Published on Web 06/14/2008
Rapid and Enantioselective Synthetic Approaches to
Germanicol and Other Pentacyclic Triterpenes
Karavadhi Surendra and E. J. Corey*
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, HarVard UniVersity,
Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138
Received April 14, 2008; E-mail: corey@chemistry.harvard.edu
Abstract: Two exceedingly short synthetic routes to the key intermediate 2 for the synthesis of the
pentacyclic triterpene germanicol 1 have been developed. In the first, the (S)-epoxide of farnesyl bromide
is transformed in just three steps to the tetracyclic intermediate 7, which is converted to chiral 2 by
treatment with polyphosphoric acid. The second synthetic route to 2 involves the coupling of the (S)-
epoxide 8 with vinyl iodide 9 to give 10 and two-stage acid-catalyzed cyclization of 10 to form 2. During
the course of this work we have also discovered a very unusual intramolecular 1,5-proton shift from a
carbocation to a C-C double bond. The details of the process have been confirmed by 2H-labeling
experiments.
In 1970 the combined research groups of R. E. Ireland
and W. S. Johnson described a now classic synthesis of the
pentacyclic triterpenoid germanicol 1 in racemic form.1 The
difficulty of accessing the racemic structure can be readily
appreciated from the facts that (1) ca. 32 steps were required
and (2) only a 0.1% overall yield was reported. Because of
such difficulty shorter, more efficient, and enantioselective
syntheses of pentacyclic triterpenoids have remained a
formidable challenge to synthesis. The not unreasonable
possibility that the various parent pentacyclic triterpenes are
biosynthesized from (S)-2,3-oxidosqualene in a single step2
underscores the disparity between conventional multistep
synthesis and enzymically controlled biosynthesis. Nonethe-
less, until recent years there has not been significant progress
in this area because of the complexity of dealing with the
combination of numerous angular methyl groups and the large
steric repulsions that they cause. We disclose herein the
development of a short and quite efficient enantiocontrolled
route to germanicol that is based on methodology that has
recently been devised for targets of this sort.3,4 Our specific
plan was directed at the chiral pentacyclic target 2, the
racemic form of which was used by the Ireland and Johnson
groups to synthesize (()-germanicol. Two short and efficient
enantioselective routes to the pentacycle 2 have emerged, as
detailed herein.
The first synthetic pathway to 2 utilizes epoxide-initiated
cation-olefin polyannulation and starts with the readily
available chiral building block 3, which was obtained from
farnesyl acetate as described earlier.5 Coupling of 3 via the
corresponding bromide with the lithio derivative of the silyl
imine 4 provided the known acyl silane 56 (Scheme 1). The
epoxy triene 6 was assembled stereoselectively from 5,
2-propenyllithium, and 3-methoxybenzyl bromide in a single
step by a one-flask, three component coupling involving (1)
nucleophilic addition of 2-propenyllithium to the carbonyl
group of 5, (2) Brook rearrangement, and (3) 3-methoxy-
benzylation of the resulting allylic lithium intermediate.7 The
triene 6 was treated with 1.5 equiv of MeAlCl2 in CH2Cl2 at
-94 °C for 30 min to effect cationic cyclization. After
silylation with t-butyldimethylsilyl chloride (TBSCl), the
tetracyclic ketone 7 was obtained. Exposure of this product
to polyphosphoric acid at 23 °C for 30 min afforded directly
the target pentacycle 2, spectroscopically identical with the
Ireland-Johnson product. It is evident that the synthesis
outlined in Scheme 1 represents a major advance over the
original route to 2 in terms of brevity, efficiency, and
enantiocontrol.
The second effective approach to the synthesis of germa-
nicol via 2 is outlined in Scheme 2. The chiral epoxy diene
8, [R]D23 ) +8.7 (CHCl3), obtained from the (S)-epoxide of
geraniol5 by oxidation with activated MnO2 in C6H6 at 23 °C
followed by Wittig condensation with methylenetriph-
(1) Ireland, R. E.; Baldwin, S. W.; Dawson, D. J.; Dawson, M. I.; Dolfini,
J. E.; Newbould, J.; Johnson, W. S.; Brown, M.; Crawford, R. J.;
Hudrlik, P. F.; Rasmussen, G. H.; Schmiegel, K. K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1970, 92, 5743–5746.
(5) (a) Corey, E. J.; Noe, M. C.; Shieh, W-C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993,
34, 5995–5998. (b) Corey, E. J.; Noe, M. C.; Lin, S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1995, 36, 8741–8744. (c) Corey, E. J.; Zhang, J. Org. Lett. 2001,
3, 3211–3214. (d) Huang, J.; Corey, E. J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3455–
3458.
(2) Ku¨rti, L.; Chein, R.-J.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , Submitted for
publication.
(3) (a) For recent enantioselective synthesis of erythrodiol, oleanolic acid,
and ꢀ-amyrin, see Corey, E. J.; Lee, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
8873–8874. (b) Huang, A, X.; Xiong, Z.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 9999–10003. (c) For a very short synthesis of tritrepene
onorcerin, see Mi, Y.; Schreiber, J. V.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 11290–11291.
(6) Corey, E. J.; Lin, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8765–8766.
(7) (a) For other examples of this sequence, see Corey, E. J.; Luo, G.;
Lin, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9927–9928. (b) Corey, E. J.;
Luo, G.; Lin, L. S. Angew.Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1126–1128. (c)
Zhang, J.; Corey, E. J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3215–3216. (d) Mi, Y.;
Schreiber, J. V.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11290–
11291.
(4) For a recent review of epoxide-initiated cyclization, see Yoder, R. A.;
Johnston, J. N. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 4730–4756.
9
10.1021/ja802730a CCC: $40.75
2008 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2008, 130, 8865–8869 8865