Mendeleev Commun., 2006, 16(5), 264–266
Table 1 Yields and characteristics of compounds 2a–d from ionic liquid esterifications.
1H NMR (CDCl3)
Yield Mp/°C
13C NMR (CDCl3)
Product
R
14N NMR
–34.6
(%) (Lit.)
CH2
R
C(NO2)3 CH2 CO2
R
7
(
6–76.5
2a
2b
2c
Ph
93
95
92
5.63 7.49, 7.64, 7.97
5.61 7.46, 7.90
123.3
125.4
122.6
61.1 163.7 126.9, 128.6, 130.2, 134.5
61.1 163.1 125.4, 129.2, 131.3, 141.3
61.3 167.3 28.0, 29.3, 128.1
76–77)17
84–85
p-ClC H
–34.8
–35.5
–31.2 (from R)
6
4
9
2–93
(O N) CCH CH
5.47 2.91, 3.45
18
2
3
2
2
(92–93)
2
d
e
85
79
3–5
5.29 0.94, 1.59
123.3
123.2
60.5 172.2 9.7, 12.3
–34.5
–34.8
2
48–49
5.58 6.58, 7.26, 7.67
60.6 155.3 112.5, 121.1, 141.7, 148.4
O
–
35.9
2
f
92
95
123–124 5.64 7.37
122.6
122.4
61.3 153.9 111.1, 121.3, 141.6, 153.4
61.4 152.0 8.6, 145.3, 155.9
NO2
–33.5 (from R)
O
Me
2g
59–60
70–72
5.73 2.54
–35.7
N
N
O
N
2h
74
5.72 8.72, 8.83, 9.19
5.46 3.63
19
122.8
122.2
61.5 161.3 141.0, 145.0, 146.3, 148.7
61.2 162.5 39.5
–35.3
–35.4
N
5
6–57
4
CH [CO CH C(NO ) ] 95
2
2
2
2 3 2
(56–57)
the synthesis of 2,2,2-trinitroethanol derivatives in RTILs, and
we describe here the result of the application of the media to the
esterification of the unusual alcohol.
O
O
O
O
Cl
Cl
OCH2C(NO2)3
OCH C(NO )
2 3
i
The addition of 2,2,2-trinitroethanol to a solution of benzoyl
chloride 1a in [emim][AlCl ] at room temperature leads to rapid
4
2
gas evolution with concurrent formation of a light yellow colour.
1
13
As found by H and C NMR spectroscopy and TLC, the major
aromatic product was 2,2,2-trinitroethyl benzoate 2a (Scheme 1)
even after 0.5 h. With [emim][PF ] or [emim][BF ], the reaction
3
4
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: i, [emim][PF ], ambient temperature.
6
6
4
was slower but led to a vary similar result. Ester 2a was generally
formed in a nearly quantitative yield. The recycling/reuse of the
solvent in several syntheses of compound 2a were performed
without regeneration of the ionic liquid with no drop in yields.
Other aromatic acid chlorides reacted similarly. Moreover, alkanoyl,
of the structures are shown in Figure 1. In all the compounds,
the Ar–C(O)OC fragment is slightly nonplanar. The nonplanarity
is more pronounced for 2g with the exocyclic torsion angle
C(5)–C(4)–C(3)–O(2) being 19.3(2)°. For the comparison of
the orientations of C–C(NO ) groups, we choose the torsion
2
3
cycloalkanoyl and hetaroyl chlorides reacted immediately with
angles listed in Table 2. It can be seen that the orientation of the
C(NO ) group relative to the C(2)–O(2) bond is nearly the same
†
2
,2,2-trinitroethanol under the same conditions to give corre-
2
3
sponding products in good yields (Table 1). In all of the reactions,
the solvent and reactants were thoroughly dried before use.
We found that it is possible to effect a similar esterification
of a diacid dichloride to a diester. Thus, when a solution of
for all the compounds, which is in an agreement with NMR data.
