Yuan et al.
indicating the predominance of 6-endo cyclization (entry 10,
Table 5). The effect of Cl substitution is even more obvious in
the cases of carbamidyl radicals (entries 11-13, Table 5). An
activation energy difference of >3.0 kcal/mol is also computed
for carbamidyl radicals with other halogen atom substitution
(X ) Br, I). Compared to Cl-substitution, the vinylic OMe or
SEt substitution lowers the activation energies for 6-endo
cyclization (entries 15 and 16, Table 5). This could be attributed
to the enhanced electron density of the CdC bond with OMe
or SEt substitution. Note that the changes in activation energy
coincide well with the outcome of cyclization observed experi-
mentally (entries 6-8, Table 1). The above calculation data are
in good agreement with the experimental results. The only
exception is that, with OMe substitution, the calculated activa-
tion energy difference is only 1.4 kcal/mol while exclusive
6-endo cyclization was observed. A plausible explanation is that
thermodynamic factors might also contribute to the control of
regioselectivity in this case.15 For radical A (R ) OEt, X )
H), the 5-exo and 6-endo cyclization are exothermic by 13.2
and 16.2 kcal/mol, respectively. As a comparison, the corre-
sponding cyclizations of radical A (R ) OEt, X ) OMe) are
less exothermic (7.2 and 12.3 kcal/mol, respectively) and the
gap between 5-exo and 6-endo cyclization becomes larger, which
increase the extent of thermodynamic control on the regiose-
lectivity.
The calculations also help us to elucidate the unique role of
heteroatom substitution. While the activation energies for 6-endo
cyclization of carbamidyl radicals remain in the range of 7.0-7.7
kcal/mol, significant changes in the activation energy for 5-exo
cyclization are computed from methyl to halogen substitution
(entries 2 and 12-14, Table 5). This is unlikely to result from
the steric factors (see also structure 20). The difference between
the methyl moiety and a heteroatom is that the latter bears lone
pair electrons. Once a nitrogen-centered radical adds to a CdC
bond having an internal heteroatom substituent, it will face the
lone pair-lone pair electron repulsion between the nitrogen
radical and the heteroatom. As can be seen from the transition
state structures 19 and 20, the N-Br distance in 20 (5-exo) is
computed to be 3.069 Å, well within the range of close
interaction. On the other hand, the N-Br distance in 19 (6-
endo) is much longer (3.802 Å). Therefore, the lone pair electron
repulsion is much stronger in 5-exo cyclization than in 6-endo
cyclization. As a result, the activation energies for 5-exo
cyclization are significantly increased by the presence of the
heteroatom, leading to the overwhelming predominance of
6-endo cyclization. A similar discussion based on lone pair
electron repulsion was found to successfully explain not only
the regioselectivity of sulfonamidyl and aminyl radical cycliza-
tion, but also the chemoselectivity in the electrophilic halocy-
clization of unsaturated amides with vinylic halogen substitu-
tion,16 implying the ubiquity of lone pair electron repulsion in
the chemistry of vinyl halides toward heteroatom-centered
reactive species.
that carbamidyl radicals are the superior choice for efficient
cyclization. Moreover, the regioselectivity of cyclization can
be well controlled by vinylic heteroatom substitution. As a result,
highly regioselective 5-exo, 6-endo, 6-exo, and even 7-endo
cyclization could be implemented. This finding should be an
important application in the synthesis of cyclic amines.
