124
J. Fu et al. / Catalysis Today 263 (2016) 123–127
Table 1
O
O
O
Effect of catalysts on the yield of PHT.a
Cat. CuO
OMe
OMe
Entry
Reductant
Catalyst
Yield of PHT (%)
O
1
2
3
–
Zn
–
–
–
Cu
0
24
0
Zn, H2O
1
2
4
–
CuO
Fe
Cu
0
5
6
7
8
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
47
61
43
85
55
0
26
57
58
42
12
24
15
Co
CuO
Cu2O
Fe2O3
Fe3O4
TiO2
MnO2
ZrO2
CuFe2O4
Pd/C
Ni
may be produced in a similar manner. Herein, we present a highly
efficient conversion of DMP to PHT in the presence of CuO in aque-
ous media (Scheme 1).
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
2. Experimental
2.1. Experimental materials
a
Reaction conditions: DMP 0.5 mmol, reductant 25 mmol, catalyst 5 mmol,
250 ◦C, 2 h, water filling 25%.
DMP (>99%) as the initial reactant was purchased from J&K.
PHT (≥99%, chromatographic grade, J&K Scientific Ltd.) was used
for quantitative analysis. Zn (200 mesh, Aladdin) was used as the
reductant. Ni, Fe, Al, Mn, Mg, CuO, Al2O3, CuO, Cu2O, Fe2O3 and
Fe3O4 (200 mesh, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd) were also
used in the experiment.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Catalyst screening
2.2. Experimental procedure
in the presence of 5 mmol Cu and 25 mmol Zn at 250 ◦C for 120 min.
The result showed that the reaction proceeded efficiently and pro-
duced the desired PHT at a 61% yield, as determined by GC–FID
NMR and GC–MS (Figs. SI-2 and SI-3). Next, we screened a series
of metal or metal oxides to determine the most suitable one. The
results are summarized in Table 1. The reaction did not proceed at
all in the absence of both reductant and catalyst or in the presence
of the catalysts only (entries 1, 3–4). The reaction with 25 mmol Zn
but without the addition of any catalyst, gave the desired PHT at a
24% yield (entry 2), this result could be reckoned as an evidence of
the importance of the combined use of the reductant and catalyst.
Among the various catalysts we investigated (entries 5–17), the use
ineffective (entry 11). CuFe2O4 and Ni gave lower yield (entries 15,
17).
All experiments were carried out in a Tefion-lined stainless steel
batch reactor with an internal volume of 30 mL. 0.5 mmol DMP was
used in all experiments. The typical procedure for the synthesis
of PHT was as follows. First, desired DMP, reductant, catalyst and
ultrapure water were loaded into the reactor. Then, the nitrogen
was charged into the reactor in order to exclude the effect of air and
then the sealed reactor was put into a drying oven, it will take about
20 min to be preheated to the desired temperature. After a desired
reaction time, the reactor was quickly moved out from the dry-
ing oven to cool down. Liquid sample was collected and extracted
Solid sample was collected and washed with deionized water and
ethanol several times to remove impurities and dried in the oven
at 50 ◦C for 24 h. The schematic of the reactor system was shown in
Fig. SI-1.
in Fig. SI-4(a), the Cu still existes while Zn has been oxidized
into ZnO, it is obviously that the Cu acted as a catalyst and
Zn acted as a reductant in the reaction process. According to
the result of Fig. SI-4(b), unexpectedly, the Cu instead of CuO
is observed in the solid sample. Our previous work [28] had
confirmed that CuO could be reduced completely into Cu by in situ-
formed hydrogen by the oxidation of Zn in water. We measured
the Cu ion concentration in the solution by ICP and only a small
amount of Cu ions (<1 ppm) in the liquid sample was found. This
result suggested that Cu was most likely present in the solid
residual.
Next, we investigated the effect of the amount of CuO on
the yield of PHT. The reaction was conducted in the presence of
25 mmol Zn with 25% water filling at 250 ◦C for 120 min. The results
are shown in Fig. 2(a). The yield of PHT increased significantly at
first as the amount of CuO increased from 0 to 5 mmol, and the
maximum value of 85% PHT was achieved at 5 mmol CuO. The yield
decreased when the amount of CuO was further increased. These
results may be led from that more CuO would lead to the decompo-
sition of PHT to more by-products, which might result in a decrease
in PHT selectivity.
2.3. Product analysis
After the reaction, the solution samples were collected and fil-
tered for GC–MS analysis (Aglient GC7890A-MS5975C) equipped
with an HP-5 polyethylene glycol capillary column with dimen-
sions of 30 m × 250 m × 0.25 m, and GC–FID. Details on the
conditions of GC–MS/FID analyses are available elsewhere [15].
The total residual organic carbon concentration in liquid sam-
ples was also measured with a TOC analyzer (Shimadzu TOC-V).
The gas product was detected by thermal conductivity detector
(TCD, Agilent Technologies). Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was
performed on aluminum-precoated plates of silica gel 60 with
an HSGF254 indicator and visualized under UV light or devel-
oped by immersion in the solution of 0.6% KMnO4 and 6% K2CO3
in water. Solid samples were collected and analyzed by X-ray
diffractometer (Shimadzu XRD-6100) to determine the composi-
tion and phase purity. The yield of PHT is calculated as the following
equation:
the amount of PHT obtained
the amount of PHT in theory
The yield (%) =
× 100%