1532 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2008, Vol. 51, No. 6
Letters
at the N-methylpipecolinic acid and tubuvaline positions. The
modifications to tubuvaline are notable, since they further
simplify its structure, and the N-methylpipecolinic acid changes
demonstrate the effects of stereochemistry and the N-methyl
group on activity. Two analogues, 22a (FT-023) and 22c (FT-
022), retain a potent level of cytotoxicity, and their antitubulin
activity is equipotent to HTI-286 and combretastatin A4.
Additional modifications to the tubulysin scaffold and further
biological properties of analogues 22a and 22c will reported in
due course.
Acknowledgment. This research was generously supported
by Grant RSG-05-105-01-CDD (to R.A.F.) from the American
Cancer Society and was supported in part by intramural funds
from the National Institute of Child Health and Human
Development, NIH. The authors thank Beverly G. Ostrowski
for assistance with the NMR instruments. Funding for NMR
instrumentation in the Department of Biochemistry, Molecular
Biology, and Biophysics was provided by the University of
Minnesota Medical School, NSF (Grant BIR-961477), and the
Minnesota Medical Foundation.
Figure 1. Inhibition of tubulin polymerization by 22a and 22c. Rat
brain tubulin (10 µM) was mixed with various concentrations (0.5, 1,
2, and 4 µM) of test compounds on ice in 0.8 M sodium glutamate,
pH 6.6, and 0.4 mM GTP. Samples were warmed to 33 °C, and optical
density at 350 nm was followed with time in a SpectraMax Plus plate
reading spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Only
one concentration is shown for clarity, 1 µM for all compounds: [ )
control, 2 ) 22a, 9 ) 22c, × ) HTI-286. Combretastatin A4 is not
shown.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures
and spectral data for 4, 5, 7–12, 14–16, 18–20, 22a–h, and 23a–d;
1H and 13C NMR spectra for 4, 5, 8–12, 14–16, 18–20, 22a–h,
and 23a–d; and experimental procedures for biological testing. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
those with an L-amino acid (22b and 22d). The ring size of
N-methylpipecolinic acid can be varied, provided the N-methyl
group and stereochemical requirements are followed. Com-
pounds incorporating N-methyl-D-proline (22a) and N-Me-D-
pipecolinic acid (22c) are roughly equipotent.
At the tubuvaline position, significant modifications are
tolerated. The cytotoxicity of 22a and 22c shows that a tertiary
amide is not required, and the acetoxy or hydroxy groups present
in the natural products can be replaced with a ketone. The latter
change is significant, since it eliminates the need for a
stereogenic center that is challenging to install.
The most active compounds in this series, 22a (FT-023) and
22c (FT-022), have potent cytotoxicity against 1A9 ovarian
cancer cells; however, they are notably less cytotoxic than HTI-
286, a hemiasterlin analogue presently in phase I clinical trials.
To confirm their mechanism of action, analogues 22a and
22c were also tested for the ability to inhibit tubulin polymer-
ization in vitro (Figure 1).21 Under these conditions, the IC50
obtained was approximately 1.0 µM for 22a, 1.8 µM for 22c,
1.0 µM for HTI-286, and 1.1 µM for combretastatin A4. These
results establish inhibition of tubulin polymerization as the
mechanism of tubulysin analogues 22a and 22c.
Interestingly, the relatively equivalent IC50 values of 22a and
22c to HTI-286 in the tubulin polymerization assay do not
correlate to their cytotoxicity. The reasons for this discrepancy
are not known at this time. One potential explanation is that
22a and 22c have decreased permeability across the cell
membrane.
These results confirm and extend the preliminary structure–
activity data reported for two small series of tubulysin D11 and
H10 analogues. The cytotoxicity and tubulin inhibition data for
22a and 22c are comparable to those found for two other
tubulysin analogues, although different cell lines and assay
conditions were used.10 We show here that additional modifica-
tions to tubuvaline are tolerated. These changes, the lack of a
tertiary amide, and elimination of a stereogenic center simplify
the processes required for the synthesis of tubulysin analogues.
Synthesis of 22a and 22c was achieved in 12 linear steps from
commercially available materials, which compares favorably to
the total syntheses of natural tubulysins.22
References
(1) Sasse, F.; Steinmetz, H.; Heil, J.; Höfle, G.; Reichenbach, H.
Tubulysins, new cytotoxic peptides from myxobacteria acting on
microtubuli. Production, isolation, physico-chemical and biological
properties. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 879–885.
(2) Steinmetz, H.; Glaser, N.; Herdtweck, E.; Sasse, F.; Reichenbach, H.;
Höfle, G. Isolation, crystal and solution structure determination, and
biosynthesis of tubulysinsspowerful inhibitors of tubulin polymeri-
zation from myxobacteria. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4888–
4892.
(3) Kaur, G.; Hollingshead, M.; Holbeck, S.; Schauer-Vukasinovic, V.;
Camalier, R. F.; Dömling, A.; Agarwal, S. Biological evaluation of
tubulysin A: a potential anticancer and antiangiogenic natural product.
Biochem. J. 2006, 396, 235–242.
(4) Khalil, M. W.; Sasse, F.; Luensdorf, H.; Elnakady, Y. A.; Reichenbach,
H. Mechanism of action of tubulysin, an antimitotic peptide from
myxobacteria. ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 678–683.
(5) Peltier, H. M.; McMahon, J. P.; Patterson, A. W.; Ellman, J. A. The
total synthesis of tubulysin D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16018–
16019.
(6) Dömling, A.; Beck, B.; Eichelberger, U.; Sakamuri, S.; Menon, S.;
Chen, Q.-Z.; Lu, Y.; Wessjohann, L. A. Total synthesis of tubulysin
U and V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7235–7239.
(7) Dömling, A.; Beck, B.; Eichelberger, U.; Sakamuri, S.; Menon, S.;
Chen, Q.-Z.; Lu, Y.; Wessjohann, L. A. Total synthesis of tubulysin
U and V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2347-2348 (Corrigendum).
(8) Sani, M.; Fossati, G.; Huguenot, F.; Zanda, M. Total synthesis of
tubulysins U and V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3526–3529.
(9) Wipf, P.; Wang, Z. Total synthesis of N14-desacetoxytubulysin H. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 1605–1607.
(10) Wang, Z.; McPherson, P. A.; Raccor, B. S.; Balachandran, R.; Zhu,
G.; Day, B. W.; Vogt, A.; Wipf, P. Structure-activity and high-content
imaging analyses of novel tubulysins. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2007,
70, 75–86.
(11) Patterson, A. W.; Peltier, H. M.; Sasse, F.; Ellman, J. A. Design,
synthesis, and biological properties of highly potent tubulysin D
analogues. Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13, 9534–9541.
(12) Wipf, P.; Takada, T.; Rishel, M. J. Synthesis of the tubuvaline-
tubuphenylalanine (Tuv-Tup) fragment of tubulysin. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 4057–4060.
(13) Guibourdenche, C.; Podlech, J.; Seebach, D. Nucleosides, with
intermediates generated by Wolff rearrangement of amino acid derived
diazo ketones: Preparation of ꢀ-amino acid derivatives. Liebigs Ann.
1996, 1121–1129.
In summary, we report here the synthesis and initial biological
evaluation of eight tubulysin analogues that incorporate changes
(14) Limal, D.; Quesnel, A.; Briand, J.-P. Direct synthesis of N-protected
ꢀ-amino dimethylhydroxamates: application to the solid-phase