A R T I C L E S
He et al.
Scheme 1. Polarized Substrates for Nazarov Cyclization
1) could be intercepted by various nucleophilic species.7,8 This
strategy is significant because trapping the intermediate cation
postpones elimination, such that both of the stereo-
centers created in the electrocyclic reaction are retained in the
product.
indicating multiple competitive reaction pathways. Better suc-
cess in the cyclization of these electron-poor substrates was
reported in two more recent studies: both Kerr17 and Aggarwal18
were able to achieve efficient cyclization of dienones bearing
electron-withdrawing groups using alternative Lewis acidic
promoters. However, Nazarov cyclizations of substrates bearing
both an electron-donating group at C-2 and an electron-
withdrawing group at C-4 had not been explored.
Our initial study19 and the closely related studies of Trauner,20
Tius,21 and Occhiato22 have established that divinyl ketones
bearing a heteroatom donor at one of the R-positions are indeed
more reactive and cyclize efficiently in the presence of catalytic
amounts of various Lewis acids. A full account of our study on
Nazarov cyclizations of polarized divinyl ketones of type 1P is
given in this article.
Inspired by the high reactivity engendered by the donor/
acceptor relationship of diene and dienophile in the Diels-Alder
reactions of Danishefsky9 and Rawal,10 we wondered whether
polarization or desymmetrization of the intermediate pentadienyl
cation 2 might improve the reactivity and selectivity of the
Nazarov cyclization. Synthesis and cyclization studies on a
divinyl ketone of type 1P, bearing an electron-donating group
at one R position (e.g., C-2, Scheme 1) and an electron-
withdrawing group at the other (e.g., C-4), were planned. It was
hoped that treatment of 1P with a Lewis acid would allow the
development of complementary orbital coefficients at the termini
of intermediate 2P, improving reactivity (Scheme 1). The
substituents at C-2 and C-4 would also desymmetrize the
oxyallyl cation (3P), which was expected to improve the
selectivity of the elimination step.
Before these studies were begun, little data concerning the
reactivity of dienones bearing electron-donating and electron-
withdrawing groups was available. It had been reported that
dienones bearing a C-2 heteroatom cyclized efficiently, although
like most other documented Nazarov cyclizations, a protic acid
medium or treatment with stoichiometic amounts of strong
Lewis acids was usually required to promote the reaction.11-13
The cyclization of C-4 carboalkoxy and carbamate-substituted
divinyl ketone substrates had been studied by Marino,14 Regan,15
and Takeda,16 who found that superstoichoimetric amounts of
the strong promoters SnCl4 and TMSI were required. The
reactions were typically slow (24 h) and low-yielding (<50%),
Results and Discussion
Development of the Catalytic Nazarov Cyclization of
Polarized Substrates. Initial screening was carried out on 2,4,6-
trimethoxyphenyl-substituted dihydropyran substrate 6. The
cyclization was very rapid (<1 min) even at room temperature
with stoichoimetric AlCl3, Al(OTf)3, Sc(OTf)3, and Cu(OTf)2,
as well as acetic acid, and the â-ketoester product 7 was isolated
in nearly quantitative yield (eq 2). Furthermore, highly efficient
cyclization of 6 was also observed upon treatment with 2 mol
% of either Cu(OTf)2, Sc(OTf)3, or Al(OTf)3 in CH2Cl2. The
reaction was fast (<5 min) and high yielding (>99%) in all
three cases. Since it was likely that triflic acid could also serve
as a catalyst for the cyclization, we carried out control
experiments to rule out the possibility of expeditious catalysis
by triflic acid, often present in the commercial Cu(OTf)2 reagent.
Thus, when a solution of Cu(OTf)2 was treated with excess
potassium carbonate prior to addition of substrate, the cyclization
behavior of 6 was unchanged.
(7) (a) Βender, J. Α.; Blize, A. E.; Browder, C. C.; Giese, S.; West, F. G. J.
Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2430. (b) Giese, S.; West, F. G. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 8393. (c) Bender, J. A.; Arif, A. M.; West, F. G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 7443. (d) Browder, C. C.; West, F. G. Synlett 1999, 1363.
(e) Wang, Y.; Arif, A. M.; West, F. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 876.
(f) Giese, S.; West, F. G. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 10221. (g) Giese, S.;
Kastrup, L.; Stiens, D.; West, F. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2000,
39, 1970. (h) Browder, C. C.; Marmsater, F. P.; West, F. G. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 3033. (i) Wang, Y.; Schill, B. D.; Arif, A. M.; West, F. G. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 2747. (j) Browder, C. C.; Marmsater, F. P.; West, F. G. Can.
J. Chem. 2004, 82, 375. (k) Yungai, A.; West, F. G. Tetrahedron Lett.
2004, 45, 5445. (l) White, T. D.; West, F. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46,
5629. (m) Rostami, A.; Wang, Y.; Arif. A. M. McDonald, R.; West, F. G.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 703.
(8) For other recent examples of interrupted Nazarov cyclization, see (a) Dhoro,
F.; Tius, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12472. and (b) Dhoro, F.;
Kristensen, T. E.; Stockmann, V.; Yap, G. P. A.; Tius, M. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 7256.
(9) (a) Danishefsky, S.; Kitahara, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7807. (b)
Danishefsky, S.; Kitahara, T.; Yan, C. F.; Morris, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1979, 101, 6996. (c) Danishefsky, S. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14,
400.
Encouraged by the successful catalytic Nazarov cyclization
of substrate 6, a series of dihydropyran substrates were prepared
to explore the scope of the method (Table 1). While it was
possible to effect the cyclization using a catalytic amount of a
number of different Lewis acids, we chose to study the reaction
using Cu(OTf)2 because of the documented performance of
copper (II)-chiral ligand complexes in asymmetric reaction
(10) Kozmin, S. A.; Janey, J. M.; Rawal, V. H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 3039.
(11) Τius, Μ. Α.; Κwok, Ì.-Κ.; Gu, X.-q.; Zhao, C. Synth. Commun. 1994,
24, 871.
(17) Kerr, D. J.; Metje, C.; Flynn, B. L. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1380.
(18) Aggarwal, V. K.; Beffield, A. J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 5075.
(19) He, W.; Sun, X.; Frontier, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14278-
14279; addition/correction J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10493.
(20) Liang, G. X.; Gradl, S. N.; Trauner, D. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4931.
(21) Bee, C.; Leclerc, E.; Tius, M. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4927.
(22) Occhiato, E. G.; Prandi, C.; Ferrali, A.; Guarna, A.; Venturello, P. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 9728.
(12) Casson, S.; Kocienski, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 1187.
(13) Kim, S.-H.; Cha, J. K. Synthesis 2000, 2113.
(14) a) Marino, J. P.; Lindermann, R. J. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 3696. (b)
Marino, J. P.; Lindermann, R. J. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4621.
(15) Andrews, J. F. P.; Regan, A. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 7731.
(16) Sakai, T.; Miyata, K.; Takeda, A. Chem. Lett. 1985, 1137.
9
1004 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 3, 2008