C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
1 within the phospholipid bilayer. We envision that the bis-
lithocholate linker in 1 provides the walls for the transmembrane
pore and a cation-filled G-quadruplex, formed upon hydrogen-bond
self-assembly, serves as a structural pillar that anchors the assembly
within the membrane.
In summary, ditopic guanosine-sterol 1 forms large and stable
channels. The smaller conductance values near 0.1 pS may arise
as ions are moved through the central channel of a G-quadruplex.3
However, pores that conduct on the 1-20 nS scale must necessarily
have diameters that are significantly larger than that provided by a
G4-quartet. It is tempting to suggest that assemblies like those
depicted in Figure 2, structures previously proposed to explain
formation of G4-quartet polymers,6 are responsible for the function
of 1. Regardless of the actual membrane-active structures, the
demonstration that 1 forms large and stable transmembrane channels
suggests that this nucleoside-sterol may well be able to allow larger
biomolecules to move in and out of liposomes and/or cells. We
are currently pursuing such studies.
Figure 4. Representative traces from voltage-clamp experiments indicating
distinct conductance values recorded in the presence of 1 at -10 mV in 1
M KCl. The number of open events are counted from a total of six
experiments. Three of the experiments were conducted by adding compound
1 (3.1 mM) to the cis side of the chamber after the planar bilayer membrane
was formed (Method 1 in Supporting Information). The other three
experiments were done using membranes that contained compound 1 (0.26
mM) premixed with the phospholipids used to form membrane (Method 2
in Supporting Information).
(pH 7.0). After either application of 1 to the cis side of the planar
bilayer (Method 1) or after premixing compound 1 with the lipid
mixture (Method 2), conductance states of different magnitudes
appeared and disappeared over a 2-3 h period. This pattern of
“open” and “closed” conductance is consistent with dynamic
formation and disintegration of self-assembled channels formed by
1.
Acknowledgment. J.D. thanks the Department of Energy for
support. J.D. and M.C. thank the Maryland Department of Economic
and Business Development for support from the Maryland Nano-
Biotechnology Initiative.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and
The magnitude and lifetimes of ion conductance supported by 1
varied during a single experiment (Figure 4). Channels with
conductance values of 0.1-1.0 nS typically had the shortest open
lifetimes (10-80 ms). These smaller channels always appeared
during initial events in any experiment. Larger channels with
conductance levels of 1-5 nS had much longer open lifetimes,
typically lasting longer than 10 s. Formation and disassembly of
pores with 1-5 nS conductance were also the most frequent events
observed during any experiment. We occasionally observed long
periods of larger conductance (>20 nS) in the three experiments
that used the Method 1 protocol for introduction of compound 1.
Analysis of data from these six experiments showed similar numbers
of increments and decrements at discrete conductance values,
consistent with the opening and closing of channels of the same
size. The most frequent conductance increments and decrements
were on the order of 1-5 nS. Significantly, addition of control 2
to planar bilayer membranes never resulted in measurable conduc-
tance. Apparently, the guanosine end groups in compound 1 are
essential for pore formation and transmembrane ion transport.
Reversal potentials, recorded in the presence of a 10-fold KCl
gradient, were measured to determine the ion selectivity of the
channels. The reversal potential, Erev, was essentially constant for
the 1-5 nS channels, suggesting no significant enlargement or
contracture of these pores during an experiment. The ion selectivity
of the 1-5 nS channels, calculated from the Goldman-Hodgkin-
Katz equation,14 revealed a cation selective pore (PK+/PCl- ) 6.38
( 0.30). The Hille equation was used to estimate a channel diameter
of ∼2.6-2.7 Å for the smaller channels (0.1 nS at 1 M KCl),5c,13,14
a value that is quite close to the diameter of the G4-quartet’s central
cavity. The pores that conduct in the nS range must, however, be
much larger than a G-quartet. For instance, the Hille diameter for
a single channel of 2.5 nS was estimated to be about 12 Å. Such
a single channel is significantly larger than the diameter of a G4-
quartet, suggesting that ion transport likely proceeds through larger
pore(s) that form upon self-assembly of guanosine-lithocholamide
References
(1) (a) Fyles, T. M. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007, 36, 335-347. (b) Sakai, N.;
Mareda, J.; Matile, S. Mol. BioSyst. 2007, 3, 658-666.
(2) (a) Bhosale, S.; Sisson, A. L.; Sakai, N.; Matile, S. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2006, 4, 3031-3039. (b) Davis, J. T.; Spada, G. P. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007,
36, 296-313. (c) Davis, J. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 668-
698.
(3) Sakai, N.; Kamikawa, Y.; Nishii, M.; Matsuoka, T.; Kato, T.; Matile, S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2218-2219.
(4) Kaucher, M. S.; Harrell, W. A., Jr.; Davis, J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 38-39.
(5) For exceptional synthetic channels that do show nS conductance, see: (a)
Baumeister, B.; Sakai, N.; Matile, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
1955-1958. (b) Schlesinger, P. H.; Ferdani, R.; Liu, J.; Pajewska, J.;
Pajewki, R.; Saito, M.; Shabany, H.; Gokel, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 1848-1849. (c) Fyles, T. C.; Tong, C. C. New J. Chem. 2007,
31, 655-661.
(6) (a) Ghoussob, A.; Lehn, J.-M. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5763-5765. (b)
Arnel-Herault, C.; Pasc, A.; Michau., M.; Cot, D.; Petit, E.; Barboiu, M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8409-8413.
(7) (a) Yoshii, M.; Yamamura, M.; Satake, A.; Kobuke, Y. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2004, 2, 2619-2623. (b) Kobuke, Y.; Nagatani, T., J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 5094-5101. (c) Goto, C.; Yamamura, M.; Satake, Y.; Kobuke,
Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 123, 12152-12159.
(8) Other cholates that are membrane-active ionophores: (a) Bandyopadhyay,
P.; Janout, V.; Zhang, L.; Sawlo, J. A.; Regen, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 12888-12889. (b) Koulov, A. V.; Lambert, T. N.; Shukla,
R.; Jain, M.; Boon, J. M.; Smith, B. D.; Li, H.; Sheppard, D. N.; Joss,
J.-B.; Clare, J. P.; Davis, A. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4931-
4933. (c) De Riccardis, F.; Di Filippo, M.; Garrisi, D.; Izzo, I.; Mancin,
F.; Pasquato, L.; Scrimin, P.; Tecilla, P. Chem. Commun. 2002, 3066-
3067.
(9) Kotch, F. W.; Sidorov, V.; Lam, Y. F.; Kayser, K. J.; Li, H.; Kaucher,
M. S.; Davis, J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15140-15150.
(10) For a review on the CD spectroscopy of G-quadruplexes: Gottarelli, G.;
Masiero, S.; Spada, G. P. Enantiomer 1999, 3, 429-438.
(11) Gottarelli, G., Masiero, S., Spada, G. P. Chem. Commun. 1995, 2555-
2557.
(12) (a) Lu, M., Guo, Q., Kallenbach, N. R. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 598-601.
(b) Porumb, H.; Monnot, M.; Fermandjian, S. Electrophoresis 2002, 23,
1013-1020.
(13) (a) Siskind, L. J.; Colombini, M., J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 38640-38644.
(b) Siskind, L. J.; Davoody, A.; Lewin, N.; Marshall, S.; Colombini, M.,
Biophys. J. 2003, 85, 1560-1575.
(14) Hille, B. Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes, 3rd ed.; Sinauer
Associates: Sunderland, MA, 2001.
JA7110702
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 10, 2008 2939