1496 Organometallics, Vol. 18, No. 8, 1999
Elschenbroich et al.
Ta ble 1. Selected Bon d Len gth s (p m ) a n d Bon d
An gles (d eg) for (C5H5As)2Ti (2)a
Sch em e 1
Ti1-C2
Ti1-C6
Ti1-C8
Ti1-C12
Ti1-C3
Ti1-C5
Ti1-C9
Ti1-C11
Ti1-C4
Ti1-C10
Ti1-As1
Ti1-As7
As1‚‚‚As7
225.4(14)
225.8(3)
As1-C2
C2-C3
192.0(12)
138.7(19)
147.0(20)
141.2(17)
142.5(14)
188.3(2)
189.7(12)
145.8(19)
142.0(20)
139.4(17)
146.4(18)
184.5(16)
231.8(14)
227.1(12)
227.2(12)
227.6(13)
228.1(13)
226.0(14)
227.7(13)
227.6(13)
258.4(3)
C3-C4
C4-C5
C5-C6
As1-C6
As7-C8
C8-C9
C9-C10
C10-C11
C11-C12
As7-C12
limited thermal stability, decomposing at 120 °C, 3 may
be sublimed and is stable up to 268 °C. Correspondingly,
the molecular ion 2+ in the mass spectrum shows an
abundance of 38%, whereas 3+ constitutes the base
peak.
259.1(3)
336.6(2)
b
C2-As1-C6
94.2(5)
C8-As7-C12
96.4(6)
C5As(centroid)-Ti1-C5As(centroid)
C5As(centroid)-Ti3-C5As(centroid)
C5As(centroid)-Ti4-C5As(centroid)
175.6(5)
176.1(5)
171.0(4)
An aspect of considerable interest in the class of bis-
(η6-heteroarene)metal complexes is the question of
whether interannular “secondary bonding”6 between the
heavier group 15 elements could stabilize the syn-
periplanar conformation. The As‚‚‚As interaction in 2
is expected to be small though, since in the related class
of arsametallocenes conformational preference is con-
trolled by the extent of ring substitution by methyl
groups; 2,2′,5,5′-tetramethyl-1,1′-diarsaferrocene in the
crystal adopts the eclipsed synperiplanar conformation
(C2v),7 whereas 2,2′,3,3′,4,4′,5,5′-octamethyl-1,1′-diarsa-
ferrocene takes the staggered antiperiplanar form (C2h).8
Our previous attempts to derive structural information
for unsubstituted bis(heteroarene)metal complexes were
frustrated by disorder problems.4,9,10 Similar problems
were initially encountered with crystals of 2, a specimen
of which at 223 K proved to be monoclinic with two
molecules in the unit cell, titanium residing at a
crystallographic center of symmetry. Severe rotational
disorder prevented unequivocal refinement, however.
When the temperature was lowered to 123 K, a transi-
tion into a twinned triclinic phase takes place which
yielded to X-ray diffraction and refinement. Three of the
four molecules in the asymmetric unit are now ordered;
the fourth molecule adopts the same conformation as
the former with 83% occupancy, while the As atom is
distributed over the different ring positions at 17%
occupancy. The structure of 2 is depicted in Figure 1;
selected bond lengths and angles are collected in Table
1. The most important features are the eclipsed syn-
periplanar conformation of 2 and the intramolecular
interannular As‚‚‚As distances (322, 337, 338 pm),
which are considerably smaller than the sum of the van
der Waals radii (385 pm11a-40011b pm) and fall short
of the As‚‚‚As distance of 362 pm in 2,2′,5,5′-tetram-
ethyl-1,1′-diarsaferrocene.7 The juxtaposition of the As
a
As a representative example the dimensions of the species
containing Ti1 are given here. For the remaining data see the
Supporting Information. Mean values for the species Ti1, Ti3, and
Ti4: As-Cortho, 189 pm; Cortho-Cmeta, 141 pm; Cmeta-Cpara, 143 pm;
Cortho- As-Cortho, 94.5°. Species Ti2 has been excluded because of
rotational disorder of one ring. Data for the free ligand C5H5As
(1): As-Cortho, 185 pm; Cortho-Cmeta, 139 pm; Cmeta-Cpara, 140 pm;
b
Cortho-As-Cortho, 97°. Intermolecular As‚‚‚As distances are given
in Figure 1b.