‡
Reflections for compounds 2a, 2b and 2g were collected on a SMART
1
000 CCD diffractometer [l(MoKα) = 0.71073 Å, graphite monochromator,
w-scans] at 120 K. The structures were solved by the direct methods and
refined by the full-matrix least-squares procedure against F in an
malonyl dichloride 3 in [emim][PF ] was treated with 2,2,2-tri-
6
2
nitroethanol (Scheme 2), desired ester 4 was obtained in 95% yield.
anisotropic approximation. All the hydrogen atoms were placed in
geometrically calculated positions and refined within a riding model.
1
13
14
The ester structures were established by H, C and N NMR
spectroscopy (Table 1). The location region of chemical shifts
For 2a (C H N O ): triclinic, space group P1, a = 7.703(3), b =
1
13
14
9
7
3
8
in the H, C and N NMR spectra, corresponding to the trinitro-
ethyl moiety, are consistent between products. By this expedient
these chemical shift values can be used as the diagnostics of
=
7.972(4), c = 9.910(3) Å, a = 85.08(3)°, b = 84.90(4)°, g = 72.88(4)°,
3
–3
–1
V = 578.2(4) Å , Z = 2, M = 285.18, d = 1.638 g cm , m = 0.148 mm ,
calc
F(000) = 292, wR = 0.1163, GOF = 0.995 for 2691 independent reflec-
2
2
,2,2-trinitroethanol esters.
tions with 2q < 56°, R = 0.0504 for 2116 reflections with I > 2s(I).
1
Compounds 2a, 2b and 2g were also characterised by single
For 2b (C H ClN O ): triclinic, space group P1, a = 7.3983(11),
9
6
3
8
‡
crystal X-ray crystallography for the first time. ORTEP views
b = 9.3861(13), c = 10.2912(15) Å, a = 109.731(3)°, b = 105.536(3)°,
3
–3
g = 102.726(3)°, V = 608.87(15) Å , Z = 2, M = 319.62, d = 1.743 g cm ,
calc
Cl
OCH C(NO )
m = 0.363 mm–1, F(000) = 324, wR = 0.1113, GOF = 1.047 for 2891
2
2 3
2
i
R
+
HOCH2C(NO2)3
R
independent reflections with 2q < 56°, R = 0.0472 for 2248 reflections
1
O
O
with I > 2s(I).
For 2g (C H N O ): orthorhombic, space group Pbca, a = 8.2018(13),
6
5
5
9
1
a–d
2a–d
3
b = 11.506(2), c = 23.245(4) Å, V = 2193.6(6) Å , Z = 8, M = 291.15,
–
3
–1
Scheme 1 Reagents and conditions: i, [emim][X], ambient temperature.
dcalc = 1.763 g cm , m = 0.169 mm , F(000) = 1184, wR2 = 0.0748,
GOF = 1.047 for 2376 independent reflections with 2q < 54°, R =
1
†
General procedure for the preparation of 2,2,2-trinitroethyl benzoate
= 0.0361 for 1658 reflections with I > 2s(I).
2
a. To a mixture of [emim][PF ] (20 ml) and benzoyl chloride 1a (1.4 g,
0 mmol), trinitroethanol (1.81 g, 10 mmol) was added under argon and
Atomic coordinates, bond lengths, bond angles and thermal param-
eters have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre
(CCDC). These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.uk/
conts/retrieving.html (or from the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge
CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336 033; or deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
Any request to the CCDC for data should quote the full literature citation
and CCDC reference numbers 613201, 613202 and 613203 for 2a, 2b and
2g, respectively. For details, see ‘Notice to Authors’, Mendeleev Commun.,
Issue 1, 2006.
6
1
anhydrous conditions. The reaction mixture was stirred at room tempe-
rature until the complete consumption of the starting reactants (0.5–3 h,
according to TLC and NMR). The product was separated from the residue
by extraction with a mixture of CH Cl and diethyl ether (1:1). The
2
2
combined extracts were washed with cold water and dried with MgSO4.
The solution was passed through a short SiO pad and evaporated to give
product 2a (see Table 1).
2
Mendeleev Commun. 2006 265