prolonged storage under benchtop conditions (ambient
temperature and air). Thus, the results above also provide
another illustration as to the advantages of MIDA boronate
chemistry, when compared to experiences with alterna-
tive boronic esters or the parent boronic acid. Importantly,
the synthesis of compound 5 adds another valuable building
block to the MIDA family of reagents, which are rapidly
emerging as a versatile toolbox of stable boronic acid surro-
gates, for drug discovery and natural product synthesis.20,21
Of special note were Suzuki reactions with a wide variety of
heteroaromatic coupling partners (entries 9ꢀ15). These were
particularly significant since a large percentage of marketed
drugs contain a heterocyclic core.24 Thus, Suzuki reactions
with MIDA boronate 5 may present a particularly useful
method for introducing a trans-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl
group into a heterocyclic substrate. This is noteworthy since
previous studies to prepare (trifluoromethyl)cycloropyl pro-
ducts, using a 2 þ 1 cycloaddition between an alkene and
(trifluoromethyl)diazomethane, have detailed few examples
employing a heterocyclic starting material.11ꢀ13
Scheme 1. Synthesis and X-ray Structure of 5a
Table 1. Coupling with Halides or Pseudohalides
entry
X
yield of 7 (%)
1
2
3
4
I (6a)
78
78
65
54
OTf (6b)
Br (6c)
Cl (6d)
a Crystalimage simplified for clarity(see theSupportingInformation).
Next, we examined the use of (trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl
MIDA boronate 5 in palladium(0)-catalyzed Suzuki reac-
tions (Tables 1 and 2).22 It was found that 5 could readily
participate in such cross-couplings.23 For example, Suzuki
reactions could be undertaken with aryl iodide, triflate,
bromide, or chloride starting materials, using a model
naphthyl example (Table 1). As expected, the yield of the
trans-2-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl coupled product 7 was
greatest when starting from an aryl iodide or aryl triflate
(both giving a 78% yield; entries 1 and 2), as opposed to
starting from an aryl bromide or aryl chloride (65% and 54%
yield respectively; entries 3 and 4). Further reactions, pre-
dominately using bromo-containing starting materials due to
their commercial availability, demonstrate that a multitude
of functional groups commonly encountered in medicinal or
synthetic organic chemistry were tolerated in the coupling
partners (Table 2). For instance, compounds containing
fluoro, nitro, anilino, tetrazolone, alkyl, ketone, pentafluor-
osulfur, ether, ester, acetal, and lactam groups were not
affected under the reaction conditions, giving rise to the
expected trans-2-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl coupled pro-
ducts in moderate to excellent yields (entries 1ꢀ15).
Taken together, the results presented above provide
a broad illustration of the utility of MIDA boronate 5
in Suzuki cross-couplings. Presumably, these reactions
occur in a similar fashion to couplings with other MIDA
boronates, via in situ release of the corresponding boronic
acid from the MIDA ester starting material under the
basic conditions encountered in the reaction media.25
Significantly, many of the 2-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl
products described above are relatively low in mole-
cular weight and are compliant with “rule-of-three”
criteria26 describing attractive fragments for medicinal
chemists.27
In summary, this paper describes the synthesis of trans-
2-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropylboronic acid MIDA ester 5
and its use in Suzuki cross-coupling reactions with aryl or
heteroaryl substrates. By virtue of its unique structure and
three-dimensional chiral framework, the introduction of a
trans-2-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropyl group may present
a particularly useful fragment for chemists engaged in drug
discovery or materials science. Furthermore, our studies
provide another illustration as to the benefits of MIDA
boronate chemistry for solving a challenging synthetic
(20) For select examples of MIDA boronates in natural products
synthesis, see: (a) Lee, S. J.; Gray, K. C.; Paek, J. S.; Burke, M. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 466. (b) Woerly, E. M.; Cherney, A. H.; Davis,
E. K.; Burke, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 6941. (c) Lee, S. J.;
Anderson, T. M.; Burke, M. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8860.
(d) Brak, K.; Ellman, J. A. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2004. (e) Fujii, S.; Chang,
S. Y.; Burke, M. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7862. (f) Gray,
K. C.; Palacios, D. S.; Dailey, I.; Endo, M. M.; Uno, B. E.; Wilcock,
B. C.; Burke, M. D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109, 2234.
(21) Grob, J. E.; Nunez, J.; Dechantsreiter, M. A.; Hamann, L. G.
J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 10241.
(24) Bemis, G. W.; Murcko, M. A. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 2887.
(25) (a) Knapp, D. M.; Gillis, E. P.; Burke, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 6961. (b) Lennox, A. J. J.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C. Israel J. Chem.
2010, 50, 664.
(26) Congreve, M.; Carr, R.; Murray, C.; Jhoti, H. Drug Discovery
Today 2003, 8, 876.
(27) See the Supporting Information for full details.
(28) For asymmetric syntheses of 2-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropanes,
see ref 12a and Morandi, B.; Mariampillai, B.; Carreira, E. M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1101.
(22) (a) Wallace, D. J.; Chen, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6987.
(b) Milne, J. E.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13028.
(23) For a review, see: Gagnon, A.; Duplessis, M.; Fader, L. Org.
Prep. Proced. Int. 2010, 42, 1 and references cited therein.
(29) We have undertaken
a
chiral synthesis of
a trans-
2-(trifluoromethyl)cyclopropylboronic acid equivalent. Results will be
reported in due course.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C