400
S. Wada, H. Suzuki / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 399–401
diameter, in a stainless cylinder (1.2×4 cm) with a screw
cap and a 1:2-molar mixture of an aromatic aldehyde
and malononitrile was introduced. The reaction vessel
was closed and shaken using a laboratory ball-mill
apparatus at a rate of 30 Hz for 0.5 h at room
temperature. The resulting pale yellow to light brown
powder or pasty solid was extracted with ethyl acetate
by trituration. The extract was filtered on a thin bed of
a Celite and evaporated to leave the expected product.11
As can be seen from Table 1, the yields obtained were
good to excellent. Even in the presence of excess min-
eral, neither the telomerization of malononitrile nor the
polymerization of condensation products was observed.
When methyl cyanoacetate was similarly allowed to
react with aldehydes, the reaction occurred with the
stereoselective formation of (E)-cyanocinnamic esters.
However, oxidative loss of aldehydes became serious.
The addition of a small amount of hydroquinone as
antioxidant was found to solve the problem (entries
16–18).
Reagent-grade calcium carbonate and fluoride are com-
mercially available in the form of fine powder which,
however, proved to be unsatisfactory for the Kno¨ve-
nagel condensation under milling conditions. Thus, it
may be pertinent to speculate on the role of calcite and
fluorite employed. When the minerals are mechanically
crushed, the newborn solid surface should be highly
activated with the naked ionic species in situ generated.
The naked carbonate and fluoride anions act as a
strong base capable of deprotonating the active methyl-
ene compounds, with the consequent formation of a
carboanion stabilized via the coordination with calcium
cation, which combines with a carbonyl compound,
eventually leading to the Kno¨venagel product.
Aldehydes bearing an electron-withdrawing group
afforded the highest yields relative to other ones, while
aldehydes bearing an electron-donating group led to
lower yield. The reaction vessel was not airtight, so
benzaldehyde and p-tolualdehyde suffered extensive
oxidation during milling, lowering the yield of conden-
sation products (entries 5 and 7). However, the Michael
addition reaction of the initial product with a second
molecule of active methylene component to form a
1:2-addition product was not observed under the condi-
tions employed. The reaction appears to be subject to
considerable steric effect. Thus, in the case of aromatic
ketones, acetophenone was quite sluggish to react, giv-
ing the expected product only in 23% yield under the
same conditions. As expected, benzophenone failed to
react.
In summary, we have developed an attractive alterna-
tive to the classical Kno¨venagel condensation. The
reaction proceeds on the mechanically crushed mineral
surface under completely solvent-free and neutral con-
ditions. It is fast, clean and of low cost, work-up
procedure is simple, and yield is good to excellent. The
present methodology was also found to be applicable to
the aldol-type condensation between active methylene
and carbonyl compounds,13 the details of which will
appear in a forthcoming paper.
Table 1. Calcite/fluorite-mediated Kno¨venagel reaction of
aromatic aldehydes with malononitrile and methyl
cyanoacetate
References
Run Mineral reagent
R1
R2
Yield (%)a
1. (a) Tietze, L.; Beifuss, U. In Comprehensive Organic
Synthesis; Heathcock, C., Ed.; Oxford: Pergamon Press,
1991; Vol. 2, pp. 341–394; (b) Jones, G. Org. React. 1967,
15, 204–599.
2. (a) Allen, C. F. H.; Spangler, F. W. Org. Synth. Coll. Vol.
III 1955, 377–379; (b) Cragoe, E. J., Jr.; Robb, C. M.;
Spragne, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1950, 15, 381–390.
3. (a) Acker, D. S.; Hertler, W. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962,
84, 3370–3374; (b) Bastus, J. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1963,
955–958.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Iceland spar
NO2 CN
CN
Br
96
92
81
84
(CaCO3)
from Kansu, Chinab
Cl
Me
OH
H
97 (66)c
93
58 (36)c
NO2 CO2Me 100
CN
Br
Cl
H
9
100
94
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
56d
4. Rand, L.; Swisher, J. V.; Cronin, C. J. J. Org. Chem.
1962, 27, 3505–3507.
26c
100
87
NO2
CN
Br
5. (a) Prajapati, D.; Lekhok, K. C.; Sandhu, J. S.; Ghosh,
A. C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 959–960; (b)
Prajapati, D.; Sandhu, J. S. Chem. Lett. 1992, 1945–1946;
(c) Rao, P. S.; Venkataratnam, R. V. Tetrahedron Lett.
1991, 32, 5821–5822.
6. (a) Reddy, T. I.; Varma, R. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
1721–1724; (b) Abdallah-El Ayoubi, S.; Texier-Boullet, F.
J. Chem. Res. (S) 1995, 205–206; (c) Angeletti, E.;
Canepa, C.; Martinetti, G.; Venturello, P. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1989, 105–107.
7. (a) Simpson, J.; Rathbone, D. L.; Billington, D. C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7031–7033; (b) Saito, T.;
Goto, H.; Honda, K.; Fujii, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992,
33, 7535–7538; (c) Hein, R. W.; Astle, M. J.; Shelton, J.
R. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 4874–4878.
CN
99
Fluorspar
Cl
Me
H
99 (30)c
(CaF2)
93 (38)c
100 (30)c
82
from Hunan, Chinab
NO2 CO2Me
CN
Br
51d
82d
a Yield is based on aldehyde and refers to isolated compound. No
effort was made to optimize the milling conditions.
b Purchased from Nichika Corporation, Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto 604-
0943, Japan.
c A catalytic amount of hydroquinone was added. Numeral in paren-
thesis refers to the yield obtained in the absence of antioxidant.
d Determined by 1H NMR.