SHORT PAPER
(Z)-Urocanic Acids
1677
13C NMR (DMSO-d6): d = 167.24 (q), 144.95 (q), 133.90 (q),
129.98, 122.21, 118.31, 13.27.
R2
R2
H2O–THF
reflux
MS: m/z (%) = 152 (M+, 90), 135 (81), 134 (77), 108 (61), 107 (97),
106 (100), 105 (62), 79 (67).
N
N
N
CO2H
NH
R1
O
R1
HRMS: m/z calcd for C7H8N2O2 (M+): 152.0586; found: 152.0587.
4a R1 = Me, R2 = H
4b R1 = Me, R2 = Ph
4c R1 = R2 = H
(Z)-5a R1 = Me, R2 = H
(Z)-5b R1 = Me, R2 = Ph
(Z)-1 R1 = R2 = H
(Z)-3-(2-Methyl-3H-imidazol-4-yl)-3-phenylacrylic Acid [(Z)-
5b]
FVP of methyl 3-(2-methylimidazol-1-yl)-3-phenylacrylate (3b;
105 mg) (conditions: Tf 875 °C, Ti 160 °C, P 0.010–0.060 Torr, t 15
min) gave solid yellow 3-methyl-7-phenylpyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-
5-one (4b).12 The entire crude pyrolysate was dissolved in a mixture
of THF (2 mL) and H2O (10 mL), then transferred to a round-bot-
tomed flask and heated under reflux for 6 h during which time de-
colorization occurred. THF and H2O were removed using a rotary
evaporator and the product was dried under vacuum (oil pump) for
4 h to afford (Z)-5b; yield: 71 mg (72% for the two steps); mp >170
°C (dec. with gas evolution).
Scheme 3
– CO
N
N
N
N
CH
N
N
O
O
6
HN
N
1H NMR (DMSO-d6): d = 7.70–7.62 (5 H, br m), 7.14 (1 H, s), 5.85
(1 H, s), 2.68 (3 H, s).
7
13C NMR (DMSO-d6): d = 167.48 (q), 145.66 (q), 143.51 (q),
141.34 (q), 136.05 (q), 129.57, 129.33 (2 CH), 129.15 (2 CH),
122.57, 121.26, 13.88.
Scheme 4
confirmed the presence of the ethynyl group
(1JC,H = 251.9 Hz). This compound has been reported ex-
perimentally only in the patent literature. The mechanism
of its formation probably involves decarbonylation of the
ring-opened ketene 6 and rearrangement of the resulting
carbene (Scheme 4). Further elution of the column afford-
ed (Z)-urocanic acid [(Z)-1] (46%).
MS: m/z (%) = 228 (M+, 42), 210 (27), 183 (70), 182 (100), 181
(72), 169 (57), 168 (60), 128 (63), 115 (63), 114 (61).
HRMS: m/z calcd for C13H12N2O2 (M+): 228.0898; found:
228.0895.
(Z)-3-(3H-Imidazol-4-yl)acrylic Acid [cis-Urocanic Acid, (Z)-1]
Due to the instability of pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-one (4c) in air,
which led to the formation of insoluble material, a preparative
pyrolysis10 of methyl (E)-3-(3H-imidazol-4-yl)acrylate15 [methyl
(E)-urocanate] [(E)-2; 312 mg, 20 mmol] (conditions: Tf 850 °C, Ti
220 °C, P 0.010–0.060 Torr, t 20 min) was performed using a cold-
finger trap (cooled by a mixture of dry-ice and acetone) to collect
the product (cf. ref. 10). The connection between the furnace tube
and the cold-finger was wrapped in aluminum foil, allowing the
product to condense almost exclusively on the cold surface of the
trap. The solid yellow pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-one (4c) obtained,
was frozen into a mixture of THF (2 mL) and H2O (10 mL) to min-
imize degradation of 4c. The cold finger was allowed to warm to r.t.
under N2, then the yellow solution of 4c in THF–H2O was trans-
ferred to a round-bottomed flask and heated under reflux for 45 min
during which time the color faded. The solvent was removed using
a rotary evaporator then dried at the oil pump for 3 h to afford (Z)-
1 as an off-white solid; yield: 220 mg (78%); mp 169–171 °C (Lit.16
mp 171–173 °C).
In conclusion, we have described optimized conditions for
the stereospecific synthesis of Z-urocanic acid [(Z)-1] and
its analogues, substituted in either the imidazole ring, or in
the ring and in the alkene side-chain. The route involves
the formation and controlled hydrolysis of ‘dehydrouro-
canic acids’, the pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-ones 4.
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 250 (or 200) MHz and 63
(or 50) MHz, respectively. Chemical shifts are given in ppm relative
to TMS. Mass spectra were recorded under electron impact condi-
tions.
Flash Vacuum pyrolysis (FVP) reactions were carried out by distil-
lation of the substrate in vacuo through an electrically heated silica
furnace tube (35 × 2.5 cm). Unless stated otherwise, products were
trapped in a U-tube situated at the exit point of the furnace and
cooled with liquid N2. Pyrolysis conditions are quoted as follows:
substrate, quantity, furnace temperature (Tf), inlet temperature (Ti),
pressure range (P), pyrolysis time (t), and products.
1H NMR (DMSO-d6): d = 8.16 (1 H, s), 7.67 (1 H, d, J = 0.9 Hz),
6.88 (1 H, d, 3J = 12.9 Hz), 5.68 (1 H, d, 3J = 12.9 Hz).
13C NMR (DMSO-d6): d = 167.26 (q), 136.02, 133.91 (q), 129.90,
123.32, 118.66.
(Z)-3-(2-Methyl-3H-imidazol-4-yl)acrylic Acid [(Z)-5a]
FVP of methyl 3-(2-methylimidazol-1-yl)acrylate (3a; 105 mg)
(conditions: Tf 875 °C, Ti 120 °C, P 0.020–0.065 Torr, t 15 min)
gave a solid yellow pyrolysate of 3-methylpyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-
5-one (4a).12 The entire crude pyrolysate was dissolved in a mixture
of THF (2 mL) and H2O (10 mL), then transferred to a round-bot-
tomed flask and heated under reflux for 3 h during which time de-
colorization occurred. THF and H2O were removed using a rotary
evaporator and the product was dried under vacuum (oil pump) for
4 h to afford (Z)-5a; yield: 85 mg (89% for the two steps);7,14 mp
>190 °C (dec. with gas evolution).
4-Ethynylimidazole (7)
In an early reaction carried out under nonoptimized conditions, FVP
of methyl (E)-3-(3H-imidazol-4-yl)acrylate [(E)-2; 518 mg, 3.4
mmol] (conditions: Tf >850 °C, Ti 180–220 °C, P 0.01–0.1 Torr,
t 30 min] was carried out as above. Under N2, the trap was rinsed
with acetone (ca. 50 mL). The solution was poured into a round-bot-
tomed flask and the acetone was removed at the oil pump, keeping
the temperature of the solution below 0 °C. THF (8 mL) and H2O
(45 mL) were added and the mixture was heated at reflux for 3 h.
The solvents were removed using a rotary evaporator successively
under water pump and oil pump pressure. Dry flash chromato-
graphy on silica gel using pure EtOAc as eluent afforded 4-ethy-
1H NMR (DMSO-d6): d = 7.52 (1 H, s), 6.81 (1 H, d, 3J = 12.8 Hz),
5.62 (1 H, d, 3J = 12.8 Hz), 2.39 (3 H, s).
Synthesis 2008, No. 11, 1676–1678 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York