notoriously prone to racemize under basic conditions, suitable
selection of the chiral catalyst and reaction conditions was
important. Optimization studies with (R)-LLB 1 for the
reaction of (S)-3a11 and nitroalkanes 4 are summarized in
Table 1. Among the nitroalkanes investigated (entries 1-3),
nitroacetaldehyde dimethyl acetal (4a)12 gave promising
results. With nitroalkane 4a at -20 °C, (R)-LLB 1 gave
anti,syn-5aa as the major reaction product together with
syn,syn-adduct 6aa in 92% yield.13,14 Although the ratio of
5:6 was unsatisfactory (entry 1, 5:6 ) 1.8:1), the result was
promising as an initial trial because anti-nitroaldol products
7 and 8 were not observed in entry 1. In contrast, complex
mixtures of diastereomers were produced when using nitro-
ethanol (4b) (entry 2: 5:6:7+8 ) 0.8:1:0.8) and nitroethane
(4c) (entry 3, 5:6:7+8 ) 1:1:0.6). Because the acetal moiety
in nitroalkane 4a is potentially useful for further function-
alization of the products, we selected 4a for further optimiza-
tions. The reaction temperature was key to improving
diastereoselectivity (entries 4 and 5), and anti,syn-5aa was
obtained in 96% yield with >20:1 diastereoselectivity at -50
°C. The optical purity of 5aa was confirmed to be >99% ee
by chiral stationary phase HPLC analysis. These results
suggested that racemization of the aldehyde, retro-reaction,
and epimerization of the product were effectively suppressed
under the optimized reaction conditions. It is also noteworthy
that the reaction proceeded smoothly with as little as 1.1
equiv of 4a, affording anti,syn-5aa in 97% yield with >20:1
diastereoselectivity (entry 6).
Table 2. Nitroaldol Reaction of Various R-Chiral Aldehydes
3a-3i with Nitroalkane 4a Using (R)-LLB 1 for anti,syn-5
b
a Isolated yield. Determined by H NMR. c (S)-LLB (1) was used.
1
Scheme 2. Unsuccessful Nitroaldol Reaction of (S)-3a with
Nitroalkane 4a by Using Mismatched (S)-LLB 1
The optimized reaction conditions were applied to several
R-chiral aldehydes (Table 2). (R)-LLB 1 promoted the
reaction of (S)-R-amino aldehydes with 1.1 equiv of nitroal-
(7) (a) Hanessian, S.; Kloss, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 1261. (b)
Hanessian, S.; Devasthale, P. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 987. (c)
Wehner, V.; Ja¨ger, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1990, 29, 1169. (d) Ferna´ndez,
R.; Gasch, C.; Go´mez-Sa´nchez, A.; V´ılchez, J. E.; Castro, A. L.; Dia´nez,
M. J.; Estrada, M. D.; Pe´rez-Garrido, S. Carbohydr. Res. 1993, 247, 239.
(e) Soengas, R. G.; Este´vez, J. C.; Este´vez, R. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2003, 14, 3955. (f) Bernardi, L.; Bonini, B. F.; Dessole, G.; Fochi, M.;
Comes-Franchini, M.; Gavioli, S.; Ricci, A.; Varchi, G. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 1418.
(8) Hanessian et al. reported an exceptional example using (R)-LLB 1
as a chiral catalyst. Although there remained a room for improvement in
diastereoselectivity (anti-syn-5:syn-syn-6:others ) 20:5.5:2.5), anti-syn-5
was obtained as a major product. See Hanessian, S.; Brassard, M.
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 7621.
kane 4a, giving anti,syn-nitroaldols 5 with >20:1 (5:other
isomers) diastereoselectivity. Ester and acetal functional
groups in aldehydes were compatible under the present
reaction conditions, affording products in 98-86% yield and
>20:1 diastereoselectivity (entries 4-6). The present system
was also applicable to R-oxy aldehydes (entries 8 and 9).
O-Benzyl-protected-aldehyde 3h was less reactive than
R-amino aldehydes, and the reaction was performed at -20
°C to give 5ha in 80% yield with 14:1 diastereoselectivity
(entry 8). With aldehyde (R)-3i, (S)-LLB 1 was suitable, and
ent-5ia was obtained in >20:1 (ent-5:other isomers) diaste-
reoselectivity (entry 9).
Preliminary trials to synthesize syn,syn-product 6aa from
(S)-3a using (S)-LLB failed, in which the stereochemical
course of the reaction should be controlled by (S)-LLB to
override the mismatched steric bias of R-chiral (S)-3a
(Scheme 2). Nitroaldol adducts were obtained in 24% yield
with poor diastereoselectivity (5aa:6aa:others ) 2.8:1:2.6).
Thus, we screened other chiral catalysts for switching the
diastereoselectivity, and a Pd:La:(S,S)-Schiff base:OAr ) 1:1:
(9) (a) Reviews on Lewis acid-Brønsted base bifunctional catalysis
Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2008, 81, 60. (b)
Shibasaki, M.; Matsunaga, S. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2006, 35, 269. (c) Shibasaki,
M.; Yoshikawa, N. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 2187.
(10) (a) Handa, S.; Nagawa, K.; Sohtome, Y.; Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3230. For related bimetallic Schiff
base catalysts, see: (b) Handa, S.; Gnanadesikan, V.; Matsunaga, S.;
Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4900. (c) Chen, Z.; Morimoto,
H.; Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2170.
(11) For the synthesis of aldehyde 3 without racemization: Tokuyama,
H.; Yokoshima, S.; Lin, S.-C.; Li, L.; Fukuyama, T. Synthesis 2002, 1121,
and references therein.
(12) Synthesis of nitroalkane 4a: Ja¨ger, V.; Poggendorf, P. Org. Synth.
1997, 74, 130. For the use of nitroacetaldehyde diethyl acetal for anti-anti-
selective nitroaldol reaction, see ref 7c.
(13) The stereochemistry of 5aa was determined by O-methyl mandelate
method: (a) Trost, B. M.; Bunt, R. C.; Pulley, S. R. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 4202. (b) Trost, B. M.; Belletire, J. L.; Godleski, S.; McDougal, P. G.;
Balkovec, J. M.; Baldwin, J. J.; Christy, M. E.; Ponticello, G. S.; Varga,
S. L.; Springer, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2370. See the Supporting
Information
.
(14) The stereochemistry of 6aa was unequivocally determined by X-ray
crystallographic analysis. See the Supporting Information
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 11, 2008
2233