468
M. Li et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 686 (2016) 467e478
price, which limit the technology from becoming a ubiquitous form
of renewable energy. Therefore, commercial viability of electro-
chemical devices about metal-air batteries can only be achieved
through the use of low-cost and abundant catalysts for ORR/OER.
Developing efficient and cost-effective electro-catalysts using
earth-abundant elements for ORR/OER is still highly desirable.
Some efforts have been directed towards the incorporation of
excellent noble metal-free ORR and OER catalysts into a composite,
in which the constituent ORR and OER catalysts retain their indi-
vidual properties. This strategy has been used in the past with
platinum group metals for obtaining bi-functional materials for
acid media [9], and more recently by combining OER active low-
cost transition metal oxides with carbon supports that provide
ORR functionalities for alkaline media [15]. Fe based nanostructures
have been widely explored for various kinds of electro-catalysts. To
date, in most reports on iron-based catalysts they always deliver
considerable electro-catalytic activities being similar to Pt-based
catalytic active sites and contain enough transport channels for
electrons/reactants.
With these in mind, in this work, for the first time, we attempt
to prepare novel material of three-dimensional (3D) hierarchical
meso/macroporous Fe/Co-nitrogen-doped carbon encapsulated Fe/
Co nanoparticles (NPs) from low-cost common paper towels (as the
carbon precursors) without any template or surfactant. The con-
stant dosage of paper towels (2 g) were first impregnated with
30 mL of 66.7 mM M(AC)
then dried at room temperature. Finally, the catalysts were pre-
pared by temperature-programming in a tube furnace under NH at
2
aqueous solution (M ¼ Fe and/or Co), and
3
ꢁ
ꢀ1
ꢁ
a heating rate of 5 C min and kept at 800 C for 2 h. Those
resultant catalysts are denoted as FexCo(1ꢀx)-N/PC, where x values
2 2
represent the molar ratios of Fe(AC) used in the total M(AC) and
have been controlled as 1, 0.75, 0.5, 0.25 and 0 respectively. For
example, the Fe0.75Co0.25-N/PC represents the usages of
Fe(AC) $4H O and Co(AC) $4H O are 369 mg (50 mM) and
2 2 2 2
catalysts in ORR, such as: Fe/Fe
3
CeC based catalysts; FeN
x
C/C
124.5 mg (16.7 mM) in 30 mL impregnated solution. Those 3D hi-
erarchical meso/macropores of resultant samples will provide
plenty of low-resistance channels for both electron and mass
transfer. Especially, after optimizing the x values of FexCo(1ꢀx)-N/
PC in the impregnated solutions, compared with other samples, the
resultant Fe0.5Co0.5-N/PC catalyst could get a better balance in
both OER and ORR catalyses, accompanying the minimum over-
potential between ORR and OER.
based catalysts, FeeNeC composite, etc. [16e20] However, Fe
based catalysts cannot give consideration to the highly efficient
OER catalytic activity [21,22]. Cobalt, on the other hand, is abundant
and large amounts of Co based composites have been reported to
have good OER activities, which are considerable activities even
2 2
compared with RuO and IrO catalysts in alkaline media [23e27].
Summarizing those facts mentioned above, to design and synthe-
size bi-functional catalysts for both ORR and OER with merits of
high activity, low-cost, and excellent stability; the incorporation of
good ORR catalyst (based on Fe) and OER catalyst (based on Co) into
a composite is one of the effective ways, in which the constituent Fe
and Co based catalytic active sites retain their individual properties.
Up to now, a material of FeCoN/rGO has been tentatively prepared
as ORR/OER bi-functional catalyst. Even so, may be limited by the
lack of porous structures and nonuniformity of active site disper-
sion, its ORR/OER activities is not so excellent, in order to further
enhance the total catalytic efficiency, Ru elements have been
inevitably used [28].
From a rational design point of view, an ideal electro-catalyst
should have highly active catalytic centers to facilitate a complete
reversibility of the electrochemical process; meanwhile, those
active catalytic sites should also be easily accessible to the electrons
and reactants necessary to complete the electrochemical reactions
2. Experimental
2.1. Reagents and apparatus
The paper towels were afforded by ‘mind act upon mind’ and
obtained from the local supermarket in Changchun. Fe(AC)
2 2
$4H O,
Co(AC) $4H O, KOH, and Nafion solution (5 wt%) were purchased
2
2
from Sigma-Aldrich. The commercial 20 wt% Pt/C catalyst was ob-
tained from Johnson Matthey Company (Shanghai, China). All these
chemicals were used as delivered without further treatment. Cyclic
voltammetry (CV) and rotating disk electrode (RDE, d ¼ 5 mm)
voltammetry experiments were performed with a PARSTAT 2273.
Meanwhile, all electrochemical measurements were performed in a
standard three-compartment cell. The modified RDE, Pt wire, and
Ag/AgCl electrodes acted as working, counter, and reference elec-
trodes, respectively.
[29]. Generally, the exposed edges are affected by the morphologies
and structures of catalysts. Hence, designing ORR/OER electro-
catalysts with more Fe and Co based catalytic active edge sites
and better electron/proton transport efficiency is one effective
strategy to enhance their catalytic activity. Since they were syn-
thesized for the first time, porous carbonaceous materials (such as
ordered mesoporous carbon, onion-like mesoporous carbon vesi-
cles, macroporous carbon, hierarchical porous carbon foams, etc)
have been paid intensive attention on their electrochemical appli-
cations [30e37]. However, for large-scale development and
industrialization of these catalysts, their primary obstacles are the
complex preparation processes. In fact, in recent years, for pre-
paring porous carbonaceous catalysts, carbon materials derived
from renewable biomass resources have received considerable
attention because biomass is extensively available, accessible and
recyclable [38e41]. Porous carbon composite membranes have
been prepared using low-cost common filter papers as precursors
2.2. Synthesis of catalysts and modified electrodes
The intact preparation procedures of the FexCo(1ꢀx)-N/PC cat-
alysts have been displayed in Supplementary Scheme S1. The
detailed descriptions are placed in the supporting information
(Synthesis of catalysts in the supporting information). Prior to
modification, the RDE was polished carefully with alumina pow-
ders and then cleaned with HNO
water. The catalyst ink was prepared by mixing 3 mg catalyst
powders into 1 mL Nafion solution (0.5 wt%). Then 30 L of the
3
(1: 1), ethanol, and deionized
m
catalyst ink was dropped onto the cleanly washed RDE and dried
before electrochemical experiments.
2.3. Physical characterization and electrochemical measurements of
the resultant catalysts
[42]. At the same time, A4 printing papers have also been carbon-
ized into graphene-tethered carbon fiber composite papers [43]. As
shown in Fig. S1, as the different processing methods compared
with those for filter papers and ordinary papers, the light trans-
mission tests prove that paper towels show the best transmittancy,
displaying a higher porosity. We conjecture this structure is very
suitable for preparing porous carbons dispersed by abundant Fe/Co
The detailed descriptions for the physical characterizations and
ORR/OER electro-chemical measurements of those resultant cata-
lysts were also located in the supporting information. It’s important
to note that in the electrochemical testing processes for ORR and
OER, the polarization curves were plotted as potential (E vs. RHE)
ꢀ2
versus log |j(mA cm )| to get the Tafel plots for assessing the ORR