938
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 52, No. 4, April, 2003
Budnikova et al.
in EtOH was in the cathodic area. The solution was heated
under argon to 50 °C. After passing 200 mA h electricity (<1/3 of
the amount obtained based on 5 F per P atom) at the anodic
potential from +1.0 to +1.26 V, the cell voltage increases draꢀ
matically (from 16 to 75 V), because the copper ions are sepaꢀ
rated from the solution within a brown precipitate and the soluꢀ
tion becomes nonconducting. The absence of the copper ions in
the solution is confirmed by the CV data. The addition of the
supporting electrolyte does not change the situation. Thus, it is
impossible to continue electrolysis under these conditions beꢀ
cause the solution contains no anodic depolarizer.
Divided electrolysis at the ratio Cu : P4 = 20. The anodic
area of the divided cell was loaded with EtOH (30 mL), CuCl2
(0.268 g, 2 mmol), and a saturated solution of white phosphorus
in benzene (4 mL, 0.1 mmol). A saturated solution of Et4NBF4
in EtOH was in the cathodic area. The solution was stirred
under argon at 50 °C for ∼1 h. The color of the solution changed
from saturated green to brown but the solution remained homoꢀ
geneous. The CV curves demonstrated a decrease in the height
of the CuII/CuI peak and an increase in the height of the more
cathodic peak (presumably, CuI). According to the 31Р NMR
spectroscopic data, (EtO)3PO is selectively formed under these
conditions. The anodic oxidation of CuI was carried out at a
current of 200 mA and a potential of +0.2 V (5 F per initial
phosphorus atom or 1 F per initial CuII salt). Then the proceꢀ
dure on loading and consumption of phosphorus was repeated
thus accumulating triethyl phosphate in the solution.
Reaction of copper(II) acetate with white phosphorus in an
ethanol medium at the ratios Cu : P4 = 20 and 10. A saturated
solution of white phosphorus (0.2 mL, 0.05 mmol) in benzene
was added to a solution of Cu(AcO)2•H2O (0.2 g, 1 mmol) in
EtOH (10 mL), so that the initial molar ratio CuII : P4 was 20. In
order to record the CV curves, Et4NBF4 (5•10–2 mol L–1) was
added. The solution was stirred for 1 h at ∼20 °C, due to which
its color changed from blue to brown. After the repeated addiꢀ
tion of a saturated solution of white phosphorus in benzene
(0.2 mL, 0.05 mmol), the Cu : P4 molar ratio in the solution
became equal to 10. The solution was stirred with the added
second portion of Р4 for 2 h, and a black precipitate was formed.
Heating of the solution to 50 °C accelerates the process, so that
the reaction ceases within 20 min. The precipitate was filtered
off and washed with diethyl ether. The elemental composition of
the precipitate corresponds to the formula C8H24Cu2NPO or
Et4N+Cu2P–•2H2O. Found (%): C, 33.3; H, 6.9; Cu, 44.1;
N, 4.9; P, 10.8. Calculated (%): C, 29.63; H, 7.40; Cu, 39.20;
N, 4.32; P, 9.57. The products of phosphorus transformation are
(EtO)3PO and (EtO)2PHO with the total yield to 30%.
References
1. V. Dambrin, M. Villieras, J. Lebreton, L. Toupet, H. Amri,
and J. Villieras, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 871.
2. Ya. A. Dorfman, M. M. Aleshkova, G. S. Polimbetova, L. V.
Levina, T. V. Petrova, R. R. Abdreimova, and D. M.
Doroshkevich, Usp. Khim., 1993, 62, 928 [Russ. Chem. Rev.,
1993, 62 (Engl. Transl.)].
3. Ya. A. Dorfman and R. R. Abdreimova, Zh. Obshch. Khim.,
1993, 63, 289 [Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 1993, 63 (Engl. Transl.)].
4. Ya. A. Dorfman, R. R. Abdreimova, and D. N. Akbaeva,
Kinet. Katal., 1995, 36, 103 [Kinet. Catal., 1995, 36 (Engl.
Transl.)].
5. Ya. A. Dorfman, R. R. Abdreimova, and D. M.
Doroshkevich, Teor. Eksp. Khim., 1991, 659 [Theor. Exp.
Chem., 1991 (Engl. Transl.)].
6. Ya. A. Dorfman and R. R. Abdreimova, Koord. Khim., 1996,
22, 764 [Russ. J. Coord. Chem., 1996, 22 (Engl. Transl.)].
7. R. A. Cherkasov, Metalloorg. Khim., 1989, 2, 13 [Organomet.
Chem. USSR, 1989, 2 (Engl. Transl.)].
8. P. M. Bersier, L. Carlsson, and J. Bersier, Top. Curr. Chem.,
1994, 170, 113.
9. E. Leonel, E. Dolem, M. Devaud, P. Paugam, and J.ꢀY.
Nedelec, Electrochim. Acta, 1997, 42, 2125.
10. M. Pilo, G. Manca, M. A. Zoroddu, and R. Sceber, Inorg.
Chim. Acta, 1991, 180, 225.
11. A. Cinquantini, R. Cini, R. Seeber, and P. Zanello,
J. Electroanalyt. Chem., 1981, 121, 301.
12. P. Zanello, P. A. Vigato, and G. A. Mazzocehin, Transition
Met. Chem., 1982, 7, 291.
13. R. Bhalla, M. Hellivell, R. L. Beddoes, D. Collison, and
C. D. Garner, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1998, 273, 225.
14. A. Domenech, E. GarciaꢀEspana, S. V. Luis, V. Marcellino,
and J. F. Miravet, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2000, 299, 238.
15. E. Franco, E. LopezꢀTorres, M. A. Mendiola, and T. Sevilla,
Polyhedron, 2000, 19, 441.
16. T. V. Magdesieva, K. P. Butin, and O. A. Reutov, Usp.
Khim., 1988, 57, 1510 [Russ. Chem. Rev., 1988, 57 (Engl.
Transl.)].
17. Yu. G. Budnikova, O. E. Petrukhina, and Yu. M. Kargin,
Zh. Obshch. Khim., 1996, 66, 610 [Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 1996,
66 (Engl. Transl.)].
18. K. P. Butin, V. V. Strelets, and O. A. Reutov, Metalloorg.
Khim., 1990, 3, 814 [Organomet. Chem. USSR, 1990, 3 (Engl.
Transl.)].
19. Y. Okamoto, T. Kusano, and S. Takamuku, Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn., 1988, 61, 3359.
This work was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (Project Nos. 01ꢀ03ꢀ33210
and 01ꢀ15ꢀ99353) and the INTAS (Grant 00ꢀ0018).
Received April 22, 2002;
in revised form January 5, 2003