10.1002/chem.201803137
Chemistry - A European Journal
COMMUNICATION
It is well known that the formation constant of EDA
complexes is highly dependent on the free energy of the electron
transfer (i.e., ΔGET = Eox[donor] – Ered[acceptor]);[25] and the
oxidation potentials of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons generally
decrease with an increasing number of aromatic rings.[26] Indeed,
a plot of K against ΔGET shows a strong dependence that is well
described by the linear plot in the range of ΔGET = 1.2 to 0.7 V
(Figure S7 in the Supporting Information).[25]
moiety (Figure 3). A smaller contact area of the Dur- and Nap-
based pincers may prevent efficient stacking with DDQ leading to
diminished values of the binding constant.
In conclusion, we have successfully developed an efficient
method to synthesize a doubly-annulated m-terphenyl tweezer
platform, containing trifluoromethane-sulfonate groups at the 2-
and 12-positions for ready installation of various pincers. In
comparison with the Zimmerman tweezers, this new platform has
a higher oxidation potential and more structural flexibility to bind
with guest molecules, and the synthetic strategy affords
incorporation of pincers late in the synthesis. Thus, the
successful preparation of a number of tweezers based on a TP-
platform with different pincers varying from monobenzenoid to
polybenzenoid electron donors as pincers has been described,
and their binding affinity has been examined with DDQ as the
guest molecule. Among investigated tweezers, the pyrene-based
tweezer (T-Py) shows the strongest association with DDQ, with a
binding constant of 415 M-1 in a dichloromethane solution, and the
crystal structure reveals the sandwich-type complexation in the
solid state. Thus, the binding constants are of the same order of
magnitude as original Zimmerman tweezers,[6] and therefore this
novel framework holds potential in recognition/sensing of a variety
of guests. Future studies may involve introduction of the pincers
with large graphitic cores such as HBC. More applications of
molecular tweezers exploiting the reported novel framework are
under investigation.
Figure 3. Showing the side and top views (A/B) and
a space-filling
representation (C) of the X-ray structures of 1:1 EDA complex of T-Py∩DDQ
together with a solvent molecule (i.e. CH2Cl2). (Thermal ellipsoids drawn at 50%
probability).
Acknowledgements
We thank the NSF (CHE-1508677) for financial support,
Professor Scott A. Reid (Marquette University) for helpful
discussions and Dr. Maxim V. Ivanov (Marquette University) for
calculations and helpful discussions. The calculations were
performed on the high-performance computing cluster Père at
Marquette University and XSEDE.
Fortunately, we have obtained crystals of the charge-transfer
complex of T-Py and DDQ (i.e., T-Py∩DDQ) suitable for X-ray
crystallography. Dark-colored crystals of the 1:1 complex were
isolated from an equimolar solution of T-Py and DDQ in a mixture
of dichloromethane and acetonitrile, by a very slow evaporation of
the solution at ambient temperatures. X-ray crystallographic
analysis of the T-Py∩DDQ charge-transfer complex revealed that
DDQ is bound in a sandwich configuration between a pair of
pyrenyl donors, Figure 3. In addition, the entire complex contains
a local symmetry plane, and the m-terphenyl platform of the T-Py
tweezer adopts an achiral syn conformation (Figure 3). The
pyrene pincers are oriented almost parallel to each other with a
dihedral angle of 13.2°, and DDQ is located between the two
pyrenyl with equivalent interplanar distances of 3.2 Å. The
remaining empty space near the central benzene ring of the m-
terphenyl platform in the T-Py∩DDQ complex is filled by a solvent
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords: molecular tweezers • self-assembly •
supramolecular chemistry • charge transfer • DDQ
[1] A. Petitjean, R. G. Khoury, N. Kyritsakas, J.-M. Lehn, J Am
Chem Soc 2004, 126, 6637-6647.
[2] M. Harmata, Accounts Chem Res 2004, 37, 862-873.
[3] F.-G. Klärner, B. Kahlert, Accounts Chem Res 2003, 36,
919-932.
(i.e. CH2Cl2) molecule, which makes C-H…π
contacts, providing the weak intermolecular forces for the solid
state assembly (see Figure 3).
-H…O
Comparing the geometry of T-Py in the crystal structure of T-
Py∩DDQ EDA complex with that of the calculated syn T-Py, we
note that weak CH-π interactions between tilted Py moieties in
isolated T-Py are diminished in favor of the formation of sandwich-
like arrangement stabilized by the charge-transfer interactions in
the EDA complex (Figure 3). Besides pure electronic effects
discussed above, entropic effects may also contribute to the
observed difference in the binding between T-Dur, T-Nap and T-
Py. For example, the crystal structure of T-Py∩DDQ reveals that
the DDQ binds near the end rather than at the center of the Py
[4] C. W. Chen, H. W. Whitlock, J Am Chem Soc 1978, 100,
4921-4922.
[5] S. C. Zimmerman, in Supramolecular Chemistry I —
Directed Synthesis and Molecular Recognition (Eds.: J.
Canceill, J. C. Chambron, A. Collet, C. Dietrich-Buchecker,
H. D. Durst, J. P. Dutasta, F. H. Kohnke, B. Lozach, J. P.
Mathias, S. Misumi, J. P. Sauvage, J. F. Stoddart, D. A.
Tomalia, S. C. Zimmerman), Springer Berlin Heidelberg,
Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993, pp. 71-102.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.