360
M. C. Jahnke et al. · Molecular Structures and Catalytic Activity of Palladium Complexes
and leading to a dinuclear palladium complex with finement [12] were achieved with standard Patterson and
Fourier techniques. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined
with anisotropic displacement parameters. Hydrogen atoms
were added to the structure models in calculated positions.
Selected crystallographic details for [7]Br·2MeOH: For-
mula C29H37N5Br2O2Pd, M = 753.86, colourless crystal,
0.21 × 0.18 × 0.11 mm3, monoclinic, space group P21/c,
two bridging ligands. Both metal centers in this com-
plex are coordinated by two benzimidazolin-2-ylidene
donors, but with a different arrangement (cis or trans)
of the carbene donors. Attempts to use the palladium
complexes [5]Br–[8]Br as precatalysts in Suzuki-type
reactions showed in most cases an acceptable catalytic
activity in a range typically observed for neutral dicar-
bene pincer complexes.
˚
a = 17.3◦15(3), b = 9.2733(15), c = 19.470(3) A, β =
3
99.202(3) , V = 3086.0(8) A , ρcalcd = 1.62 g cm−3, µ =
˚
3.2 mm−1, empirical absorption correction (0.5508 ≤ T ≤
0.7180), Z = 4, 34191 intensities collected ( h, k, l),
8950 independent (Rint = 0.0458) and 6878 observed inten-
sities [I ≥ 2σ(I)], 358 refined parameters, residuals for all
data R = 0.0574, wR2 = 0.0880, max. residual electron den-
Experimental Section
The dibenzimidazolium dibromides 1 – 4 and the dicar-
bene palladium complexes [5]Br – [8]Br were prepared as
previously described [8a].
−3
˚
sity 0.91/−0.47 e A
.
Selected crystallographic details for [9]Br·H2O·MeOH:
Formula C59H72N10Br4O2Pd2, M = 1485.71, colourless
crystal, 0.24 × 0.11 × 0.07 mm3, triclinic, space group
General method for the Suzuki coupling: A two-necked
100 mL flask was fitted with a reflux condenser and
charged with an aryl bromide (1.0 mmol), phenylboronic
acid (0.144 g, 1.2 mmol) and potassium carbonate (0.276 g,
2.0 mmol). Toluene (50 mL) was added and the suspen-
sion was brought to reflux. The desired amount of the pal-
ladium complexes [5]Br–[8]Br was dissolved in 1 mL of
dichloromethane. This solution was injected into the boiling
toluene solution, and the mixture was refluxed for the de-
sired time. The mixture was allowed to cool to r. t. and the
organic phase was passed over a short silica gel column. The
resulting solution was then analyzed by quantitative GC anal-
ysis with a Shimadzu GC-2100 with an Aglient Technologies
HP 5 capillary column (30 m).
¯
˚
P1, a = 13.775(2), b = 14.842(2), c = 17.275(2) A,
α = 106.779(3), β = 93.275(3), γ = 104.697(3)◦, V =
3238.2(8) A , ρcalcd = 1.52 g cm−3, µ = 3.0 mm−1, em-
3
˚
pirical absorption correction (0.5262 ≤ T ≤ 0.8138), Z =
2, 31689 intensities collected ( h, k, l), 14861 in-
dependent (Rint = 0.0432) and 9373 observed intensities
[I ≥ 2σ(I)], 723 refined parameters, residuals for all data
R = 0.1037, wR2 = 0.1819, max. residual electron den-
−3
˚
sity 1.33/−0.79 e A
.
Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) have
been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data
Centre as supplementary publication CCDC 629034 for
[7]Br·2MeOH and CCDC 629035 for [9]Br·H2O·MeOH.
Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge via www.
ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data request/cif.
X-Ray structure determination of compounds [7]Br ·
2MeOH and [9]Br · H2O · MeOH: Suitable crystals of
[7]Br·2MeOH and [9]Br·H2O·MeOH were mounted on a
Bruker AXS 2000 CCD diffractometer equipped with a ro-
˚
tating molybdenum anode (λ = 0.71073 A) and a CCD area
Acknowledgement
detector. Diffraction data were measured at 153(2) K in the
range 2.4 ≤ 2θ ≤ 60.1◦ for [7]Br·2MeOH and 3.1 ≤ 2θ ≤
55.2◦ for [9]Br·H2O·MeOH. Structure solution [11] and re-
Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemein-
schaft (SFB 424 and IRTG 673) is gratefully acknowledged.
[1] a) F. E. Hahn, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45,
1348; b) D. Bourissou, O. Guerret, F. P. Gabba¨ı,
G. Bertrand, Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 39; c) W. A. Herr-
mann, C. Ko¨cher, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997,
36, 2162; d) W. A. Herrmann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 1290.
[2] a) F. E. Hahn, L. Wittenbecher, R. Boese, D. Bla¨ser,
Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 1931; b) F. E. Hahn, T. von
Fehren, R. Fro¨hlich, Z. Naturforsch. 2004, 59b, 348.
[3] a) F. E. Hahn, L. Wittenbecher, D. Le Van, R. Fro¨hlich,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 541; b) F. E. Hahn,
T. von Fehren, L. Wittenbecher, R. Fro¨hlich, Z. Natur-
forsch. 2004, 59b, 541; c) F. E. Hahn, T. von Fehren,
L. Wittenbecher, R. Fro¨hlich, Z. Naturforsch. 2004,
59b, 544; d) F. E. Hahn, T. von Fehren, T. Lu¨gger, In-
org. Chim. Acta. 2005, 358, 4137.
[4] a) F. E. Hahn, M. Foth, J. Organomet. Chem. 1999,
585, 241; b) F. E. Hahn, C. Holtgrewe, T. Pape, Z.
Naturforsch. 2004, 59b, 1051.
[5] F. E. Hahn, C. Holtgrewe, T. Pape, M. Martin, E. Sola,
L. A. Oro, Organometallics 2005, 24, 2203.
[6] a) H. M. J. Wang, I. J. B. Lin, Organometallics 1998,
17, 972; b) F. E. Hahn, M. C. Jahnke, T. Pape,
Organometallics 2006, 25, 5927.
[7] a) M. Tamm, F. E. Hahn, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1999,
182, 175; b) F. E. Hahn, V. Langenhahn, N. Meier,
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/16/17 10:40 AM