Menschutkin Reaction and Halide LeaVing-Group Order
Summary
While the literature contains many examples of bifunctional
metal coordination complexes that can activate and attack
phosphate and carboxylate esters,27 there are very few uncharged
organic molecules that exhibit such dramatic reaction enhance-
ments (>105) as macrocyclic amine 1.28 Although stoichiomet-
ric, the Menschutkin reaction with 1 exhibits several kinetic
features that are reminiscent of enzymes, namely, formation of
a prereaction complex and substrate selectivity. There is a major
distortion of the halide leaving-group order because of selective
improvement of leaving-group ability in the order Cl > Br >
I, and the EM for reaction with 4-t-BuBn halides is 4-t-BuBnCl
(62 000 M) > 4-t-BuBnBr (2200 M) > 4-t-BuBnI (35 M).
Likely reasons for the selective enhancement are: (a) increased
transition-state stabilization due to hydrogen bonding in the
macrocyclic pocket and (b) reduced entropic penalty in the
transition state due to an increased fraction of prereaction
complexes that are oriented in a near attack conformation. The
small molecular size and structural simplicity of this bimolecular
reaction system means that it should be possible to devise
experimental and theoretical studies that determine the relative
contribution of these fundamentally important reaction accelera-
tion factors. A more practical goal is to develop highly reactive
macrocyclic amines that selectively sense and scavenge carci-
nogenic haloalkanes from the atmosphere.
FIGURE 4. Structures of NAC and TS.
hydrogen bonds increases in the order Cl- > Br- > I-.24 There
also may be differences in the entropy of activation. For
example, the near attack conformation (NAC) hypothesis states
that all enzyme-catalyzed reactions must proceed through a
ground state NAC that approximates the structure of the
transition state, but has not yet started bond forming and
shortening.25 Although formation of a prereaction complex (1‚
organohalide) is favored in the halide order of I > Br > Cl
(see values for Ka in Table 3), it is possible that the fraction of
prereaction complexes that adopt an NAC is higher when the
organohalide has a smaller and more polar C-X bond (i.e., Cl
> Br > I). Evidence for this statement are the results of high-
level molecular modeling, which indicate that upon binding to
macrocycle 1, the organohalide is oriented by weak intermo-
lecular interactions between its halogen atom and the macro-
cycle’s NH residues, and also its CH2 residues and the
macrocycle’s ether oxygens (Figure 4).10,26 This would favor
an NAC where the macrocycle’s tertiary nitrogen is poised to
attack the electrophilic CH2 with a classic SN2 trajectory. The
relative contributions of these energy components to the overall
value of ∆Guq cannot be determined from the experimental data,
but they can be accessed with modern molecular dynamics
simulations,25 an exercise that is beyond the scope of this current
experimental study.
Experimental Section
Materials. The synthesis and characterization of compounds 1,
3, and 4 is described in the Supporting Information. Compound 2
was purchased from a commercial supplier and used as supplied.
Kinetic Measurements. A 5-mm NMR tube, containing a
solution of macrocycle 1 in CDCl3 (5 mM, 750 µL), was placed in
an NMR spectrometer (500 MHz) and allowed to reach thermal
equilibrium (298.0 ( 0.1 K). In certain cases, the solution also
contained a specific concentration of DMSO inhibitor. After being
shimmed, a starting spectrum was acquired, a very small aliquot
of organohalide electrophile was added, and the reaction was
monitored by periodic acquisition of a spectrum. The changes in
peak intensity were monitored over time. Usually, the NH and
N-methyl peaks of starting material (1) and product were well
resolved, but changes in other peaks were also measured if possible.
The concentrations of starting material and product at any time
were calculated from the ratio of peak integrations. For relatively
fast reactions (>95% complete within 4 h), the NMR tube remained
in the NMR spectrometer throughout the run. For slower reactions,
the NMR tube was stored at 298 K in an incubator oven and
removed for periodic NMR acquisition. The curve fitting and
extraction of kinetic data are described in the Supporting Informa-
tion.
(23) Activation of a halide leaving group by hydrogen bonding is a
strategy that is employed by the family of enzymes known as haloalkane
dehydrogenases. The first catalytic step in the enzymatic process involves
attack of an organohalide by an active-site carboxylate nucleophile, and a
significant fraction of the rate enhancement is attributed to two NH residues
in the enzyme active site that form stabilizing hydrogen bonds with the
halide leaving group. Dev-Kesavan, L.; Gao, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 1532-1540.
(24) The halide association constants for macrocycle 1 in CDCl3
at 298 K are F- (1900 ( 400 M-1) > Cl- (620 ( 50 M-1) > Br-
(140 ( 30 M-1) > I- (90 ( 15 M-1), as determined by standard
NMR titration experiments using tetrabutylammonium halides. The
interaction is even stronger after the ion-pair product, 5, is formed.
Anion Association with Macrocycle 1. A 10 mM solution of
macrocycle 1 in CDCl3 was prepared in a 5-mm NMR tube (solution
volume 750 µL). Small aliquots of tetrabutylammonium halide stock
solution (0.75 M) were added, and an 1H NMR spectrum was
acquired after each addition. Care was taken to avoid water
absorption from the atmosphere. The changes in NH chemical
Consider the salts obtained by N-alkylation of
1 with 4-t-BuBn
halides; the ion-pair association constants in highly competitive
DMSO-d6 at 298 K are Cl- (1360 ( 280 M-1) > Br- (136 (
32 M-1) > I- (<10 M-1) as determined by NMR dilution experi-
ments.
(25) For discussions of near attack conformation, see: (a) Hur, S.;
Kahn, K.; Bruice, T. C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100,
2215-2219. (b) Schowen, R. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100,
1191-11932. (c) Hur, S.; Bruice, T. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 10540-10542. (d) Shurki, A.; Strajbl, M.; Villa, J.; Warshel, A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4097-4107. (e) Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.;
Bruice, T. C. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 10443-10448. (f) Guo, H.; Cui, Q.;
Lipscomb, W. N.; Karplus, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1508-
1511. (g) Ranaghan, K. E.; Mulholland, A. J. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1238-
1239.
(27) (a) Bazzicalupi, C.; Bencini, A.; Bianchi, A.; Danesi, A.;
Giorgi, C.; Lodeiro, C.; Pina, F.; Santarelli, S.; Valtancoli, B. Chem.
Commun. 2005, 2630-2632. (b) Garcia-Espana, E.; Gavina, P.; Latorre,
J.; Soriano, C.; Verdejo, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5082-5083. (c)
O’Neil, E. J.; Smith, B. D. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2006, 250, 3068-3080.
(28) (a) Artificial Enzymes; Breslow, R., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 2005.
(b) Cacciapaglia, R.; Di Stefano, S.; Mandolini, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004,
37, 113-122. (c) Motherwell, W. B.; Bingham, M. J.; Six, Y. Tetrahedron
2001, 57, 4663-4686. (d) Murakami, Y.; Kikuchi, J.; Hisaeda, Y.;
Hayashida, O. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 721-758.
(26) Haeffner, F.; Marquez, M.; Gonzalez, C. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007,
111, 268-272.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 72, No. 25, 2007 9667