In the present paper, we demonstrate the utility of 4 as a
three-carbon annulating agent by taking advantage of the
ability of the activated alkene linkage of 5 to undergo
intramolecular additions of organolithiums or phenols. Since
divalent sulfur stabilizes both negative and positive charges
on the carbon atom to which it is attached, the alkene
linkages in compounds such as 5 are quite versatile.
It has been demonstrated that vinyl sulfides undergo
reductive lithiation by aromatic radical anions far more
slowly than do saturated phenyl thioethers even though the
product vinyllithiums are far more stable than alkyllithiums,
thus making selective reductive lithiation possible in mol-
ecules with both types of phenylthio groups; this has allowed
convenient cyclizations to cyclopropanes and cyclobutanes.6
This concept is herein extended to cyclopentanes.
hydroxyl group and the CH2SPh group of 10 was established
by crystallography (Figure 1).10
Figure 1. X-ray crystal structure of 10.
We have found that R-1-(phenylthio)allylation of cyclohex-
anone by 4 gives much better yields of 7 when the correspond-
ing enol silyl ether 6 is treated with 4 in the presence of a Lewis
acid than when the lithium enolate of cyclohexanone is treated4b
directly with 4. Smooth addition7 of (phenylthio)methyllithium8
to 7 gave the tertiary alcohols 8a and 8b. Deprotonation of this
mixture with butyllithium followed by reductive lithiation with
lithium 4,4′-di-tert-butylbiphenylide (LDBB) generated the
alkyllithium group that added to the activated alkene as shown
to provide a sulfur-stabilized organolithium capable of sulfe-
nylation to the thioacetal 9 or protonation to the alkyl sulfide
10. The terminal phenylthio substituent on the alkene linkage
of 8a and 8b is not essential for cyclization by carbolithiation9
but it allows greatly enhanced versatility as in the production
of 9 (Scheme 1).
It was anticipated that a similar sequence starting from
the trimethylsilyl enol ether 11 of cyclopentanone would be
challenging because of the notorious strain of trans-fused
diquinanes.9c As shown in Scheme 2, R-allylated cyclopen-
Scheme 2. Preparation and Cyclization of the R-Allylated
Cyclopentanone Adduct of (Phenylthio)methyllithium
Scheme 1. Preparation and Cyclization of the R-Allylated
Cyclohexanone Adduct of (Phenylthio)methyllithium
tanone 12 and its adduct 13 with (phenylthio)methyllithium
were readily obtained. However, after reductive lithiation,
no cyclization was observed at -78 °C. Gratifyingly, at -20°
cyclization occurred to the diquinane 14, albeit in lower yield
than in the formation of 10 in which the generated 5-mem-
bered ring is fused to a 6-membered ring. The trans
stereochemistry of 13 and therefore of 14 is assumed on the
basis of the high probability that the organolithium attacks
the cyclopentanone 12 from the least hindered side as occurs
in the case of the addition of the same organolithium to the
closely analogous cyclohexanone 7 in Scheme 1.
A similar sequence starting with the cycloheptanone silyl
ether should be particularly useful if successful since it would
(9) Terminal alkenes readily undergo cyclization by intramolecular
carbolthiation to generated cyclopenylmethyllithiums. Reviews: (a) Mealy,
M. J.; Bailey, W. F. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 646, 59–67. (b) Hogan,
A. M. L.; O’Shea, D. F. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3839–3851, Recent papers:
(c) Deng, K.; Bensari-Bouguerra, A.; Whetstone, J.; Cohen, T. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 2360–2372, and citations therein. (d) Sanz, R.; Ignacio, J. M.;
Rodriguez, M. A.; Fananas, F. J.; Barluenga, J. Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13,
4998–5008. (e) Groth, U.; Kottgen, P.; Langenbach, P.; Lindenmaier, A.;
Schutz, T.; Wiegand, M. Synlett 2008, 1301–1304. (f) Bahde, R. J.;
Rychnovsky, S. D. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4017–4020. (g) Tsuchida, S.;
Kaneshige, A.; Ogata, T.; Baba, H.; Yamamoto, Y.; Tomioka, K. Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 3635–3638.
The stereochemistry of 9 was supported by 1H NMR, 13
NMR, and an NOE effect. The cis relationship between the
C
(4) (a) Cohen, T.; Bennett, D. A.; Mura, A. J., Jr. J. Org. Chem. 1976,
41, 2506–2507. (b) Ritter, R. H.; Cohen, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
3718–3725. (c) Fitt, J. J.; Gschwend, H. W. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 303–
305.
(5) Mura, A. J., Jr.; Majetich, G.; Grieco, P. A.; Cohen, T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1975, 4437–4440.
(6) Chen, F.; Mudryk, B.; Cohen, T. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 3291–3304.
(7) Hannaby, M.; Warren, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1989, 303–
311.
(10) Crystallographic data of 10 (CCDC 278769) can be obtained free
of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, 12 Union Road,
Cambridge CB 1EZ, UK; email: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk.
(8) Corey, E. J.; Seebach, D. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 4097–4099.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 20, 2009
4577