atoms in 2 and their short interatomic distance consti-
tute another manifestation of secondary bonding be-
tween heavier group 15 elements. This phenomenon is
most obvious in the solid-state structures of the com-
pounds R2E-ER2 (E ) As, Sb, Bi), which exhibit short
intermolecular contacts.12 This has also been observed
for distiba- and dibismaferrocenes13a and for dibis-
moles.13b In the present case, adoption of the syn-
periplanar conformation is facilitated by the absence of
ring substituents which would render an eclipsed rota-
mer less favorable. The sandwich structure of bis-
(arsenine)titanium is slightly tilted; deviations of the
ligand planes from a parallel disposition amounting to
4.4° (Ti1), 3.9° (Ti3), and 9.0° (Ti4), respectively. The
Ti2-containing unit is not considered for reasons of
disorder. The direction of tilt brings the As-containing
corners of the rings into closer proximity. As is apparent
from Figure 1, the ligands are folded, however, along
the axis connecting the ortho carbon atoms. The tilt of
the two C5 planes is probably derived from the peculiar
shape of the C5H5As ring (the transannular ortho carbon
distance exceeds the meta carbon distance) since, in this
way, constancy of the Ti-C distances may be reached.
This is counterbalanced by ring folding which prevents
the As atoms from approaching each other too closely.
η6 coordination of arsenine to titanium effects significant
changes in ring geometry: in comparison to the free
ligand 1, in the complex 2 the angle C-As-C is
decreased by 3° and the bond lengths As-Cortho (+4 pm),
Cortho-Cmeta (+2 pm), and Cmeta-Cpara (+5 pm) are
increased (mean values for the units 1, 3, and 4). This
is the normal behavior encountered for bis(arene)metal
(5) (a) Benfield, F. W. S.; Green, M. L. H.; Ogden, J . S.; Young, D.
J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1973, 866. (b) Anthony, M. T.; Green,
M. L. H.; Young, D. J . Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1975, 1419. (c) Bandy,
J . A.; Berry, A.; Green, M. L. H.; Perutz, R. N.; Pront, K.; Verpeaux,
J .-N. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 729.
(6) (a) Alcock, N. W. Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem. 1972, 15, 1. (b)
Pyykko¨, P. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 597.
(7) Chiche, E.; Galy, J .; Thiollet, G.; Mathey, F. Acta Crystallogr.
1980, B36, 1344.
(8) Ashe, A. J ., III; Kampf, J . W.; Pilotek, S.; Rousseau, R. Orga-
nometallics 1994, 13, 4067.
(9) Elschenbroich, C.; Koch, J .; Kroker, J .; Wu¨nsch, M.; Massa, W.;
Baum, G.; Stork, G. Chem. Ber. 1988, 121, 1983.
(12) (a) Mundt, O.; Riffel, H.; Becker, G.; Simon, A. Z. Naturforsch.
1988, 43B, 952 and literature cited therein. (b) Ashe, A. J ., III. Adv.
Organomet. Chem. 1990, 30, 77.
(10) Elschenbroich, C.; Nowotny, M.; Metz, B.; Massa, W.; Graulich,
J .; Biehler, K.; Sauer, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 547.
(11) (a) Bondi, A. J . Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 441. (b) Pauling, L. The
Nature of the Chemical Bond, 3rd ed.; Cornell University Press: Ithaca,
NY, 1960.
(13) (a) Ashe, A. J ., III; Diephouse, T. R.; Kampf, J . W.; Al-Taweel,
S. M. Organometallics 1991, 10, 2068. Ashe, A. J ., III; Kampf, J . W.;
Pilotek, S.; Rousseau, R. Organometallics 1994, 13, 4067. (b) Ashe, A.
J ., III; Kampf, J . W., Puranik, D. B.; Al-Taweel, S. M. Organometallics
1992, 11, 2743.