Danishefsky’s electron-rich diene improved their reactivity
and selectivity, as well as their acid and heat sensitivity.11
On the other hand, 1,2-diaza-1,3-butadienes12 are highly
versatile reagents that proved to be useful intermediates in
the syntheses of several five- and six-membered azahetero-
cycles.13 The high reactivity of these compounds, related to
the electrophilicity of the terminal carbon atom (C-4) of the
heterodiene system, has been shown to allow the 1,4-addition
(Michael-type) of a variety of carbon and heteronucleo-
philes.14,15 In such a framework, some of our recent efforts
have been addressed in the development of new reactions
able to give carbon-carbon bond formation via the Mu-
kaiyama version of the Michael reaction of silyl enol ethers.16
Thus, we have reported a facile approach to pyrrole and
indole ring skeletons, by Lewis acid (ZnCl2)-catalyzed
Mukaiyama-Michael addition/heterocyclization of enolsilyl
derivatives on 1,2-diaza-1,3-butadienes,15 in which the Lewis
acid catalysis represents an alternative to the alkali enolate
method.
With the aim of extending this approach to reactions of
other (silyloxy)alkene nucleophiles, we investigated the
addition of 1-methoxy-3-trimethylsilyloxy-1,3-butadiene (Dan-
ishefsky’s diene, 2a), 1-methoxy-2-methyl-3-trimethylsilyl-
oxy-1,3-pentadiene (2b), and 1-dimethylamino-3-tert-bu-
tyldimethylsilyloxy-1,3-butadiene (Rawal’s diene, 2c) on
some 1,2-diaza-1,3-butadienes (1a-i).
First, we examined the 1,4-addition of 2a on 1,2-diaza-
1,3-butadienes 1a,f in the presence of a catalytic amount of
ZnCl2 in CH2Cl2 at room temperature.15a After the disap-
pearance of the starting 1,2-diaza-1,3-butadienes, the check-
ing of the crude mixtures by TLC revealed the presence of
two products as major components, easily separated by flash
chromatography and identified as the silylated (3a,b) and
the desilylated (4a,e) hydrazonic 1,4-adducts, respectively.
However, the above crude reaction mixtures by treatment
with tetrabutylamonium fluoride (TBAF) directly gave 4a,e
(Scheme 1). All attempts to isolate Diels-Alder products
failed suggesting that this reaction involves a Mukaiyama-
Michael reaction and not a Diels-Alder-type process.17,18
(2) (a) For recent reviews, see Henry, G. D. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 6043–
6061. (b) Michael, J. P. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005, 22, 627–646. (c) Abass, M.
Heterocycles 2005, 65, 901–965.
(3) (a) Jones, G. In ComprehensiVe Heterocyclic Chemistry II; Katritzky,
A. R., Rees, C. W., Scriven, E. F. V., McKillop, A., Eds; Pergamon:
Oxford, 1996; Vol. 5; pp 167-243. (b) Larock, R. C. ComprehensiVe
Organic Transformations: A Guide to Functional Group Preparations;
Wiley-VCH: New York, 1999.
(4) Danishefsky, S.; Kitahara, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7807–
7808.
(5) (a) Danishefsky, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 400–406. (b)
Danishefsky, S. J.; DeNinno, M. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26,
15–23. (c) Danishefsky, S. Org. Chem. 1989, 2, 273–297. (d) Herczzegh,
P.; Kovacs, I.; Erdosi, G.; Varga, T.; Agocs, A.; Szilagyi, L.; Sztaricskai,
F.; Berecibar, A.; Lukacs, G.; Olesker, A. Pure Appl. Chem. 1997, 69, 519–
524.
Scheme 1. ZnCl2-Catalyzed Mukaiyama-Michael-Type
Addition of Danishefsky’s Diene 2a on 1,2-Diaza-1,3-butadienes
1a,f
(6) (a) Kerwin, J. F., Jr.; Danishefsky, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23,
3739–3742. (b) Yao, S.; Johannsen, M.; Hazell, R. G.; Jørgensen, K. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3121–3124. (c) Josephsohn, N. S.;
Snapper, M. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4018–4019.
