5
8
N. Tiwari et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 101 (2013) 54–58
Table 5
Application of the method for determination of methyl parathion in real samples.
Sample
Methyl parathion found (
Proposed method
l
g)a
Reported method [17]
GC–MS method [25]
Agricultural waste waterb
A
B
4.14 (0.029)
3.58 (0.064)
3.95 (0.039)
3.19 (0.041)
4.57 (0.011)
3.81 (0.009)
Vegetable samplesc
Cauliflower
Tomato
3.09 (0.019)
4.21 (0.039)
3.98 (0.026)
2.96 (0.032)
3.99 (0.061)
3.88 (0.061)
3.33 (0.016)
4.71 (0.018)
4.06 (0.021)
Spinach
a
b
c
Mean ± standard deviation (n = 5).
Volume of sample, 5 mL (from field where methyl parathion has been sprayed).
Amount of sample, 10 g (from field where methyl parathion has been sprayed).
–
–
–
D
G
¼
D
H ꢀ T
DS
compared with reported spectrophotometric methods. The easy
availability of the reagent and freedom from a large group of inter-
fering species are some advantages of the method. As the method
is based on the kinetic study it can be further applied for simulta-
neous determination of different organophosphorus pesticides by
partial least square method.
The results are given in Table 4.
Applications
Determination of methyl parathion in waste water samples
Acknowledgment
Water samples were collected from nearby runoff agricultural
field where methyl parathion was sprayed as a pesticide. Water
was filtered through a Whatman no. 40 filter paper and the aliquot
of the filtrate was analyzed as described above. Results were com-
pared with reported spectrophotometric [17] and GC–MS method
The authors are thankful to Government V.Y.T. PG Autonomous
College, Drug for laboratory facilities.
[
25] (Table 5).
References
Determination of methyl parathion in vegetable samples
[
1] G.M. Castanho, C.M.P. Vaz, S.A.S. Machado, J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 14 (2003) 594–
00.
6
[
[
2] D. De Souza, S.A.S. Machado, Electroanalysis 18 (2006) 862–872.
3] Compendio de Defensivos Agricolas, fifth ed., Organizacao Andrei Editora Ltda,
Sao Paulo, 1996.
Various samples of foliages and fruits were collected from agri-
cultural field where methyl parathion was sprayed. The samples
were weighed, macerated with ethanol and deionised water (1:1)
and then filtered through a thin cotton cloth. The filtrate was cen-
trifuged at 1850g for 10 min. The filtrate which was greenish yel-
low due to the presence of organic matter from plant was passed
through a silica gel column (10 ꢁ 1 cm) to remove chlorophyll
and other interfering materials. The column was washed with
[4] A. Mulchandani, W. Chen, P. Mulchandani, J. Wang, K.R. Rogers, Biosens.
Bioelectron. 16 (2001) 225–230.
[
5] P.F. McInnes, D.E. Anderson, D.J. Hoff, M.J. Hooper, L.L. Kinkel, Environ. Toxicol.
Chem. 15 (1996) 544–552.
[6] P. Mulchandani, C.M. Hangarter, Y. Lei, W. Chen, A. Mulchandani, Biosens.
Bioelectron. 21 (2003) 523–527.
[
[
[9] F.M. Rodrigues, P.R.R. Mesquita, L.S. Oliveira, F.S. Oliveira, A.M. Filho, P.A.
Pereira, J.B. Andrade, Microchem. J. 98 (2011) 56–61.
10] L.J. Qu, H. Zhang, J.H. Zhu, G.S. Yang, H.Y. Aboul-Enein, Food Chem. 122 (2010)
7] M. Filho, F.N. Santos, P.A.P. Pereira, Talanta 81 (2010) 346–354.
8] M. Filho, F.N. Santos, P.A.P. Pereira, Microchem. J. 96 (2010) 139–145.
1
0 mL ethanol. Washings were collected and analyzed as recom-
mended above by the proposed method. Results were compared
with reported spectrophotometric [17] and GC–MS method [25]
[
327–332.
(
Table 5).
Conclusion
Although many sophisticated techniques; GC, HPLC, voltametry,
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
11] G. Wu, X. Bao, S. Zhao, J. Wu, A. Han, Q. Ye, Food Chem. 126 (2011) 646–654.
12] Y. Wang, R. Du, Forensic Sci. Int. 198 (2010) 70–73.
13] C. Wu, N. Liu, Q. Wu, C. Wang, Z. Wang, Anal. Chim. Acta 679 (2010) 56–62.
14] C. Li, Z. Wang, G. Zhana, Colloids Surf. B 82 (2011) 40–45.
15] H. Parham, N. Rahbar, J. Hazard. Mater. 177 (2010) 1077–1084.
16] X. Tan, B. Li, K.Y. Liew, C. Li, Biosens. Bioelectron. 26 (2010) 868–871.
17] S. Sunita, V.K. Gupta, J. Ind. Chem. Soc. 65 (1987) 114–117.
18] Z.M. Getenga, J.I.O. Jandiiko, S.O. Wandigo, E. Beck, Bull. Environ. Contam.
Toxicol. 64 (2000) 359–369.
etc. are available but the factors such as the low cost of the instru-
ment, ease of handling, and almost no maintenance have caused
spectrophotometry to remain a popular and inevitable technique,
particularly in the laboratories of developing countries. Most of
the spectrophotometric methods reported for the determination
of methyl parathion suffer from drawbacks including reagent cost,
instability of color, interference, low sensitivity and selectivity. The
proposed spectrophotometric method is based on a new kinetic
approach which is more sensitive, simple and selective as
[19] J. Raju, V.K. Gupta, Microchem. J. 39 (1989) 166–171.
[
[
[
20] P. Shivhare, J. Raju, V.K. Gupta, Microchem. J. 42 (1990) 283–287.
21] Q. Zhang, S.O. Pehkonen, J. Agric. Food Chem. 47 (1999) 1760–1766.
22] Y. Magara, T. Aizawa, N. Matumoto, F. Souna, Water Sci. Technol. 30 (1994)
119–128.
23] J.G. Wu, D.A. Laird, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22 (2003) 261–264.
24] H.S. Lee, Y.A. Kim, Y.A. Cho, Y.T. Lee, Chemosphere 46 (2002) 571–576.
25] A. Aguera, L. Piedra, M.D. Hernando, A.R. Fernandez-Alba, M. Contreras,
Analyst 125 (2000) 1397–1402.
[
[
[