Page 5 of 6
Analytical Chemistry
After each experiment, the Nafion membrane was immersed
SUPPORTING INFORMATION AVAILABLE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
in 1 M HNO solution for 2 min, then washed thoroughly with
3
Additional information as noted in text. This information is availꢁ
able free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/.
deionized water before next use. The relative standard deviaꢁ
tion of measurements was 7.07%.
Method validation against GCꢁMS Determination of TATP
REFERENCES
ꢁ1
TATP working solutions in acetone at 1ꢁ10 mg L concenꢁ
(1) Wolffenstein, R. Berichte der deutschen chemischen
Gesellschaft 1895, 28, 2265ꢁ2269.
(2) Dubnikova, F.; Kosloff, R.; Almog, J.; Zeiri, Y.; Boese, R.;
Itzhaky, H.; Alt, A.; Keinan, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1146ꢁ
trations were analyzed with GCꢁMS, and the mean value of
three repetitive injections was used for each calculation. The
calibration equation between peak area (A) and concentration
was:
1
159.
3) Marshall, M.; Oxley, J. C. In Aspects of Explosives Detection,
Oxley, M. M. C., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2009, pp 11ꢁ26.
4) SchulteꢁLadbeck, R.; Karst, U. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 482,
(
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
4
4
A = 4.17x10 C
ꢁ1.10x10 (r = 0.9998)
TATP
(
The results of measurements carried out in solution and on
Nafion membrane were validated against the reference GCꢁ
1
83ꢁ188.
28
(5) Parajuli, S.; Miao, W. J. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 8008ꢁ8015.
(6) Burks, R. M.; Hage, D. S. Anal.&Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 395,
01ꢁ313.
MS procedure using TATPꢁcontaminated soil samples. For
ꢁ1
the recovery of TATP from 5 mg L solutions on N=5 repetiꢁ
3
tive determinations, the proposed and reference methods esꢁ
sentially showed no significant differences between the preciꢁ
sion and accuracy of results (see Supporting Information,
Table Sꢁ2). The tꢁ (Student) and Fꢁtests were used for comparꢁ
(
7) Kende, A.; Lebics, F.; Eke, Z.; Torkos, K. Microchimica Acta
2
008, 163, 335ꢁ338.
(8) Krawczyk, T.; Baj, S. Anal. Lett. 2014, 47, 2129ꢁ2147.
(9) SchulteꢁLadbeck, R.; Vogel, M.; Karst, U. Anal.&Bioanal.
30
Chem. 2006, 386, 559ꢁ565.
10) Peters, K. L.; Corbin, I.; Kaufman, L. M.; Zreibe, K.; Blanes,
L.; McCord, B. R. Anal. MethodsꢁUK 2015, 7, 63ꢁ70.
11) Lichtenstein, A.; Havivi, E.; Shacham, R.; Hahamy, E.;
ing the population means and variances, respectively . The
confidence level used in validation of solution phase findings
was 95% for both tꢁ and Fꢁ tests, whereas the corresponding
levels in Nafion membrane measurements were 95% and 99%,
respectively, for tꢁ and Fꢁtests (Table Sꢁ2).
(
(
Leibovich, R.; Pevzner, A.; Krivitsky, V.; Davivi, G.; Presman, I.;
Elnathan, R.; Engel, Y.; Flaxer, E.; Patolsky, F. Nat. Commun. 2014,
5.
Conclusions
(
12) Capua, E.; Kumar, T. A.; Tkachev, M.; Naaman, R. Isr. J.
Chem. 2014, 54, 586ꢁ594.
13) Lin, H. W.; Suslick, K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
There are a great many complex techniques for TATP analꢁ
ysis in the literature, but methods for field analysis are limited.
Some of these methods are patented and some require highꢁ
cost and easily inhibited peroxidase enzymes. Alternatively, a
novel colorimetric method using Fe O MNPs has been develꢁ
(
1
5519ꢁ15521.
(14) Mamo, S. K.; GonzalezꢁRodriguez, J. SensorsꢁBasel 2014, 14,
23269ꢁ23282.
(15) Girotti, S.; Ferri, E.; Maiolini, E.; Bolelli, L.; D'Elia, M.;
Coppe, D.; Romolo, F. S. Anal.&Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 400, 313ꢁ320.