(d) Loncaric, C.; Manabe, K.; Kobayashi, S. Chem. Commun. 2003, 574–
575. (e) Manchen˜o, O. G.; Arraya´s, R. G.; Carretero, J. C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 456–457. (f) Newman, C. A.; Antilla, J. C.; Chen, P.;
Predeus, A. V.; Fielding, L.; Wulff, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7216–
7217.
(7) (a) Bednarski, M.; Maring, C.; Danishefsky, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1983, 24, 3451–3454. (b) Danishefsky, S.; Larson, E.; Askin, D.; Kato, N.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 1246–1255. (c) Danishefsky, S. J. Chemtracts
1989, 2, 273–297. (d) Corey, E. J.; Cywin, C. L.; Ropez, T. D. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992, 33, 6907–6910. (e) Keck, G. E.; Li, X. Y.; Krishnamaturty, D.
J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5998–5999. (f) Mujica, M. T.; Afonso, M. M.;
Galindo, A.; Palenzuela, J. A. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 2167–2176. (g) Schaus,
S. E.; Brånalt, J.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 403–405. (h)
Simonsen, K. B.; Svenstrup, N.; Roberson, M.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem.
Eur. J. 2000, 6, 123–128. (i) Motoyama, Y.; Koga, Y.; Nishiyama, H.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 853–860. (j) Yamashita, Y.; Saito, S.; Ishitani, H.;
Kobayashi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3793–3798.
(8) (a) Danishefsky, S.; Kitahara, C. F.; Yan, C. F.; Morris, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 6996–7000. (b) Node, M.; Nishide, K.; Imazato,
H.; Kurosaki, R.; Inoue, T.; Ikariya, T. Chem. Commun. 1996, 2559–2560.
(c) Dai, M.; Sarlah, D.; Yu, M.; Danishefsky, S. J.; Jones, G. O.; Houk,
K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 645–657.
(9) Paredes, E.; Biolatto, B.; Kneeteman, M.; Mancini, P. M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 8079–8082.
(10) (a) Jørgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3558–3588.
(b) Inokuchi, T.; Okano, M.; Miyamoto, T. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8059–
8063. (c) Kuethe, J. T.; Davies, I. W.; Dormer, P. G.; Reamer, R. A.; Mathre,
D. J.; Reider, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 29–32. (d) Wang, B.; Feng,
X.; Huang, Y.; Liu, H.; Cui, X.; Jiang, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2175–
2182. (e) Long, J.; Hu, J.; Shen, X.; Ji, B.; Ding, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 10–11. (f) Zhang, X.; Du, H.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Y.-D.; Ding, K.
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 2862–2869. (g) Yu, Z.; Liu, X.; Dong, Z.; Xie,
M.; Feng, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1308–1311.
(11) (a) Danishefsky, S.; Yan, C.-F.; Singh, R. K.; Gammill, R. B.;
McCurry, P. M., Jr.; Fritsch, N.; Clardy, J J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101,
7001–7008. (b) Kozmin, S. A.; Rawal, V. H. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 5252–
5253. (c) Kozmin, S. A.; Green, M. T.; Rawal, V. H J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 8045–8047. (d) Kozmin, S. A.; Janey, J. M.; Rawal, V. H. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 3039–3052. (e) Amil, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Terasawa, H.; Uneyama,
K. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3103–3105.
Encouraged by these preliminary results, we enlarged the
scope of the previous reaction to a series of 1,2-diaza-1,3-
butadienes 1a-i first testing the reactivity with the Dan-
ishefsky’s diene 2a. Thus, the Mukaiyama-Michael deriva-
tives 4a-h were obtained in good to excellent yields
(Scheme 2).
Interestingly, the 1,4-adducts 4a-d, bearing the ester
group (R1 ) OR) in the R-position to the CdN moiety, with
TFA in THF furnished the relevant 4H-1-aminopyrroles
5a-d in excellent yields via intramolecular ring closure
(Scheme 2).15 It is noteworthy that the more reactive tosyl
1984
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 10, 2008