least in the ground state, by applying the pressure beyond a
certain limit. Subsequent photoexcitation of the resulting more
compact conformer, or analogous conformational changes in
the excited state, can lead to a distinctly different exciplex
conformation and therefore induce the discontinuous changes
observed in the ee at higher pressures.
Inspection of the electronic spectra of 3a under pressure
showed only a slight bathochromic peak shift and absorbance
enhancement, which are too small to confidently discuss the
spectroscopic discontinuity. Circular dichroism (CD) spectros-
copy, however, would be more sensitive to such conformational
changes, but the sapphire window used does not allow CD
spectral examination due to birefringence; probably, a diamond
window would be more suitable for such measurements.
The unprecedented discontinuous pressure dependence of the
ee found in the present study can be useful as an additional tool
for controlling the product chirality and ee, wherever such
conformational switching is induced by pressure. Further
studies to elucidate the detailed mechanism, as well as CD
spectral examination at high pressure, are currently in pro-
gress.
We thank Dr Guy A. Hembury for assistance in the
preparation of this manuscript.
Fig. 1 Pressure dependence of the ee of 1E (solid line) or 2EZ (broken line)
obtained upon enantiodifferentiating photoisomerization of 1Z or 2ZZ
sensitized by 3a (5,2), 3b (-) and 3c (:).
Notes and references
1 H. Rau, Chem. Rev., 1983, 83, 535.
2 Y. Inoue, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 741.
not a simple linear function of P over the entire pressure range
employed, but instead, in each case, affords a bent plot
approximated by two or three straight lines. These results
clearly indicate that the DDV‡ value (eqn. 1) and therefore the
sensitizing species and enantiodifferentiation mechanism differ
in each pressure range, even though the same chiral sensitizer is
used. In view of the discontinuity of the ln(kS/kR)-versus-P plot,
the pressure-induced change in viscosity or diffusion rate
constant, each of which is a continuous variable, does not
appear to be responsible for this unusual behavior.
3 S. R. L. Everitt and Y. Inoue, in Organic Molecular Photochemistry, ed.
V. Ramamurthy and K. Schanze, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999, p.
71.
4 Y. Inoue, T. Yokoyama, N. Yamasaki and A. Tai, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1989, 111, 6480.
5 Y. Inoue, N. Yamasaki, T. Yokoyama and A. Tai, J. Org. Chem., 1992,
57, 1332.
6 H. Tsuneishi, T. Hakushi, A. Tai and Y. Inoue, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2, 1995, 2057.
7 Y. Inoue, H. Tsuneishi, T. Hakushi and A. Tai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
119, 472.
In this context, it should be noted that the bending positions
observed in Fig. 1 are common to all the chiral sensitizers and
substrates employed, occurring at 200 and ca. 400 MPa. Hence,
the structural variations in the chiral auxiliaries or the substrate
structure cannot account for the discontinuous changes of
product ee. It is, however, the benzenetetracarboxylate moiety,
shared by all of the sensitizers, which appears most responsible.
In this light, it is found that the ester moiety of the alkyl
benzoate starts to fold into a more compact structure at the
transition pressures, as revealed by observing a discontinuous
change in the C = O stretching vibration by means of high-
pressure Raman spectroscopy.15 It is likely that, in the present
system, a similar conformational change occurs in the ester
moieties of each chiral benzenetetracarboxylate sensitizer, at
8 Y. Inoue, E. Matsushima and T. Wada, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120,
10687.
9 R. Hoffmann and Y. Inoue, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 10702.
10 S. Asaoka, H. Horiguchi, T. Wada and Y. Inoue, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2, 2000, 737.
11 S. Asaoka, M. Ooi, P. Jiang, T. Wada and Y. Inoue, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2, 2000, 77.
12 Y. Inoue, H. Ikeda, M. Kaneda, T. Sumimura, S. R. L. Everitt and C.
Wada, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 406.
13 Y. Inoue, T. Wada, S. Asaoka, H. Sato and J.-P. Pete, Chem. Commun.,
2000, 251.
14 R. van Eldik, T. Asano and W. J. le Noble, Chem. Rev., 1989, 89,
549.
15 V. L. Slager, H. C. Chang, Y. J. Kim and J. Jonas, J. Phys. Chem. B.,
1997, 101, 9774.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 1272–1273
1273