A. Huczyn´ski et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 874 (2008) 89–100
97
Table 4
100
50
0
Heat of formation (kcal/mol) of MON5 and its complexes with the cations
without (A) and with (B) the engagement of carbonyl group in
coordination process calculated by PM5 method (WinMopac 2003)
Complex
HOF (kcal/mol)
DHOF (kcal/mol)
MON5
ꢀ620.07
ꢀ496.83
ꢀ643.91
ꢀ496.83
ꢀ572.39
ꢀ478.01
ꢀ662.70
ꢀ478.01
ꢀ623.56
ꢀ503.13
ꢀ644.90
ꢀ503.13
ꢀ559.86
–
MON5 þ LiþuncomplexedðAÞ
MON5 þ LiþcomplexedðAÞ
MON5 þ LiþuncomplexedðBÞ
MON5 þ LiþcomplexedðBÞ
MON5 þ NaþuncomplexedðAÞ
MON5 þ NaþcomplexedðAÞ
MON5 þ NaþuncomplexedðBÞ
MON5 þ NaþcomplexedðBÞ
MON5 þ KþuncomplexedðAÞ
MON5 þ KþcomplexedðAÞ
MON5 þ KþuncomplexedðBÞ
MON5 þ KþcomplexedðBÞ
ꢀ147.09
ꢀ75.56
ꢀ184.70
ꢀ145.55
ꢀ141.77
ꢀ56.73
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
100
50
0
3508
3302
3351
3438
3497
3463
DHOF = HOFMON5 + M complexed ꢀ HOFMON5 + M uncomplexed; M, metal
cation.
3800
3700
3600
3500
3400
3300
3200
(A) Structure of MON5 complex in which the C1@O group is not
involved in coordination of metal cation.
(B) Structure of MON5 complex in which the C1@O group is involved in
coordination of metal cation.
100
50
0
this leads to a gain of entropy for the MON5–Na+ com-
plex. This might explain that Na+ forms the most stable
complexes with MON5 as also indicated by the ESI exper-
iments (Fig. 2).
1706
1733
1800
1750
1700
-1
1650
Wavenumber [cm
]
3.4. PM5 calculations
Fig. 4. FT-IR spectra of: (—) MON5, (- -) MON5–Li+, (ꢃ ꢃ ꢃ) MON5-Na+,
and (-ÆÆ-) MON5–K+ in the ranges of : (a) 4000–400 cmꢀ1; (b) m(OH) and
(c) m(C@O) stretching vibrations.
On the basis of the spectroscopic results, the heats of
formation (HOF) of the structures of MON5 and its com-
plexes with Li+, Na+ and K+ cations were calculated
(Table 4). Their values imply that the most stable com-
plexes in the gas phase (under the experimental conditions
similar to those of ESI measurements) are formed with
Na+ ꢁ Li+ ꢂ K+ cations. This result is in good agreement
with the ESI data discussed above. The DHOF values also
show that the structures of MON5 with cations in which
the carbonyl group is involved in the complexation process
are energetically less favourable than those in which the
carbonyl group is not involved. Only for the MON5–Na+
complexes the DHOF value of the structure involving the
carbonyl group in the complexation process is relatively
high indicating that such a structure should be taken into
account. This result is in good agreement with both the
ESI data and with the FT-IR observations.
The interatomic distances between the oxygen atoms
of MON5 and the cations along with the partial charges
at these atoms are given in Table 5. Analysis of these
values shows that some oxygen atoms such as OIV,
OVI, OVII and OIX are always involved in the coordina-
tion of different metal cations, whereas the OI, OII and
OIII play no role in this coordination process. The latter
refers to the A type structure in which the C1@O group
is not involved in the complexation of the metal cation.
If the OII oxygen atom from the C1@O carbonyl group
compared to the Li+ and the Na+ complex and only
slightly stronger as in the uncomplexed MON5. The posi-
tion of the band assigned to the m(C@O) vibrations at
1733 cmꢀ1, in the spectra of MON5 and its complexes with
Li+ and K+ cations, is almost unchanged (Fig. 4c), demon-
strating that the oxygen atom of the C@O ester group is
not engaged in the complexation process of these cations.
The spectrum of the MON5–Na+ complex is intriguing.
Besides the band at ca. 1733 cmꢀ1, representing structure
A (Scheme 5a), in which the C@O ester group does not
contribute to the complexation process, a new less intense
band at ca. 1706 cmꢀ1 appears. This band can be assigned
to the m(C@O) vibrations in structure B of the MON5–Na+
complex in which the carbonyl group interacts with the
Na+ cation (Scheme 5b). The low intensity of this new
band, however, indicates that structure B is not predomi-
nant in acetonitrile solution. The presence of these two
bands suggests the existence of an dynamic equilibrium
between structure A and structure B of the MON5–Na+
complex.
These two structures are only two extreme conforma-
tions among many others realized with different probabili-
ties. In contrast to all other complexes investigated here,