1512 Organometallics, Vol. 27, No. 7, 2008
Beaupérin et al.
t
of Fc(P)4 Bu (3.38 × 10-5 mol, 35 mg) and [PdCl(η3-C3H5)]2 (1.69
× 10-5 mol, 6.18 mg), under argon, affords the coupling products.
Pure products were obtained after addition of water, extraction with
organic solvents, separation, drying, concentration, and chroma-
tography on silica gel.
phosphine ligands are even more rare.10a The dynamic behavior
of these species in solution was investigated by VT-31P NMR
and showed that the CuI fragment has a fluxional behavior over
three of the four phosphorus atoms. This type of dynamic
t
activity was interestingly exemplified before with Fc(P)4 Bu in
t
palladium coordination chemistry.6 The synthetic and charac-
terization studies were put in relation with the role of the ligand
Tetraphosphine Fc(P)4 Bu. The ligand 1,1′,2,2′-tetrakis(diphe-
t
nylphosphino)-4,4′-di-tert-butylferrocene, Fc(P)4 Bu, was prepared
following the synthesis reported in the literature.6,15 Chemical shifts
t
Fc(P)4 Bu in Pd/Cu-cocatalyzed alkynylation reactions to suggest
of pure product are as follow:8 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 6.40–8.90 (m,
that under the conditions we used interferences of CuI with the
ligand cannot be totally excluded.
40 H, Ph), 4.14, 4.05 (s, 2 H each, Cp), 0.70 (s, 18H, tBu). 31P{1H}
(CDCl3): δ -28.6, -32.2 (AA′BB′, 3JAB ) 3JA′B′ ) 74 Hz,
J ′
AA
TS
From the catalytic performances it was clearly shown that 1
mol % of complex 1 is far more efficient and selective for
Sonogashira coupling than 5 mol % CuI in the coupling of a
set of electronically neutral, activated, and deactivated aryl
bromides to phenylacetylene. It avoids the concurrent and
deleterious consumption of phenylacetylene by formation of
diyne or enynes. Several experiments showed that the use of
CuI (or complex 1) in the absence of a palladium source does
not produce any reaction (either aryl alkynylation or pheny-
lacetylene dimerization). Additionally, the use of complex 1
offers practical advantages: it has been used in only 1 mol %
against 5 mol % for CuI, and its enhanced stability to air allows
a much easier weighing and stocking compared to strictly
anhydrous CuI.
Finally, these results suggest that a more systematic examina-
tion of the interaction of copper(I) halides with ligands primarily
devoted to palladium stabilization in reactions containing the
two metals would be of high mechanistic interest. This is
especially true for ligands incorporating nitrogen atoms, which
are susceptible to transfer to copper,18 as well as for labile
monophosphines such as PPh3,3a,17 and for alkynylations
conducted in acetonitrile solvent,19 in which robust copper-
phosphine complexes might be formed. Finally, enhanced
performances could be expected from a ligand chemistry
directed to copper in complement to palladium or even from
well-defined Pd/Cu bimetallic complexes.
) 60 Hz). UV–visible (nm, CH2Cl2): 228, 279 (shoulder), 466. In
the ground state, the electronic structure has a strong metal character
and is described as being (3e2g)4(5a1g)2. The two lower energy
absorption bands are assigned to the 5a1g f 4e1g and 3e2g f 4e1g
transition, respectively; these transitions are metal-centered. The
intense LMCT band near 220 nm is assigned to transitions from a
π-orbital ligand to the 4e1g metal level.
Copper Complexes Synthesis: 1. Anhydrous copper iodide
conserved under an argon atmosphere (0.28 g, 1.470 mmol, 4 equiv)
t
and Fc(P)4 Bu (0.4 g, 0.387 mmol) were dissolved in degassed
acetonitrile (20 mL). The mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 3 h,
after which time a pale yellow precipitate was visible. After cooling,
the mixture was filtered over Celite and the resulting solution
concentrated in Vacuo. After two days in a freezer at -18 °C, 1
crystallizes as air-stable orange needles in 54% yield (0.25 g, 0.21
mmol), easily separable from cocrystallized square-shaped, white,
transparent crystals of the inorganic complex catena-[(µ3-iodo)(ac-
etonitrile-N)copper(I)], arising from excess CuI. C66H62P4FeCuI
(MW 1225.39, exact mass 1224.149): m/z 1113.236 (M+ - I +
O); 1097.243 (M+ - I), simulated 1097.244 (σ ) 0.058). Anal.
