Ó 2003 The Chemical Society of Japan
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 76, 2111–2115 (2003) 2111
Crystal Structure of High Temperature Phase and Ionic Conductivity
Mechanism of CuHgSX (X = Cl, Br)
ꢀ
Masakazu Moro’oka, Hiroshi Ohki, Koji Yamada, and Tsutomu Okuda
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University,
1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526
Received April 14, 2003; E-mail: morooka@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
We found a new ionic conduction phase in CuHgSCl above 373 K and in CuHgSBr above 346 K. The crystal struc-
tures of these novel phases have been determined by Rietveld refinement of powder X-ray diffraction patterns. The elec-
tric conductivity at 500 K measured by AC impedance method was 1:4 ꢁ 10ꢂ5 S cmꢂ1 for CuHgSCl and 4:0 ꢁ 10ꢂ6
S cmꢂ1 for CuHgSBr. The activation enthalpy was determined to be 53 kJ molꢂ1 for CuHgSCl and 67 kJ molꢂ1 for
CuHgSBr. The ionic transport number measurements indicated that Cuþ ions constitute the majority charge carriers
in these samples. The electronic contribution to the conduction process is small in comparison with the Cuþ ionic
contribution. The charge density analysis by the maximum entropy method (MEM) combined with Rietveld analysis
clearly showed that the Cuþ ionic conduction path was along the crystallographic (100) direction.
It is well known that copper and silver halogenides are cat-
ionic conductors. Many double salts of these halogenides with
other compounds show higher conductivity at lower
temperature. For example, Cu2HgI4 and Ag2HgI4, which are
synthesized by the reaction of CuI or AgI with HgI2, undergo
phase transitions at 342 K and 323 K, respectively, and the elec-
tric conductivity ꢀ jumps one to two orders of magnitude.
In the family of MHgSX (M = Cu, Ag; X = Cl, Br, I), which
were prepared by combination of copper and silver halogenides
with HgS, only a few compounds have been characterized.
Gullio et al. determined the crystal structures of CuHgSCl
and CuHgSBr.1 They showed the electrical conductivity and
activation energy only at 298 K for CuHgSBr. Blachnik et
al. synthesized AgHgSBr and AgHgSI, and made a phase dia-
gram of the AgI–HgS system.2 They synthesized AgHgSCl and
examined the equilibrium diagrams of the CuCl–HgS and
AgCl–HgS systems as well.3 On the other hand, Beck et al.
reported the structures of CuHgSeBr, AgHgSBr and AgHgSI
synthesized by hydrothermal synthesis.4 Recently, they report-
ed new structures of CuHgSCl and CuHgSBr, which are differ-
ent from those given by Gullio et al.5
In this paper, we report the conductivity and the mechanism
for the high temperature phases of CuHgSCl and CuHgSBr.
These compounds were easily synthesized by solid-state
reaction. Although the structure of the high temperature phase
of CuHgSBr was determined by Beck et al., the structure and
the phase transition temperature for CuHgSCl are unknown.
Therefore, we have determined the structure of CuHgSCl by
Rietveld refinement of powder X-ray diffraction pattern. More-
over, the Cuþ ion behavior at high temperatures was studied by
maximum entropy method (MEM)/Rietveld method. We will
discuss the ion conduction mechanism for CuHgSX (X = Cl,
Br).
Experimental
CuHgSX (X = Cl, Br) were prepared by heating stoichiometric
mixtures of CuX (Kojundo Chemical Lab. Co.) and red-HgS
(Kojundo Chemical Lab. Co.) in an evacuated Pyrex tube at ca.
573 K for 2 weeks. CuX was synthesized by a solid-state reaction
between CuX2 (Kojundo Chemical Lab. Co.) and powdered Cu
metal (Soekawa Chemicals Co.).
Differential thermal analysis (DTA) measurements were carried
out by use of a homemade apparatus. The powder X-ray diffrac-
tion patterns were measured on a Rigaku Rint 2000 system using
Cu-Kꢁ radiation with scan rate = 0.5 degree/min and scan step
of 0.02 degree.
The crystal structure of the high temperature phase was initially
guessed by the Monte Carlo Method,6 and refined by Rietveld
method using the RIETAN2000 program.7
The electron densities of these crystals were analyzed by Max-
imum Entropy Method (MEM) combined with the Rietveld pattern
fitting.8 During the electron density analysis, the unit cell of the
ꢀ
sample was divided into edges of ca. 0.1 A each.
The electric conductivity was determined by AC impedance
method. The complex impedance measurements were performed
by the two-terminal method using a computer-interfaced HIOKI
3532 LCR meter (42 Hz–5 MHz). The pellet sizes were 13 mm
diameter and 1.5–1.8 mm thickness. Carbon paint was applied
on both sides of the pellet and electrodes to insure a good contact
with each other. The temperature of the sample was controlled
within ꢃ1 K using a Chino KP1000 temperature controller equip-
ped with Cu–Constantan thermocouples.
The ionic transport measurements were carried out using an ion-
blocking method and a non-blocking method. (i) In the non-block-
ing method, the two pellets of the sample were sandwiched be-
tween copper electrodes. A constant DC current of 0.01 mA
was applied across the sample for 5 days at 500 K using an AD-
VANTEST programmable DC voltage/current generator. (ii) In
the ion-blocking method, the two pellets of the sample were sand-
Published on the web November 15, 2003; DOI 10.1246/bcsj.76.2111