3
4
oped and converted into a sensor on a Nafion membrane. The
method has high selectivity over possible interferents existing
in nitroꢁexplosive residues, household detergents, reducing
sugars, acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamolꢁcaffeine and soil
extracts. Both the Nafion membrane and Fe O MNPs are
(
(
16) Li, X. H.; Zhang, Z. J.; Tao, L. Analyst 2013, 138, 1596ꢁ1600.
17) Eren, S.; Uzer, A.; Can, Z.; Kapudan, T.; Ercag, E.; Apak, R.
Analyst 2010, 135, 2085ꢁ2091
(18) Salles, M. O.; Meloni, G. N.; de Araujo, W. R.; Paixao, T. R.
L. C. Anal MethodsꢁUk 2014, 6, 2047ꢁ2052.
3
4
reusable; additionally, unlike peroxidase, MNPs can be magꢁ
netically separated from the medium to stop the reaction at any
desired point. Because of these advantages, the developed
method has a low cost per analysis, enabling the screening of
large numbers of samples in the field. In addition, the achieved
LOD values for the proposed method are very suitable for
field use and results validated against GCꢁMS. The combined
use of magnetite NPs and DMPD membrane sensor enables
the development of a precise, sensitive and selective method
for TATP assay, which is suitable for both automated and onꢁ
site analysis. This membrane sensor increased sensitivity and
precision with respect to solutionꢁbased measurements, and is
believed to find potential use in antiꢁterror activities for public
security.
(
19) Wei, H.; Wang, E. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 2250ꢁ2254.
(20) Gao, L.; Zhuang, J.; Nie, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, N.;
Wang, T.; Feng, J.; Yang, D.; Perrett, S.; Yan, X. Nature
nanotechnology 2007, 2, 577ꢁ583.
(21) Chang, Q.; Deng, K. J.; Zhu, L. H.; Jiang, G. D.; Yu, C.;
Tang, H. Q. Microchim. Acta 2009, 165, 299ꢁ305.
(
22) Zhuang, J.; Zhang, J. B.; Gao, L. Z.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, N.; Feng,
J.; Yang, D. L.; Yan, X. Y. Materials Letters 2008, 62, 3972ꢁ3974.
23) Gao, Y.; Wang, G.; Huang, H.; Hu, J.; Shah, S. M.; Su, X.
(
Talanta 2011, 85, 1075ꢁ1080.
(24) Wang, N.; Zhu, L.; Wang, D.; Wang, M.; Lin, Z.; Tang, H.
Ultrasonics sonochemistry 2010, 17, 526ꢁ533.
(25) Zhang, S.; Zhao, X.; Niu, H.; Shi, Y.; Cai, Y.; Jiang, G.
Journal of hazardous materials 2009, 167, 560ꢁ566.
(
26) Çekiç, S. D.; Avan, A. N.; Uzunboy, S.; Apak, R. Anal Chim
Acta 2015, 865, 60ꢁ70.
(27) SchulteꢁLadbeck, R.; Kolla, P.; Karst, U. Anal. Chem. 2003,
75, 731ꢁ735.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
(
28) Rasanen, R. M.; Nousiainen, M.; Perakorpi, K.; Sillanpaa, M.;
Polari, L.; Anttalainen, O.; Utriainen, M. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 623,
9ꢁ65.
29) In Applications of Hydrogen Peroxide and Derivatives, Jones,
* Fax: +90 212 4737180. Eꢁmail: rapak@istanbul.edu.tr
5
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
(
The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Ministry of
National Defence, Office of Technical Services, and to the
Mechanical & Chemical Industry Corporation (MKEK) for the
donation of nitroꢁ and composite explosive samples. Additionally,
the authors thank TUBITAK (Turkish Scientific and Technical
Research Council) for the research project 114Z131.
C. W.; Clark, J. H., Eds.; The Royal Society of Chemistry, 1999, pp
37ꢁ78.
(30) Miller, J. C. J. C.; Miller, J. N. J. N. Statistics for analytical
chemistry, 3rd ed ed.; Ellis Horwood PTR Prentice Hall, 1993.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment