J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 120, No. 4, 22 January 2004
Reaction dynamics of ClϩCH3SH
1793
II. EXPERIMENTS
According to chemical dynamics of the reaction type
XϩHY with a heavy–light–heavy mass relationship,9 the
fractions of available energy transforming into vibrational
The apparatus employed to obtain time-resolved IR
emission spectra has been described previously,6,14,15 only a
brief summary is given here. The photolysis beam from a
XeCl laser ͑308 nm, 41 Hz repetition rate͒ with a fluence
ϳ80 mJ cmϪ2 was employed to photodissociate S2Cl2 to pro-
duce Cl atoms to initiate the reaction. Emission of reaction
products were collected with a Welsh cell and detected with
a step-scan Fourier-transform IR spectrometer equipped with
a CaF2 beamsplitter and an InSb detector. The transient sig-
nal of the InSb detector ͑risetime 0.22 s͒ was amplified
͑bandwidth 1 MHz͒ before being digitized with either an
internal digitizer ͑16-bit digitizing resolution, 5 s temporal
resolution͒ or an external data-acquisition board ͑12-bit digi-
tizing resolution, 25 ns temporal resolution͒. To decrease the
duration of data acquisition, a filter passing 2010–3310 cmϪ1
for detection of HCl was used to facilitate undersampling of
interferograms. At each scan step data were typically aver-
aged over 60 laser pulses; 6450 scan steps were performed to
yield an interferogram resulting in a spectrum of resolution
and rotational energies of HX,
f
and f , respectively,
͘ ͗ ͘
r
͗
v
should be nearly independent of Y. On the other hand, if
available energy were statistically distributed, Y of a more
complex structure would compete successfully for energy,
leading to HX with less internal energy. In order to under-
stand the effect of the structure of Y on reaction dynamics,
we extend investigation of reaction ͑1͒ to the reaction
ClϩCH SH→HCl ,J͒ϩCH S ,J͒.
͑v ͑v
͑2a͒
3
3
Dill and Heydtmann employed the arrested relaxation
method to observe IR chemiluminescence of HCl from reac-
tions ͑1͒ and ͑2a͒ with a FTIR spectrometer; Cl atoms were
produced from microwave-discharged Cl2 .7 They observed
for reaction ͑1͒ emission from only HCl( ϭ1) with a rota-
tional distribution peaked near J ϭ4, but for reaction ͑2a͒
v
Ј
emission from HCl( ϭ1 and 2͒ with rotational distributions
v
peaked at J ϭ2 and 1, respectively. For reaction ͑2a͒, they
Ј
reported a rotational energy of 5.3 kJ molϪ1 and a ratio of
0.5 cmϪ1
.
vibrational distributions 0.10:0.90 for HCl( ϭ2):HCl(
v
v
Typical flow rates and partial pressures are 0.07–0.24
STP cm3 sϪ1 and 0.022–0.075 Torr for CH3SH, 0.22–0.45
STP cm3 sϪ1 and 0.070–0.142 Torr for S2Cl2 , and 0.32–4.14
STP cm3 sϪ1 and 0.10–1.30 Torr for Ar; STP implies a stan-
dard temperature of 273 K and pressure of 1 atm Ar ͑Scott
Specialty Gases, 99.9995%͒ and CH3SH ͑AGA Specialty
Gases, 99.5%͒ were used without purification. S2Cl2
ϭ1), corresponding to an average vibrational energy of 38.3
kJ molϪ1 if the population of HCl( ϭ0) is assumed to be
v
negligible. The internal energy of the CH3S product was un-
investigated.
Nesbitt and Leone10 detected IR chemiluminescence of
HCl to determine the rate coefficient k2aϭ(1.8Ϯ0.4)
ϫ10Ϫ10 cm3 moleculeϪ1 sϪ1 for reaction ͑2a͒; they used
S2Cl2 as a source of Cl and initiated the reaction with laser
irradiation at 300 nm. More recent measurements on the rate
¨
͑Riedel–de Haen, 99%͒ was degassed at 180 K before use.
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
coefficient of reaction ͑2a͒ range from 1.1ϫ10Ϫ10 to 2.0
11,12
ϫ10Ϫ10 cm3 moleculeϪ1 sϪ1
.
Nesbitt and Leone10 used
We employed S2Cl2 rather than Cl2 as a source of Cl
atoms because CH3S reacts with Cl2 to propagate chain
reactions.10,16 Photodissociation of S2Cl2 in a molecular
beam at 308 nm has been extensively investigated with frag-
mentation translational spectroscopy.17 As discussed previ-
ously, the average translational energy of Cl atoms immedi-
ately after photolysis at 308 nm is 64 kJ molϪ1, yielding
an average collisional energy of 38 kJ molϪ1 between Cl
and CH3SH.6 At a pressure of 0.32 Torr, there are more
than 12 collisions within 1 s; hence most Cl atoms are
thermalized within 1 s. At 0 K reactions ͑2a͒ and ͑2b͒ have
enthalpies of reaction ⌬Hؠ
ϭϪ68.2 kJ molϪ1 and ⌬Hؠ
ϭϪ42.0 kJ molϪ1, respectively, derived from enthalpies of
also Cl2 as a source of Cl and observed a chain reaction with
a length smaller than that expected for reaction ͑2a͒, fol-
lowed by
CH3SϩCl2→CH3SClϩCl.
͑3͒
They also proposed a possible involvement of the reaction
ClϩCH3SH→HClϩCH2SH,
͑2b͒
and later determined the rate coefficient to be k2bϭ(4.3
13
Ϯ1.0)ϫ10Ϫ12 cm3 moleculeϪ1 sϪ1
.
Nicovich et al. inves-
tigated reaction ͑2͒ using Cl2CO as a source of Cl; they
reported a small negative temperature dependence of k2 and
found no kinetic isotope effect when they replaced CH3SH
with CD3SD, indicating that formation of an energized ad-
duct is rate determining.11 Although both reactions ͑1͒ and
͑2a͒ have small negative activation energy, only the former
shows a substantial kinetic deuterium-isotope effect;11 hence
reaction mechanisms of these two reactions might be differ-
ent. Comparison of internal state distributions of reaction
products from these reactions might provide further informa-
tion on the details of their reaction mechanism.
formation ͑in kJ molϪ1
͒
of Cl ͑119.62͒,18 CH3SH
(Ϫ12.12),19 CH3S (131.42),20 CH2SH (157.59),21 and HCl
͑Ϫ92.13͒.18 Hence the available energies for reactions ͑2a͒
and ͑2b͒ at 298 K are ϳ79.4 and 53.2 kJ molϪ1, respectively,
after taking into account translational and rotational energies
of Cl and CH3SH; theoretical calculations predict no barrier
for reaction ͑2a͒.22 An available energy used for reaction ͑2a͒
in previous work was 75 kJ molϪ1 7
Park et al. used tunable infrared diode laser to probe the
.
transition Cl(2P1/2
)
Cl(2P3/2) and reported that the relative
Here we report measurements of internal-energy distri-
butions of HCl produced from reaction ͑2a͒ by means of
TR-FTS in emission mode and compare with those deter-
mined for HCl from reaction ͑1͒.6
yield of Cl(2P1/2) is 0.48Ϯ0.06 from photolysis of S2Cl2 at
308 nm.23 The rate coefficient of quenching of Cl(2P1/2) by
Ar is small,24 (3.0Ϯ1.0)ϫ10Ϫ16 cm3 moleculeϪ1 sϪ1, but
that by S2Cl2 is much larger. Based on the data of Park
85.159.90.66 On: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:31:18