STRUCTURE AND EXTRACTIVE ABILITY OF 1-ALKYL- AND 3-METHYL-...
299
electron density on the coordination center, which
should render the resulting complexes less stable. In
view of the close electronic structures of reagents with
80
various-length alkyl substituents, one can suggest that
they would behave similarly with respect to metals,
and differences in the extraction behavior would be
associated with the intrinsic hydrophobilicity of the
1
2
60
reagents and resulting complexes. The hydrophobicity
can be measured by organic water distribution con-
40
20
0
stants (logD) [3]. Increasing alkyl chain length in-
creases the hydrophobicity of the molecule (Table 1),
which should improve extractive ability. Compound
V is close in hydrophobility to compound II. Thus,
from the data in Table 1 we can suggest that com-
pounds III and IV should be better extractants than
compound V.
3
4
0.05
0.10
0.15 0.20 0.25
Extraction by the coordination mechanism was
considered using the example of the extraction of
scandium ions from trichloroacetate solutions.
c(H2SO4), M
Fig. 1. Effect of acidity on the extraction of scan-
The effect of the aliphatic chain length on the ex-
tractive ability of the reagents is shown in Fig. 1. The
most effective is compound IV.
dium(III) (0.01 M) by 0.1 M solutions of compounds
I IV in CHCl from a 0.5 M solution of CCl COONa.
3
3
Compound: (1) IV, (2) III, (3) II, and (4) I.
The process can be described by a two-equation
system [4].
The distribution of the reagents between hydro-
chloric acid and chloroform and their protonation in
the organic phase were studied. Increasing concentra-
tion of the acid in the extraction system gives rise to
a sharp decrease in D (Fig. 2). The highest D values
are observed with compound IV. The reagent is
mostly present in the extract is salt (the protonation
degree for 2 M HCl in the aqueous phase is 85%).
Compound V scarcely extracts the acid.
Sc3+ + 3CCl3COO + 4LH(o)
H+ + CCl3COO + LH(o)
Sc(LH)4(CCl COO) (o)
,
3
3
LH2
.
CCl3COO(o)
Here LH(o) is the extraction reagent in the organic
phase.
Studying the extraction of trichloroacetic acid
showed that, starting from the acid concentration of
0.5 M, the reagents are almost completely protonated
in the organic phase. At higher acid concentrations,
overstoichiometric extraction takes place.
The protonation position is unknown: It can occur
both by heteroring nitrogen and by carbonyl oxygen.
Moreover, the process is complicated with the pre-
sence of various tautomers. Organic molecules are
most frequently protonated by an atom bearing the
largest negative charge. This is the carbonyl oxygen
atom in tautomers A and B and the pyrazole C4 and
N2 atoms in tautomer C. The protonation by C4
provides a structure that is identical to that formed by
the protonation of tautomer B by the carbonyl oxygen
atom. Since the charges on N2 and N4 in tautomer C
of compound V are close to each other ( 0.233 and
0.236, respectively), it is expedient to consider the
structure of the cation resulting from the protonation
by N2. In this case, a structure indentical to that
formed by the protonation of tautomer A by the
oxygen atom is formed. In view of the aforesaid, we
calculated structures D F.
The water chloroform distribution constants of
reagents I IV increase with increasing acidity. The
highest D values are characteristic of compound IV:
144 [c(CCl3COOH) 0.1 M] and 14 [c(CCl3COOH)
3 M].
The extraction of scandium(III) from trichloro-
acetate solutions with a 0.1 M solution of compound
V in a 10:1 chloroform 1-butanol mixture has been
studied in [5]. In view of the fact that scandium(III)
ions are partially extracted from trichloroacetate solu-
tions with aliphatic alcohols, it is safe to state that
here we deal with a synergistic effect.
The anion-exchange mechanism of metal extraction
with pyrazolones was studied using the example of
the extraction of tallium(III) from acidic chloride
solutions.
It follows from the data in Table 2 that the most
energetically favorable structure is cation E irrespec-
tive of the nature of the 1-substituent in the pyrazoline
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 75 No. 2 2005