ResponsiWe Salycilaldimine-Copper(II) Soft Materials
Scheme 3
them irreversible. The |Ipc/Ipa| peak ratio cannot be calcu-
lated accurately, but visual inspection suggests that the
intensity of the anodic peak is greater than that of the
cathodic peak indicating that |Ipc/Ipa| < 1. It implies that a
smaller concentration of the phenolate species is present at
the surface of the electrode in the time scale of the
experiment because of either depletion or chemical trans-
formation. Two well-shaped processes are observed for 3 at
0.53 and 0.83 V versus Fc+/Fc. These seem to be quasi-
reversible because ∆Ep reaches 0.10 V at 100 mV · s-1,
slightly larger than those values observed experimentally for
the Fc+/Fc couple under identical conditions. The quasi-
reversibility is supported by an increase in the peak separation
at higher scan rates with |Ipc/Ipa| values ranging from 1.27
at 100 mV · s-1 to 1.48 at 300 mV · s-1 for the first redox
process. The insertion of bulky groups intended to enhance
the amphiphilic properties in 4 appears to compromise the
redox reversibility of the compound. The first ligand-centered
peak is comparable to that of 3, but a peak separation ∆Ep
of 0.14 V (|Ipc/Ipa| ) 1.65), thus comparable to that of 1,
renders it irreversible. This irreversibility is increased in the
second process. It is possible that the presence of tris(dode-
cyloxy)phenyl substituents increases the distance between
the redox-active core of the molecule and the electrode
surface, decreasing the rate of interfacial electron transfer,
as seen in dendrimeric porphyrins.29 From the point of view
of redox reversibility, 3′ can be considered the best system.
The ligand-centered processes shift to more positive poten-
tials, namely 0.29 and 0.48 V versus Fc+/Fc with separation
peaks ∆Ep ) 0.09 V and |Ipc/Ipa| ) 1.21, thus well within
the limits observed for the Fc+/Fc couple.
The switch-like activity is fundamental for potential uses
in information storage and appears to depend heavily on the
geometry adopted by the central atom. Octahedral systems
tend to show rather limited switch-like cyclability, whereas
five-coordinate systems6 display reversible processes at 0.63
and 0.81 V vs Fc+/Fc with minor decay after 20–50 cycles.
To the best of our knowledge, the cyclability of square planar
copper-phenolate systems is not known. On the basis of the
data presented above, 3 and 3′ display good reversibility in
the ligand-centered processes. Experiments were attempted
cycling fifty times the two waves in a switch-like process.
In spite of the initial results with 3, a shift of up to 0.17 V
can be detected between the first and the fiftieth cycle
(Supporting Information Figure S2). The observed shift
suggests a small but constant decay that might limit the use
of this compound in responsive films. An excellent result
was achieved with 3′ in which no significant changes (0.04
V) were detected after 50 cycles, thus indicating that
decomposition of the generated species in the time scale of
the voltammetry experiment did not take place. These results
suggest that cycling of the phenoxyl species is viable in a
flexible four-coordinate geometry and in noncoordinating
solvents. Pending characterization of the amphiphilic proper-
ties of these two compounds, formation and study of
Langmuir–Blodgett films of 3 and 3′ will be pursued.
Electronic Structure Calculations. A series of compu-
tational calculations were run to correlate the experimental
data observed for the ligand-centered redox properties of
complexes 1, 3, 3′, and 4 with their electronic nature. The
B3LYP/6–311+G(d) level of theory30 was employed to
handle negatively charged species using the GAUSSIAN
suite.31 Geometries were fully minimized, without symmetry
constraints, using standard methods.32 It is assumed that all
phenolate f phenoxyl processes described above will depend
solely or mainly upon the relative energies of the HOMO
orbitals of the ligand, from where electrons are withdrawn
in an oxidative process, and that the higher the energy of
the orbital, the more energetically affordable is the oxidation.
Therefore, the models are nonmetallated and simplified
versions of the deprotonated phenolate ligands as shown in
Scheme 3. Considering that 1 shows the more positive
potential, the HOMO orbital of the equivalent model system
should be the lowest in energy and will display the lowest
comparative energy. The model for 3 (also related to 4) yields
a higher comparative energy and that of 3′ exhibits the
highest energy—therefore the most affordable oxidation
process—in excellent agreement with the observed experi-
mental trends. For 1 and 3, π-delocalization seems to play
an important role. One can conclude that energetically
favorable oxidations can be achieved by replacing the sCdO
by sCdNR groups attached to the phenolate ring. Similarly,
(30) (a) Becke, A. D. Phys. ReV. A 1988, 38, 3098. (b) Becke, A. D.
J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. (c) Lee, T.; Yang, W. T.; Parr, R. G.
Phys. ReV. B 1988, 37, 785. (d) Ditchfield, R.; Hehre, W. R.; Pople,
J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54, 724. (e) Gordon, M. S. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 1980, 76, 163. (f) Hariharan, P. C.; Pople, J. A. Theo. Chim.
Acta. 1973, 28, 213. (g) Hariharan, P. C.; Pople, J. A. Mol. Phys.
1974, 27, 209. (h) Hehre, W. R.; Ditchfield, R.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem.
Phys. 1972, 56, 225.
(31) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.;
Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.;
Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.;
Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa,
J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene,
M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.;
Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev,
O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala,
P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.;
Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas,
O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.;
Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.;
Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.;
Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.;
Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen,
W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. GAUSSIAN 03;
Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2003.
(29) Pollak, K. W.; Leon, J. W.; Frechet, J. M. J.; Maskus, M.; Abruna,
H. D. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 30.
(32) Schlegel, H. B. J. Comput. Chem. 1982, 3, 214.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 47, No. 8, 2008 3123