Experimental Section
Typical Procedure for Bu3SnH-Initiated Amidyl Radical
Cyclization Reactions. Ethyl N-phenylthio-4-methylpent-4-enyl-
carbamate (1d, 279 mg, 1.0 mmol) was dissolved in 80 mL of
anhydrous benzene, and the solution was brought to reflux. The
mixture of Bu3SnH (0.4 mL, 1.5 mmol) and AIBN (49 mg, 0.3
mmol) in benzene (20 mL) was added over a period of 4 h with
the aid of a syringe pump under nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture
was refluxed for an additional 1 h and then cooled to room
temperature. After removal of the solvent under reduced pressure,
the residue was chromatographed on silica gel with hexane-ethyl
acetate (20:1, v:v) as the eluent to give piperidine 2d (92 mg, 54%
yield) and pyrrolidine 3d (34 mg, 20% yield). 2d: Colorless liquid.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.87-0.89 (3H, m), 1.03-1.10 (1H,
m), 1.23-1.28 (3H, m), 1.42-1.61 (3H, m), 1.77-1.80 (1H, m),
2.39 (1H, br), 2.67-2.76 (1H, m), 4.00-4.13 (4H, m). 13C NMR
(75.4 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.6, 18.7, 24.7, 30.8, 32.8, 44.1, 51.1, 60.9,
155.4. EIMS: m/z (rel intensity) 171 (M+, 15), 156 (2), 142 (100),
126 (9), 116 (18), 98 (58), 69 (13), 56 (28). Anal. Calcd for
C9H17NO2: C, 63.13; H, 10.01; N, 8.18. Found: C, 63.01; H, 9.74;
N, 8.19. 3d: Colorless liquid. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ
1.22-1.30 (3H, m), 1.40/1.34 (6H, s), 1.72-1.80 (4H, m),
3.40-3.51 (2H, m), 4.04-4.19 (2H, m). 13C NMR (75.4 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 14.4/14.3, 21.8/21.5, 25.7/26.7, 41.4/42.5, 47.3/48.2, 59.5/
60.0, 60.2/59.7, 153.7/155.0. EIMS: m/z (rel intensity) 171 (M+,
2), 156 (61), 128 (17), 112 (18), 84 (100), 70 (8), 55 (21), 47 (27).
Anal. Calcd for C9H17NO2: C, 63.13; H, 10.01; N, 8.18. Found: C,
62.82; H, 9.86; N, 8.24.
Typical Procedure for the Reactions of Amides with Pb-
(OAc)4/I2. To the solution of Pb(OAc)4 (155 mg, 0.35 mmol) in
dry dichloromethane (3 mL) was added iodine (64 mg, 0.25 mmol)
at rt under nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was stirred at rt for
5 min. N-(4-Bromopent-4-enyl)acetamide (7c, 21 mg, 0.1 mmol)
was then added. The reaction mixture was irradiated at rt for 1 h
with the aid of a 125 W high-pressure mercury lamp. The light
was then turned off and aqueous Na2S2O3 (10 mL) was added. The
two layers were separated and the aqueous phase was extracted
with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layer was washed with aqueous
Na2CO3 and brine and then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. After
removal of the solvent under reduced pressure, the crude product
was purified by column chromatography on silica gel with hexane/
ethyl acetate (20:1, v:v) as the eluent to give the product 8c as a
yellowish oil. Yield: 20 mg (60%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ
1.55-1.86 (2H, m), 2.18/2.14 (3H, s), 2.42-2.50 (1H, m),
2.64-2.73 (1H, m), 3.46-3.73 (2H, m), 3.86/4.04 (1H, 2d, J )
14.4 Hz), 4.06/4.25 (1H, 2d, J ) 14.4 Hz). 13C NMR (75.4 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 21.4, 25.3/26.1, 38.0/36.3, 40.9/45.8, 50.2/50.0, 65.4/
60.2, 169.2/169.0. EIMS: m/z (rel intensity) 332 (M+ + 1, 9), 252
(1), 206 (53), 204 (50), 164 (70), 162 (69), 83 (100), 43 (74). HRMS
calcd for C7H11OBrIN (M) 330.9069, found 330.9067.
Typical Procedure for the Reactions of Unsaturated Amides
with DIB/I2. To the solution of DIB (64 mg, 0.2 mmol) in dry
CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was added iodine (38 mg, 0.15 mmol) at rt under
nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was stirred at rt for 5 min. Ethyl
4-iodopent-4-enylcarbamide (7g, 32 mg, 0.1 mmol) was added and
the resulting mixture was irradiated at rt for 2 h with the aid of a
125 W high-pressure mercury lamp. Aqueous Na2S2O3 (5 mL) was
then added. The two layers were separated and the aqueous phase
was extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layer was washed
with aqueous Na2CO3 and brine, and then dried over anhydrous
Conclusion
The chemistry detailed above has provided a clear under-
standing on the behaviors of unsaturated amidyl radicals. The
substituents attached to the carbonyl (R in A) significantly alter
the reactivity of amidyl radicals toward intramolecular addition
to the CdC bond. More electrophilic amidyl radicals are
generally more prone to cyclization. Our experimental investiga-
tion in combination with theoretical analyses has pointed out
6170 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 16, 2008