for about 1.0 h until the solution turned to light brown and purple I
vapour just started to appear in the flask. Light brown crystalline
product was then isolated in three days. Yield: 3.2 g. Elemental analysis,
2
6
calc. for C30
Na 0.44%. Found: C 7.80, H 1.81, I 2.46, N 1.46, Na 0.76%. Cation exchange
to produce (TBA) [H 59(IO )] 2: (C 16NO Na[H 59(IO O 1
)]Á5H
1.0 g) was dissolved in water (20 mL). Tetrabutylammonium bromide (1.0 g)
5
H85IN NaO77W18 (dried sample): C 6.91, H 1.65, I 2.44, N 1.34,
7
6
5 18
W O
3
6
H
3
)
5
5
W
18
O
3
2
(
dissolved in water (10 mL) was added with stirring. The precipitate was
centrifuged and washed with water, ethanol and ether, and dried in
vacuum. Yield: 0.7 g. Elemental analysis, calc. for C96
8
9
D.-L. Long, P. K ¨o gerler and L. Cronin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004,
43, 1817.
H
221IN
6
O
62
W18: C
(a) C. Fleming, D.-L. Long, N. McMillan, J. Johnson, N. Bovet,
V. Dhanak, N. Gadegaard, P. K ¨o gerler, L. Cronin and M. Kadodwala,
Nat. Nanotechnol., 2008, 120, 229–233; (b) R. Tsunashima, D.-L. Long,
T. Endo, S. Noro, T. Akutagawa, T. Nakamura, R. Q. Cabrera,
P. F. McMillan, P. K o¨ gerler and L. Cronin, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
2011, 181, 7295.
1
¶
9.58, H 3.78, I 2.16, N 1.43%. Found: C 19.80, H 3.73, I 2.21, N 1.50%.
Crystallographic data and structure refinements for (TEAH) Na
5
À1
[
H
5
W
18
O
59(IO
3
2 5 r
)]Á5H O 1: C30H95IN NaO82W18, M = 5297.29 g mol ;
3
block crystal: 0.19 Â 0.15 Â 0.05 mm ; T = 150(2) K; triclinic, space
group P1%, a = 14.1743 (3), b = 18.6898(4), c = 21.2836(5) Å, a = 89.751(2)1,
3
À3
b = 87.320(2)1, g = 70.905(2)1, V = 5321.9(2) Å , Z = 2, r = 3.306 g cm
,
À1
10 D.-L. Long, H. Abbas, P. K o¨ gerler and L. Cronin, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2005, 52, 3415.
11 D.-L. Long, Y. F. Song, E. F. Wilson, P. K o¨ gerler, S. X. Guo,
A. M. Bond, J. S. J. Hargreaves and L. Cronin, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2008, 47, 4384.
2 R. Contant and R. Thouvenot, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1993, 212, 41.
3 D.-L. Long, P. K o¨ gerler, A. D. C. Parenty, J. Fielden and L. Cronin,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 4798.
m(Mo-K
a
) = 19.76 mm , F(000) = 4724, 86 475 reflections collected,
1
9 759 unique, 1101 refined parameters, R = 0.0591, wR = 0.1782. The
1 2
+
cluster is well defined in the asymmetric unit. One Na site is identified
by the coordination environment around the site. Four TEAH sites are
roughly modelled in the structure. The fifth TEAH molecule (or a little
more according chemical analysis) is believed to be located in the
heavily disordered solvent area. Crystal data were measured on a Oxford
+
+
1
1
Gemini A Ultra Atlas CCD diffractometer using Mo-K
.71073 Å) at 150(2) K. Twin data process and structure refinement were
a
radiation (l =
1
4 Why was cation exchange needed, see for example: D.-L. Long,
C. Streb, Y. F. Song, S. Mitchell and L. Cronin, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
0
applied in this structure determination. CCDC 951761 (1) contains the
2008, 130, 1830.
crystallographic data.
1
5 W. Levason, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1997, 161, 33.
1
6 (a) J. Yan, D.-L. Long, E. F. Wilson and L. Cronin, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2009, 48, 4376; (b) D. Rodewald and Y. Jeannin, C. R. Acad. Sci.,
Paris Ser. IIc, 1999, 2, 63; (c) Y. Ozawa and Y. Sasaki, Chem. Lett.,
1987, 923; (d) Y. Jeannin and J. Martinfrere, Inorg. Chem., 1979,
18, 3010; (e) B. Krebs, E. Droste, M. Piepenbrink and G. Vollmer, C.
R. Acad. Sci., Paris Ser. IIc, 2000, 3, 205.
1
(a) M. T. Pope and A. M u¨ ller, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1991, 30, 34;
b) C. L. Hill, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 1; (c) D.-L. Long, E. Burkholder and
L. Cronin, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 105; (d) D.-L. Long,
R. Tsunashima and L. Cronin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 1736.
(a) H. N. Miras, J. Yan, D.-L. Long and L. Cronin, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012,
(
2
3
41, 7403; (b) D.-L. Long and L. Cronin, Chem.–Eur. J., 2006, 12, 3698.
(a) H. N. Miras, G. J. T. Cooper, D.-L. Long, H. B o¨ gge, A. M u¨ ller, 17 R. Bakri, A. Booth, G. Harle, P. S. Middleton, C. Wills, W. Clegg,
C. Streb and L. Cronin, Science, 2010, 327, 72; (b) Y. F. Song,
N. McMillan, D.-L. Long, S. Kane, J. Malm, M. O. Riehle,
R. W. Harrington and R. J. Errington, Chem. Commun., 2012,
48, 2779.
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 9731--9733 9733