Calcd: C 64.69, H 5.10. Found: C 64.62, H 4.97. From single
1
crystals (see spectrum in the Supporting Information), H NMR
(CDCl3 at 27 °C): δ 6.80–8.10 (m, 40 H, Ph), 4.25, 4.14 (s, 2 H
t
each, Cp), 0.82 (s, 18H, Bu), residual uncoordinated acetonitrile
gives an intense singlet at 2.02 ppm. 31P{1H} (CDCl3, at 27 °C):
δ -23.4 (s), -24.6 (m, br). UV–visible (nm, CH2Cl2): 232, 298
(shoulder), 467. Since copper(I) has fully occupied d-orbitals, no
d f d transition occurs for the complexes in the visible region and
the UV–visible is similar to the spectrum of the starting ferrocenyl
ligand. The electronic spectrum for 1 is only the signature of the
ligand; no metal–ligand charge transfer (MLCT) occurs. As evoked
for the UV–visible analysis of Cu(I), fully occupied d-orbitals give
a diamagnetic EPR-silent complex at 115 K, which is in total
agreement with NMR and X-ray diffraction analyses, and shows
that no oxidation to Cu(II) occurred. 1b was eventually obtained
Experimental Section
General Considerations. The reactions were carried out in oven-
dried (115 °C) glassware under an argon atmosphere using Schlenk
and vacuum-line techniques. Except for methanol and acetonitrile
(which were deoxygenated by nitrogen freezing/vacuum) the
solvents were distilled over appropriate drying and deoxygenating
agents prior to use. 1H (300.13 and 600.13 MHz) and 31P (121.49
and 242.94 MHz) including variable-temperature NMR experiments
were performed in CDCl3 or CD2Cl2 on a 600 MHz Bruker Avance
II and a 300 MHz Bruker Avance. NMR, UV (Varian Cary 50
spectrophotometer), elemental analyses, and electrospray mass
spectrometry (on a Bruker microOTOF-Q instrument) were per-
formed at the Centre de Spectrométrie Moléculaire (CSM) of the
Institut de Chimie Moléculaire de l’Université de Bourgogne
(ICMUB-UMR CNRS 5260). The UV-visible characterization of
the copper complexes was performed in dichloromethane. Continu-
ous wave (CW) EPR experiments were recorded in frozen solution
(115 K) on a Bruker ELEXSYS 500 spectrometer equipped with a
4122 SHQE/0405 X-band resonant cavity operating at 9.30 GHz
(6 mW power, 100 kHz modulation).
t
concomitantly with 1 from a pool of Fc(P)4 Bu contaminated with
the unforeseen ligand 1,1′,2,3′-tetrakis(diphenylphosphino)-4,4′-di-
tert-butylferrocene. 1,1′,2,3′-Tetrakis(diphenylphosphino)-4,4′-di-
tert-butylferrocene is formed as a byproduct upon modification of
t
the synthetic procedure15a to produce Fc(P)4 Bu (as explained in
t
Schemes 5 and 6). In particular, a high concentration of BuCpLi
(1.43 × 10-3 mol · mL-1 in toluene) was used in the first step of
the synthesis. C66H62P4FeCuI (MW 1225.39, exact mass 1224.149):
m/z 1113.246 (M+ - I + O), simulated 1113.239 (σ ) 0.388);
1097.254 (M+ - I). From single crystals (see spectrum in the
Supporting Information), 1H NMR (CDCl3 at 27 °C): δ 6.50–8.25
(m, 40H, Ph), 3.95, 4.09, 4.47, 4.58 (s, 1H each, Cp), 0.80 (s, 18H,
tBu). 31P{1H} (CDCl3, at 27 °C): δ -20.7 (s), -22.9 (m, br), -28.3
(m, br).
Sonogashira Reactions. The reaction of aryl halide (3.38 × 10-3
mol), phenylacetylene (2 equiv, 0.75 mL), K2CO3 (2 equiv, 0.935
g), and CuI (1.69 × 10-4 mol, 32 mg, or complex 1, 3.38 × 10-5
mol, 41 mg) at 130 °C during 24 h in DMF (10 mL) in the presence
X-ray Crystallographic Structure Determination of 1 and
1b. Intensity data were collected on a Nonius Kappa CCD at 115
K. The structures were solved by direct methods (SIR92)20 and
refined with full-matrix least-squares methods based on F2 (SHELXL-
(18) Batey, R. A.; Shen, M.; Lough, A. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1411.
(19) DeVasher, R. B.; Moore, L. R.; Shaughnessy, K. H. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 7919.
(20) Altomare, A.; Cascarano, G.; Giacovazzo, C.; Guagliardi, A. J. Appl.
Crystallogr. 1993, 26, 343.