Letters
J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 107, No. 51, 2003 11263
on the basis of the reported activation volumes, and a more
detailed mechanistic interpretation based on these values is, at
present, pure speculation. Careful ab initio studies may provide
predictions of volume changes associated with the two proposed
reaction mechanisms and allow more detailed interpretation of
the data.
Acknowledgment. We gratefully acknowledge financial
support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the
ETH Zu¨rich.
References and Notes
(1) Systematic names: O2•-, dioxide(•1-); NO•, oxidonitrogen(•);
NO2-, dioxonitrate(1-); NO3-, trioxonitrate(1-); ONOO-, oxoperoxoni-
trate(1-). The trivial names superoxide, nitrogen monoxide, nitrite, nitrate,
and peroxynitrite, respectively, are allowed. Leigh, G. J., Ed. Nomenclature
of Inorganic Chemistry; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, U.K.,
1990. Koppenol, W. H. Pure Appl. Chem. 2000, 72, 437-446.
(2) Nauser, T.; Koppenol, W. H. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 4084-
4086.
(3) Lymar, S. V.; Hurst, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8867-
Figure 2. Pressure dependence of the rate constant for the decay of
peroxynitrous acid at different temperatures. Squares: 25 °C, ionic
strength 0.1 M, peroxynitrite 150 µM, final pH ) 4.2, ∆V‡ ) +6.0 (
0.5 cm3 mol-1. Circles: 3 °C, ionic strength 0.1 M, peroxynitrite 135
µM, final pH ) 3.8, ∆V‡ ) +4.8 ( 0.2 cm3 mol-1. k0 ) 0.10 s-1 at
3 °C. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval for an additional
determination.
8868.
(4) Meli, R.; Nauser, T.; Latal, P.; Koppenol, W. H. J. Biol. Inorg.
Chem. 2002, 7, 31-36.
(5) Mere´nyi, G.; Lind, J.; Goldstein, S.; Czapski, G. J. Phys. Chem. A
1999, 103, 5685-5691.
(6) Coddington, J. W.; Hurst, J. K.; Lymar, S. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 2438-2443.
(7) Gerasimov, O. V.; Lymar, S. V. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 4317-
4321.
reported stopped-flow data giving rise to an average value of
(8) Richeson, C. E.; Mulder, P.; Bowry, V. W.; Ingold, K. U. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7211-7219.
9.7 ( 1.4 cm3 mol-1 19
.
There is one activation volume in Table 1 that requires
comment. At 3 °C a value of 4.8 ( 0.2 cm3 mol-1 is reported.
At low temperature, there is nearly quantitative conversion of
peroxynitrous acid to nitric acid without formation of nitrite
and dioxygen.10 In this case, homolysis does not seem to be
the likely reaction pathway.
(9) Koppenol, W. H.; Moreno, J. J.; Pryor, W. A.; Ischiropoulos, H.;
Beckman, J. S. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1992, 5, 834-842.
(10) Kissner, R.; Koppenol, W. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 234-
239.
(11) Maurer, P.; Thomas, C. F.; Kissner, R.; Ru¨egger, H.; Greter, O.;
Ro¨thlisberger, U.; Koppenol, W. H. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 1763-
1769.
(12) Bohle, D. S.; Hansert, B.; Paulson, S. C.; Smith, B. D. J. Am. Chem.
All in all, the average values quoted above are, indeed, not
very disparate when one considers that different laboratories,
using different experimental techniques, different peroxynitrite
preparations, and different reaction media were employed. Thus,
it is safe to conclude that the conversion of peroxynitrous to
nitric acid is characterized by a moderately positive activation
volume. What does this mean in terms of the mechanism of
the conversion reaction? It is reasonable to expect that the
mechanism involving rotation around the N-O bond followed
by intramolecular HO transfer requires a small but moderate
volume increase in the transition state, i.e., in line with the lower
numbers reported in Table 1.20 On the other hand, the suggested
homolysis mechanism is expected to require a substantial
volume increase in going to the transition state, i.e., in line with
the higher numbers reported in Table 1.17-20 This means that
the range of experimental values in Table 1 does not enable
definitive discrimination between the two possible mechanisms
Soc. 1994, 116, 7423-7424.
(13) van Eldik, R.; Gaede, W.; Wieland, S.; Kraft, J.; Spitzer, M.; Palmer,
D. A. ReV. Sci. Instrum. 1993, 64, 1355-1357.
(14) Bugnon, P.; Laurenczy, G.; Ducommun, Y.; Sauvageat, P. Y.;
Merbach, A. E.; Ith, R.; Tschanz, R.; Doludda, M.; Bergbauer, R.; Grell,
E. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 3045-3049.
(15) Goldstein, S.; Meyerstein, D.; van Eldik, R.; Czapski, G. J. Phys.
Chem. A 1997, 101, 7114-7118.
(16) Kissner, R.; Nauser, T.; Bugnon, P.; Lye, P. G.; Koppenol, W. H.
Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1997, 10, 1285-1292.
(17) Goldstein, S.; Meyerstein, D.; van Eldik, R.; Czapski, G. J. Phys.
Chem. A 1999, 103, 6587-6590.
(18) Coddington, J. W.; Wherland, S.; Hurst, J. K. Inorg. Chem. 2001,
40, 528-532.
(19) Lymar, S. V.; Khairutdinov, R. F.; Hurst, J. K. Inorg. Chem. 2003,
in press.
(20) (a) Drljaca, A.; Hubbard, C. D.; van Eldik, R.; Asano, T.;
Basilevsky, M. V.; le Noble, W. J. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 2167-2289. (b)
High-Pressure Chemistry: Synthetic, Mechanistic and Supercritical Ap-
plications; van Eldik, R., Kla¨rner, F.-G., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
Germany, 2002.