Computational Modeling of a StereoselectiVe Epoxidation
are possible, but for which the direction and degree of preference
are not known in advance. Furthermore, calculation of the proton
magnetic shieldings for the isomeric epoxides, followed by
comparison to the experimental proton NMR spectra of the
major (and perhaps minor) products, can be used to verify the
experimental outcome.
Computational Methods
24
The Gaussian 03 package was used to carry out all calculations.
2
5
Standard Pople-type basis sets were employed. All geometries
were optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G* level. It has previously been
shown that, for alkene epoxidations, B3LYP optimizations are the
best of the more affordable methods; MP2 optimizations, for
5,12,13
example, yield incorrect structures.
Carene epoxidation transi-
tion state structures were determined through a multistep process.
First, the two carbon-oxygen distances were fixed at the values
for the 2-methyl-2-butene transition state, and all other parameters
were allowed to optimize. Second, starting from these partially
optimized geometries, unconstrained optimizations (opt ) calcfc,ts)
were carried out, leading to the fully optimized transition state
structures. All transition structures were verified as transition states
by the calculation of vibrational frequencies at the B3LYP/6-31G*
level of theory; that is, one imaginary frequency was found.
Single point energies were calculated at B3LYP/6-311+G** and
MP2/6-311+G** using the B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometries.
Zero point energies calculated at B3LYP/6-31G* and corrected by
1
FIGURE 7. Calculated H NMR chemical shifts for trans- and cis-
carene epoxides compared to the experimental values obtained from
the carene epoxidation major product. Isotropic shielding constants were
calculated at B3LYP/6-311++G**//B3LYP/6-31G*. For the trans-
carene epoxide best fit line: slope ) 0.961, intercept ) –0.03, correlation
coefficient (R ) ) 0.990. For the cis-carene epoxide best fit line: slope
0.923, intercept ) 0.19, correlation coefficient (R ) ) 0.885.
26
a scale factor of 0.9804 were included, as well.
Isotropic shielding values were computed using the GIAO
2
27
method in conjunction with the B3LYP/6-311++G**//B3LYP/
2
)
6
-31G* level of theory. Calculated isotropic shielding values for
each of the three hydrogen atoms in a methyl group were averaged
to produce a single observable value for the methyl group as a
whole. The calculated isotropic shielding values were subtracted
from the corresponding value for TMS to yield calculated chemical
shift values, relative to TMS.
correspondence provides strong additional evidence that the
major product of carene epoxidation is indeed the trans-epoxide.
13
In addition, the observation that calculated C NMR shifts were
1
not useful for structure assignment in this case, but that the H
NMR shifts were, provides a perhaps interesting counter-
example to some of the successes recently reported with regard
Experimental Section
1
3
to the use of calculated C NMR shifts for structure determi-
To obtain experimental 13C and 1H NMR spectra, 117 µL of
2
3
nation.
(+)-3-carene was reacted with 437 mg of magnesium bis(monop-
eroxyphthalate) in 1 mL of methanol. The product was isolated by
diluting the mixture with 10 mL of ether and 2 mL of water. The
aqueous layer was removed and the organic layer washed three
Conclusions
The two reaction pathways for the epoxidation of 3-carene
by peroxyformic acid, leading to isomeric cis- and trans-epoxide
products, were explored via electronic structure calculations.
In agreement with expectations, the transition state leading to
the trans-epoxide was substantially lower in energy than that
leading to the cis-epoxide. Furthermore, although calculated
carbon NMR spectra did not prove useful, proton magnetic
shieldings computed for the trans-epoxide correlated much more
closely with the experimentally derived spectrum of the major
isomer than did the proton shieldings calculated for the cis
isomer. The present findings further illustrate the potential
usefulness of computational study of epoxidation reactions of
structurally and stereochemically complex alkenes using the
times and dried over MgSO
through a MgSO filter to remove the drying agent. The drying
agent was washed with 5 mL of ether, which was added to the
4
. The organic solution was then run
4
(24) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.;
Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci,
B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada,
M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.;
Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian,
H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.;
Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski,
J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg,
J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.;
Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.;
Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.;
Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.;
Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill,
P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A.
Gaussian 03, revision C.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.
4–8,13,14
methodology pioneered by Bach and co-workers
and by
7
,10,11
4,9
the groups of Freccero and Sarzi-Amadè
and of Houk.
Perhaps most usefully, this methodology can likely be used to
predict with a fair degree of confidence the outcomes of
epoxidations in which different stereoisomeric epoxide products
(
25) Hehre, W. J.; Radam, L.; Schleyer, P. v. R. ; Pople, J. A. Ab Initio
Molecular Orbital Theory; Wiley: New York, 1986.
26) Foresman, J. B.; Frisch Æ. Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure
Methods; Gaussian: Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.
27) (a) London, F. J. Phys. Radium 1937, 8, 397. (b) McWeeny, R. Phys.
(
(
(
23) Two recent examples: (a) Rychnovksy, S. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2895–
898. (b) Porco, J. A., Jr.; Su, S.; Lei, X.; Bardhan, S.; Rychnovsky, S. D. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5790–5792.
ReV. 1962, 126, 1028. (c) Ditchfield, R. Mol. Phys. 1974, 27, 789. (d) Dodds,
J. L.; McWeeny, R.; Sadlej, A. J. Mol. Phys. 1980, 41, 1419. (e) Wolinski, K.;
Hilton, J. F.; Pula, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8251.
2
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 9, 2008 3495