C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Reaction Results of N-Methyl-N-phenylhydrazine with
not give the ortho-aminated product 2-amino-1-naphthol, 8-hy-
droxyquinoline produced 7-amino-8-hydroxyquinoline in about
30% yield (Table 2, entry 9). 2-Naphthalenamine could also be
ortho aminated by this method giving naphthalene-1,2-diamine
in 40% yield (Table 2, entry 10). In the case of 1-naphthale-
namine, only 10% of the ortho-aminated product was attained
(Table 2, entry 11). Monocyclic phenols and arylamines, such
as phenol, 4-methylphenol, 4-methoxyphenol, 4-nitrophenol,
aniline, and N-methylaniline did not undergo this reaction.
In summary, an unexpected reaction of N,N-disubstituted
hydrazine with naphthol and its analogues under simply thermal
conditions has been disclosed. This finding provides a new
general approach to the cleavage of N-N bond of N,N-
disubstituted hydrazines, which can be used for the synthesis
of secondary amines. The direct ortho amination of naphthol
and its analogues, which is advantageous over traditional
synthesis, may find its wide application in preparation of many
valuable organic compounds. Further work will focus on the
reaction mechanism, the reactions of structurally more complex
hydroxyl- and amino-substituted arenes, as well as the utilization
of this reaction in the syntheses of complex molecules.
Analogues of 2-Naphthola
Acknowledgment. We thank the National Natural Science
Foundation of China for financial support. We are also grateful
to the Analytical & Testing Center of Sichuan University for
supports in NMR and MS analyses.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures
and spectroscopic characterization of the products. This material
References
(1) (a) Selected examples for N-N bond cleavage in hydrazines: Hinman, R. L.
J. Org. Chem. 1957, 22, 148–150. (b) Feuer, H.; Brown, F., Jr. J. Org. Chem.
1970, 35, 1468–1471. (c) Denmark, S. E.; Nicaise, O.; Edwards, J. P. J.
Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 6219–6223. (d) Alonso, F.; Radivoy, G.; Yus, M.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 8673–8678. (e) Fernandez, R.; Ferrete, A.; Lassaletta,
J. M.; Llera, J. M.; Monge, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2893–
2897. (f) Friestad, G. K.; Ding, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4491–
4493. (g) Enders, D.; Funabiki, K. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1575–1577. (h) Ding,
H.; Frestad, G. K. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 637–640. (i) Sapountzis, I.; Knochel,
P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 897–900. (j) Sinha, P.; Kofink, C. C.;
Knochel, P. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3741–3744.
a Reaction conditions: 1:1 substrate molar ratio, argon atmosphere.
b Isolated yields. c Reaction was carried out in chlorobenzene.
The reaction could also be carried out in solvent. For example,
N-methyl-N-phenylhydrazine, N-cyclohexyl-N-phenylhydrazine,
N,N-dimethylhydrazine reacted with 2-naphthol in methanol at
20 °C under argon in a longer reaction time (15, 15, and 60 h,
respectively) to afford products in lower yields (Table 1, entries
1, 2, and 8).
(2) (a) Salvatore, R. N.; Yoon, C. H.; Jung, K. W. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 7785–
7811. (b) Kienle, M.; Dubbaka, S. R.; Brade, K.; Knochel, P. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2007, 4166–4176.
(3) Fabian, J.; Nakazumi, H.; Matsuoka, M. Chem. Rew. 1992, 92, 1197–1226.
(4) (a) Israel, M.; Zoll, E. C. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 3566–3567. (b) Musser,
J. H.; Jones, H.; Sciortino, S.; Bailey, K.; Coutts, S. M.; Khandwala, A.;
Sonnino, G. P.; Leibowitz, M.; Wolf, P.; Neiss, E. S. J. Med. Chem. 1985,
28, 1255–1259. (c) Sleath, P. R.; Noar, J. B.; Eberlein, G. A.; Bruice, T. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3328–3338. (d) Maryanoff, B. E.; Nortey,
S. O.; McNally, J. J.; Sanfilippo, P. J.; McComsey, D. F.; Dubinsky, B.;
Shank, R. P.; Reitz, A. B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 1547–1552.
(5) Giorgini, E.; Petrucci, R.; Astolfi, P.; Mason, R.-P.; Greci, L. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 4011–4017.
To further evaluate the scope of this reaction, a variety of
analogues of naphthol were employed. Like 2-naphthol, 6-bromo-
2-naphthol, 6-tert-butyl-2-naphthol, 2,7-naphthalenediol, 7-meth-
oxy-2-naphthol, 7-allyloxy-2-naphthol, and ethyl 6-hydroxy-2-
naphthoate reacted readily with N-methyl-N-phenylhydrazine
and exhibited high yields (Table 2, entries 1-6). It is noted
that only one amino group was introduced onto 2,7-naphtha-
lenediol. This may be attributed to the steric hindrance rising
from the amino group that is already situated at C-1. The same
reason may explain why 8-acetamino-2-naphthol did not react
with N-methyl-N-phenylhydrazine under similar conditions. The
reactions of 2,7-naphthalenediol, 6-hydroxyquinoline, and 7-hy-
droxyquinoline were performed in chlorobenzene because of
their high melting points. The reactions of 6-, 7-, and 8-hy-
droxyquinoline with N-methyl-N-phenylhydrazine gave the
corresponding aminated hydroxyquinolines in moderate yields
(Table 2, entries 7-9). Interestingly, although 1-naphthol did
(6) Bin, D. L.; Lindley, J. M.; Meth, C. O. Synthesis 1978, 23–24.
(7) Barton, D. H. R.; Greneur, S. L.; Motherwell, W. B. Tetrahedron. Lett. 1983,
24, 1601–1604.
(8) (a) Japp, F. R.; Maitland, W. J. Chem. Soc. 1903, 83, 267–276. (b) Fuchs,
W.; Niszel, F. Chem. Ber. 1927, 60, 2058–2062. (c) Darke, N. L. Organic
Reactions; Wiley: New York, 1942, 1, 105-128. (d) Seeboth, H.; Ba¨rwolff,
D.; Becker, B. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1965, 683, 85–92. (e) Seeboth, H.;
Neumann, H.; Gr¨sch, H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1965, 683, 93–99. (f) Seeboth,
H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1967, 6, 307–317. (g) Miyano, S.; Nawa,
M.; Mori, A.; Harukichi, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1984, 57, 2171–2176.
(h) Brown, K. J.; Berry, M. S.; Murdoch, J. R. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
4345–4349. (i) Yamamoto, Y.; Sakamoto, A.; Nishioka, T.; Oda, J.;
ˇ
Fukazawa, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 1112–1119. (j) Vyskocˇil, S.; Smrcˇina,
M.; Lorenc, M.; Tisˇlerova´, I.; Brooks, R. D.; Kulagowski, J. J.; Langer, V.;
Farrugia, L. J.; Kocˇovsky´, P. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1359–1365.
(9) Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) tests show the reactions are slightly
exothermic. See Supporting Information.
JA711153B
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 18, 2008 5841