H+ for 50 mg H-SAP (A)), methyl oxostearate (mixture of 9- and
10-isomers) is the product obtained preferentially.
Table 3 Transformation of methyl 9,10-epoxystearate using different
catalysts in the absence of methanola
The layered material prepared under mild acid conditions
(H-SAP (A)) displays Brønsted acid sites which are strong and
accessible at the same time, whereas these two features are
not present together in the other solid catalysts employed in
this work (Table 2). As derived by FT-IR spectroscopy of CO
adsorbed at 100 K, H-BEA zeolite shows Brønsted acid sites
whose acidity is lower than that of H-SAP(A), the downward
shift of the OH stretching vibration upon CO interaction
(DnOH) being around 300 and 340 cm-1, respectively.25,19 The acid
strength of Brønsted acid sites of H-SAP (A) is similar to that
observed in most acid zeolites (see for instance H-Mordenite26).
NH3 adsorption indicates that H-BEA zeolite contains a
larger number of Brønsted acid sites with respect to H-SAP(A)
material (Table 2, entry 6). However, the microporous nature
of zeolitic materials limits the accessibility of the epoxystearate
molecules to the catalytic sites. This justifies the lower catalytic
activity of H-BEA with respect to H-SAP (A). On the other
hand, the mesoporous Al-SBA-15 is characterized by large pores
(around 8 nm) and is able to easily accommodate epoxystearate
molecules. Nevertheless, even though Al-SBA-15 contains an
amount of Brønsted acid sites that is almost twice as high than
those of H-SAP (A) (Table 2, entry 7), the weak nature of its
surface acid sites27 (the downward shift of the OH stretching
vibration upon CO interaction at 100 K (DnOH) being around
150–200 cm-1), in comparison to H-SAP (A) and protonic
zeolites, limits its catalytic activity.
Entry
Catalyst
Cb (%)
Sc (%) 5 and 6
10
11
12
13
H-SAP(A)
SiO2–Al2O3
66
12
50
<2
87
50
70
—
d
H2SO4
no catalyst
a Catalyst (50 mg) pre-treated at 150 ◦C for 1 h in air; Me-epoxystearate
(500 mL); no alcohol; toluene (3 mL), 85 ◦C. b Conversion after 1 h.
c Selectivity to 10-oxostearate and 9-oxostearate (5 and 6) at 1 h. d 6 mL
H2SO4 98%.
of epoxide is slower, but, also in this case, H-SAP (A) is the best
catalyst, with a 9,10-epoxystearate conversion of 66% (entry 10).
Conclusions
Synthetic saponite clays proved to be interesting heterogeneous
acid catalysts and a possible alternative to strong mineral acids
in the ring-opening of methyl 9,10-epoxystearate. In particular,
in the presence of methanol, 90% of methyl epoxystearate
conversion is obtained in only 5 minutes and good selectivities
to vicinal hydroxyethers are obtained from epoxidised FAMEs.
A combination of spectroscopic and catalytic results show that
the conversion is strictly related to both the concentration and
strength of accessible Brønsted acid sites on saponite materials.
The catalytic sites of protonic saponites have an acid strength
comparable to that of the most acidic zeolites, together with
a high accessibility, similar to that of mesoporous materials.
Such features pave the way to the use of these strongly acid
materials in other acid-catalysed transformations of bulky and
richly functionalised molecules, such as those used in fine and
specialty chemistry.
The role of Brønsted acid site of saponites during the ring-
opening reaction is evident in Fig. 4, where a clear dependence
of the conversion (both after 5 and 60 min) on the concentration
of protonic sites is reported. Analogously, a diminution of the
amount of acid sites in the reaction mixture, by using, for
instance, a lower amount of catalyst, implies a proportional
diminution in the epoxide conversion.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge financial support from MIUR (PRIN
Project “Progettazione e sintesi di Silsesquiossani Poliedrici
Multifunzionali per Compositi Polimerici Innovativi Termica-
mente Stabili”) and from IDECAT European NoE.
Notes and references
1 J. C. Warner, A. S. Cannon and K. M. Dye, Env. Impact Assess. Rev.,
2004, 24, 775; D. R. Dodds and R. A. Gross, Science, 2007, 318,
1250.
2 U. Biermann, W. Friedt, S. Lang, W. Lu¨hs, G. Machmu¨ller, J. O.
Metzger, M. Ru¨sch, gen. Klaas, H. J. Scha¨fer and M. P. Schneider,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 2206; G. W. Huber and A. Corma,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 7184; R. Luque, L. Herrero-Davila,
J. M. Campelo, J. H. Clark, J. M. Hidalgo, D. Luna, J. M. Marinasa
and A. A. Romero, Energy Environ. Sci., 2008, 1, 542; A. Behr, A.
Westfeschtel and J. Perez-Gomez, Chem. Eng. Technol., 2008, 31, 700.
3 X. Pages-Xatart-Pares, C. Bonnet, and O. Morin, Synthesis of new
derivatives from vegetable oil methyl esters via epoxidation and
oxirane opening in Recent Developments in the Synthesis of Fatty
Acids Derivatives, ed. G. Knothe and J. T. P. Derksen, AOCS Press,
Champaign, IL, USA, p. 141.
Fig. 4 Dependence of activity on concentration of H+ acid sites.
Conversion after 5 min (᭜) and 60 min (ꢀ). Reaction conditions as
in Table 1; entry 1, 2 and 3.
Acid-catalysed rearrangement of epoxystearate in the absence
of methanol gives a mixture of methyl 10- and 9-oxostearate
(5 and 6) as the main product. This reaction was performed
with H-SAP (A) (Table 3, entry 10), SiO2–Al2O3 (entry 11) and
H2SO4 (entry 12). In the absence of alcohol, the rearrangement
4 K. M. Doll and S. Z. Erhan, Green Chem., 2008, 10, 712.
5 B. K. Sharma, K. M. Doll and S. Z. Erhana, Green Chem., 2007, 9,
469.
6 J. Filley, Bioresour. Technol., 2005, 96, 551.
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Green Chem., 2009, 11, 1173–1178 | 1177
©