Angewandte
Chemie
(entry 6).[10] When the reaction of 1a with 2a was carried out
at 258Cwith 20 mol% of the Rh catalyst, almost complete
enantioselectivity was observed (Table 2, entry 2).
Table 1: Screening ofligands for the Rh-catalyzed [2 +2+2] cycloaddition
of 1a with ethyl pyruvate (2a).
We found that 1,6-enynes with tosylamide (1a; Table 2,
entries 1–5), malonate (1b, entries 7–9), and oxygen (1c and
1d, entries 10–13) linkages could be used in the cycloaddition.
With respect to the substituent R1 at the alkyne terminus, 1,6-
enynes substituted not only with methyl (1a; Table 2,
entries 1–5), but also with phenyl and 4-bromophenyl
groups (1c and 1b, entries 7–11), participated in the reaction.
In the case of the 4-bromophenyl-substituted 1,6-enyne 1b,
improved yield and enantioselectivity were observed when
the reaction was carried out at 258Cwith 20 mol% of the Rh
catalyst (Table 2, entry 9). The reaction of the methoxycar-
bonyl-substituted 1,6-enyne 1d with 2a furnished the corre-
sponding dihydropyran 3da in low yield as a result of the
rapid [2+2+2] homocycloaddition of 1d (Table 2, entry 12);
however, when the highly electron deficient ketone 2d was
used, the corresponding dihydropyran 3dd was obtained in
good yield (entry 13). Although the 1,6-enyne 1e with a
monosubstituted alkene moiety reacted with 2a, the alcohol
5ea was obtained as the major product along with the
expected dihydropyran 3ea (Table 2, entry 14). Furthermore,
the use of diethyl ketomalonate (2d) instead of 2a led to the
almost exclusive formation of the alcohol 5ed (Table 2,
entry 15).[11,12]
Entry
Ligand
Yield [%][a]
ee [%]
1
2
3
4
5
(R)-binap
>99
22
<10
58
91
92
–
96
95
(R)-tol-binap[b]
(R)-xyl-binap[c]
(R)-segphos[d]
(R)-H8-binap[e]
>99
[a] Yield ofthe isolated product. [b] 2,2 ’-Bis(di-p-tolylphosphanyl)-1,1’-
binaphthyl. [c] 2,2’-Bis(di(3,5-xylyl)phosphanyl)-1,1’-binaphthyl. [d] (4,4’-
Bi-1,3-benzodioxole)-5,5’-diylbis(diphenylphosphane). [e] 2,2’-Bis(diphe-
nylphosphanyl)-5,5’,6,6’,7,7’,8,8’-octahydro-1,1’-binaphthyl.
cyclooctadiene, Ts=p-toluenesulfonyl.
cod=1,5-
We then explored the scope of this process with respect to
the two substrates (Table 2). Not only ethyl pyruvate (2a;
Table 2, entry 1), but also 2,3-butanedione (2b; entry 3) and
diethyl ketomalonate (2d, entry 5), underwent the desired
reaction with 1a to furnish the expected dihydropyran in high
yield; however, the reaction of ethyl phenylglyoxylate (2c)
with 1a gave the expected dihydropyran 3ac in low yield
(Table 2, entry 4), and acetone (2e) failed to react with 1a
We applied this regio-, diastereo-, and enantioselective
[2+2+2] cycloaddition to the synthesis of the enantiomeri-
cally enriched spirocyclic com-
pound 3cf by using 1-methylisatin
(2 f) as the carbonyl substrate
(Scheme 3).[13] Importantly, neither
the regioisomer 4 nor the other
diastereomer was detected in the
crude product mixture for this reac-
tion or any of those described in
Table 2. The absolute configuration
of the dihydropyran product (À)-
3ab was determined by the anom-
Table 2: RhI+/(R)-H8-binap-catalyzed regio-, diastereo-, and enantioselective [2+2+2] cycloaddition of
1,6-enynes 1 with ketones 2.
Entry 1 (Z, R1, R2)
2 (R3, E)
3
Yield [%][a]
ee [%]
95
>99
98
97
97
–
98
alous
(Figure 1.)[14]
Scheme 4 depicts
dispersion
method
1
1a (NTs, Me, Me)
2a (Me, CO2Et)
2a (Me, CO2Et)
2b (Me, Ac)[d]
2c (Ph, CO2Et)
2d (CO2Et, CO2Et)
2e (Me, Me)[f]
(À)-3aa
(À)-3aa
>99
91
73
24
89
<1
49
33
2[b,c] 1a (NTs, Me, Me)
a
possible
3
4
5
6
7
8
1a (NTs, Me, Me)
1a (NTs, Me, Me)
1a (NTs, Me, Me)
1a (NTs, Me, Me)
(3R,6S)-(À)-3ab[e]
(+)-3ac
mechanism for the selective forma-
tion of the dihydropyran (3R,6S)-
3ab: The 1,6-enyne 1a reacts with
the rhodium center of the catalyst
to form the rhodacyclopentene A as
(À)-3ad
3ae
1b (C(CO2Me)2, Ar,[g] Me) 2a (Me, CO2Et)
1b (C(CO2Me)2, Ar,[g] Me) 2b (Me, Ac)[d]
(+)-3ba
(+)-3bb
(+)-3ba
92
9[b,c] 1b (C(CO2Me)2, Ar,[g] Me) 2a (Me, CO2Et)
82
>99
a
result of a steric interaction
between the Rh-CH2 moiety and
the equatorial P-Ph group of (R)-
H8-binap. Subsequently, 2,3-butane-
dione (2b) coordinates to A to form
complex B. The insertion of 2b
followed by the reductive elimina-
tion of rhodium then furnishes
(3R,6S)-3ab.
10
11
12
13
1c (O, Ph, Me)
1c (O, Ph, Me)
2a (Me, CO2Et)
2d (CO2Et, CO2Et)
2a (Me, CO2Et)
2d (CO2Et, CO2Et)
2a (Me, CO2Et)[d]
(+)-3ca
(+)-3cd
67
64
17
>99
96
98
93
1d (O, CO2Me, Me)
1d (O, CO2Me, Me)
(À)-3da
(À)-3dd
(À)-3ea
61
14[b,h] 1e (NTs, Me, H)
25 (30[i])
94
(>99[i,j], 81[i,k]
– (52[l])
)
15[b,h] 1e (NTs, Me, H)
2d (CO2Et, CO2Et)[d]
3ed
<1 (70[l])
[a] Yield ofthe isolated product. [b] Catalyst: 20 mol%. [c] The reaction was carried out at 25 8C in
CH2Cl2. [d] Compound 2: 2 equivalents. [e] The absolute configuration of (À)-3ab was determined by X-
ray crystallographic analysis (Figure 1). [f] Acetone (2e) was used as both substrate and solvent. [g] Ar=
4-BrC6H4. [h] Ligand: (R)-binap. [i] Data for 5ea (d.r. 2.8:1). [j] The ee value ofthe major diastereomer.
[k] The ee value ofthe minor diastereomer. [l] Data of r 5ed.
Next, we examined the reaction
of 1,6-enynes with electron-rich aryl
ketones (Table 3). In analogy with
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1312 –1316
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1313