Communication
ChemComm
and Cr(III)–O–Ti bonds.29 Moreover, as the calcination tempera- (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning
ture increased, some Cr(VI) would convert to Cr(III), as shown in (TP2019041) for financial support.
Fig. 1. Combining the experimental results in Fig. 2, it is
speculated that some of the Cr(VI)–O–Ti bonds and Cr(III)–O–Ti
bonds might break, and then Cr2O3 crystals would form at an
Conflicts of interest
elevated calcination temperature. Additionally, the Cr(III) in the
form of Cr2O3 crystals on the surface of TiO2 cannot catalyse the
oxidation of HAIBN to AIBN with H2O2, but the synergy between
Cr(VI)–O–Ti and Cr(III)–O–Ti plays a real catalytic role. Therefore,
based on the experimental data and previous work,30 the possi-
ble catalytic mechanism of the CrOx/TiO2 catalyst for the oxida-
tion of HAIBN to AIBN is shown in Fig. 4. Cr(VI)–O–Ti can easily
oxidize HAIBN and it itself would transform into Cr(III)–O–Ti.
Generally, Cr(III) can be oxidized to Cr(VI) by H2O2 in alkaline
solution or in Fenton-like systems, but this process can also
happen over the CrOx/TiO2 catalyst in a neutral environment and
at 40 1C.31 The reasons might be that the electron cloud in the
Ti–O–Cr(III) structure is more biased towards O–Ti, and Cr(III)
preferably loses electrons and becomes Cr(VI), which make it
possible for H2O2 to oxidize Ti–O–Cr(III) in the mild reaction
environment. Hence, these two steps led to the smooth progress
of the cycle reaction because of the participation of the CrOx/TiO2
catalyst, as shown in Fig. 4. We note that more details about the
reaction mechanism (including density functional theory calcula-
tion) need further investigations, which are currently underway.
In summary, we have demonstrated that a novel TiO2-
supported CrOx catalyst can be prepared by a simple impreg-
nation method, and the synthesized CrOx/TiO2 catalyst exhibits
superior catalytic activity and a high yield for the oxidation of
HAIBN using 30 wt% H2O2 at 40 1C. Compared with the
traditional chlorine oxidation method, this safe, green, effi-
cient, and reusable CrOx/TiO2-400 catalyst shows comparable
catalytic performance with complete conversion of HAIBN and
an 89% yield of AIBN even in the fifth cyclic reaction. Moreover,
the possible catalytic reaction mechanism and the formation
pathways of the products over the CrOx/TiO2 catalyst have been
proposed. This catalytic system may also afford an environmen-
tally green and general route for the synthesis of other azo
compounds, and has significant industrial application prospects.
Data curation – Hu Zhang; investigation – Hu Zhang and
Shengnan Yue; supervision – Xiujing Zou and Xueguang Wang;
writing the original draft – Hu Zhang; writing, review & editing –
Xueguang Wang; Xingli Zou and Xionggang Lu.
There are no conflicts to declare.
Notes and references
1 B. V. K. J. Schmidt, Polym., 2019, 12, 39.
2 J. Kreutzer and Y. Yagci, Polym., 2018, 10, 35.
3 X. Wang, S. Lascelles, R. Jackson and S. Armes, Chem. Commun.,
1999, 1817–1818.
4 L. Androvic, J. Bartacek and M. Sedlak, Res. Chem. Intermed., 2016,
42, 5133–5145.
5 C. J. Hawker, G. G. Barclay, A. Orellana, J. Dao and W. Devonport.,
Macromolecules, 1996, 29, 5245–5254.
6 M. Sedlak and K. Tauer, Mol., 2000, 5, 730.
7 H. Mutlu, C. M. Geiselhart and C. Barner-Kowollik, Mater. Horiz.,
2018, 5, 162–183.
8 J. Lalevee and J. P. Fouassier, Overview of Radical Initiation, Encyclo-
pedia of Radicals in Chemistry, Biology and Materials, John Wiley &
Sons, Ltd, 2012.
9 K. Taued and S. Kosmella, Polym. Int., 2010, 30, 253–258.
10 C. G. Overberger, P. Huang and M. B. Berenbaum, Org. Synth., 1963,
4, 274.
11 J. Schirmann and P. Bourdauducq. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Indus-
trial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002.
12 C. G. Overberger, M. T. O’shaughnessy and H. Shalit, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1949, 71, 2661–2666.
13 J. Thiele and K. Heuser, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1896, 290, 1.
14 C. Winder, Environ. Res., 2001, 85, 105–114.
15 G. L. Squadrito, E. M. Postlethwait and S. Matalon, Am. J. Physiol.:
Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol., 2010, 299, 289–300.
16 R. Ciriminna, L. Albanese and F. Meneguzzo, ChemSusChem, 2016,
9, 3374–3381.
17 B. Roduit, M. Hartmann, P. Folly, A. Sarbach, P. Brodard and
R. R. Baltensperger, Thermochim. Acta, 2015, 621, 6–24.
18 S. Guo, W. Wan, C. Chen and W. Chen, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.,
2013, 113, 1169–1176.
19 S. Liu, C. Cao, W. Lin and C. Shu, J. Hazard. Mater., 2019, 365, 164–177.
20 X. L. Bao, L. F. Cui and B. Chen, Chinese Pat., CN108484444B, 2019.
21 Q. Wang, X. Fang, P. Hao, H. Ren, Y. Zhao, F. Huang, J. Xie, G. Cui
and B. Tang, Chem. Commun., 2020, 56, 11827–11830.
22 S. Wu, X. Tan, J. Lei, H. Chen, L. Wang and J. Zhang, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2019, 141, 6592–6600.
23 H. Du, X. Guo, R. Kong and F. Qu, Chem. Commun., 2018, 54,
12848–12851.
24 F. Chen, K. Shen, Y. Yang, H. Huang and Y. Li, ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces, 2020, 12, 48691–48699.
25 M. Tian, Y. Jian, M. Ma, C. He, C. Chen and C. Liu, Appl. Catal.,
2019, 570, 62–72.
26 Y. Huang, H. Konnerth, J. Yeh, M. H. G. Prechtl, C. Wen and
K. C. Wu, Green Chem., 2019, 21, 1889–1894.
27 S. Liu, K. You, J. Song, R. Deng, F. Zhao, P. Liu, Q. Ai and H. Luo,
Appl. Catal., A, 2018, 568, 76–85.
28 P. Du, A. Bueno-Lopez, M. Verbaas, A. R. Almeida, J. A. Moulijin and
G. Mul, J. Catal., 2008, 260, 75–80.
29 F. Meng, M. Zhang, F. Zhou, B. Zhu, Y. Zeng, S. Zhang and Q. Zhong,
Catal. Lett., 2020, 150, 1–11.
30 S. Yu, S. Xu, B. Sun, Y. Lu, L. Li, W. Zou, P. Wang, F. Gao, C. Tang
and L. Dong, RSC Adv., 2018, 8, 3858–3868.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (No. 52022054; 51974181), the Shanghai
Rising-Star Program (19QA1403600), the Iron and Steel
Joint Research Fund of National Natural Science Foundation
and China Baowu Steel Group Corporation Limited (U1860203),
and the Program for Professor of Special Appointment
31 A. D. Bokare and W. Choi, J. Hazard. Mater., 2014, 275, 121–135.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
Chem. Commun., 2021, 57, 4576–4579 | 4579