C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 2. Confocal fluorescence images of live HeLa cells with increases in mitochondrial H2O2 levels visualized using MitoPY1. Images displayed represent
emission intensities collected in optical windows between 527 and 601 nm upon excitation at 510 nm for MitoPY1. HeLa cells incubated with 5 µM
MitoPY1 for 60 min at 37 °C and imaged with MitoPY1 (a), MitoTracker Red and Hoechst (overlay, b), and MitoPY1 with MitoTracker Red (overlay, c).
HeLa cells incubated with 5 µM MitoPY1 for 60 min at 37 °C with 100 µM H2O2 added for the final 40 min and imaged with MitoPY1 (d), MitoTracker
Red and Hoechst (overlay, e), MitoPY1 and MitoTracker Red (overlay, f), and brightfield (g) with 20 µm scale bar. HeLa cells incubated with 5 µM
MitoPY1 for 60 min at 37 °C and imaged with MitoPY1 (h), MitoTracker Red and Hoechst (overlay, i), and MitoPY1 with MitoTracker Red (overlay, j).
HeLa cells incubated for 24 h with 1 mM paraquat, then washed and incubated with 5 µM MitoPY1 for 60 min at 37 °C and imaged with MitoPY1 (k),
MitoTracker Red and Hoechst (overlay, l), MitoPY1 and MitoTracker Red (overlay, m), and brightfield (n) with 20 µm scale bar.
subcellular locations as determined by confocal microscopy (Figure
2a). Co-staining experiments with 50 nM MitoTracker Deep Red,
a commercially available mitochondrial indicator (Figure 2b,c), or
500 nM LysoTracker Red, a lysosomal indicator (Figures S4-S7),
establish that the observed fluorescence from MitoPY1 is localized
to the mitochondria of these live cells. Addition of 100 µM H2O2
to HeLa cells loaded with MitoPY1 display a marked localized
increase in fluorescence compared to control cells (Figure 2d-f).
Again, co-staining with MitoTracker confirms that the dye is
retained in the mitochondria and detects localized rises in H2O2
concentrations. Brightfield measurements and nuclear staining with
Hoechst 33342 indicate that the cells are viable throughout the
imaging experiments (Figures 2b,e,g). In addition, control experi-
ments using a probe lacking the phosphonium targeting moiety
(ContPY1, Figures S9-S12) or the oxidized probe (MitoPY1ox,
Figures S13-S18) confirm that only MitoPY1 targets the mito-
chondria, and complementary flow cytometry experiments (Figure
S8) provide supporting data over a larger population of cells.
Finally, analogous experiments in Cos-7, HEK293, and CHO.K1
cell lines give similar results and expand the scope of the probe
(Figures S5-S7). Taken together, these data establish that MitoPY1
is targeted to cellular mitochondria, where it can respond to
localized changes in H2O2 levels in living samples.
Finally, we sought to utilize MitoPY1 to visualize endogenous
production of H2O2 in the mitochondria of living cells. To this end,
we treated HeLa cells with paraquat, a small-molecule inducer of
oxidative stress that produces Parkinson’s-like phenotypes.19 The
images in Figure 2h-n show clear increases in mitochondrial-
localized H2O2 levels detected with MitoPY1 within cells that had
been exposed to 1 mM paraquat compared to control cells (IC50 of
paraquat in HeLa cells is 1.02 mM).20 These data indicate that
MitoPY1 is sensitive enough to detect local mitochondrial H2O2
elevations associated with oxidative stress in this Parkinson’s model.
To close, we have presented the synthesis, properties, and
biological applications of MitoPY1, a new targeted fluorescent probe
that can selectively detect H2O2 in the mitochondria of living cells.
Our data show that MitoPY1 is capable of imaging changes in the
levels of H2O2 within the mitochondria of a variety of mammalian
cell lines, as well as H2O2 elevations caused by an oxidative stress
model of Parkinson’s disease. In addition to applying MitoPY1 and
related chemical tools for studies of mitochondrial redox biology,
we anticipate that this modular probe scaffold should prove useful
for creating new multifunctional probes for targeting, activation,
and detection in living systems and are actively pursuing these
possibilities.
Acknowledgment. We thank the Beckman, Packard, and Sloan
Foundations, and the NIH (GM 79465) for providing funding for
this work. B.C.D. thanks the NIH Chemical Biology Graduate
Program (T32 GM066698) for support. We thank Holly Aaron
(UCB Molecular Imaging Center) and Ann Fischer (UCB Tissue
Culture Facility) for expert technical assistance.
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic and experimental
details (PDF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
(1) Rhee, S. G. Science 2006, 312, 1882–1883.
(2) Stone, J. R.; Yang, S. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2006, 8, 243–270.
(3) Veal, E. A.; Day, A. M.; Morgan, B. A. Mol. Cell 2007, 26, 1–14.
(4) D’Autre´aux, B.; Toledano, M. B. Nat. ReV. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 813–
824.
(5) Giorgio, M.; Trinei, M.; Migliaccio, E.; Pelicci, P. G. Nat. ReV. Mol. Cell
Biol. 2007, 8, 722–728.
(6) Poole, L. B.; Nelson, K. J. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2008, 12, 18–24.
(7) Finkel, T.; Serrano, M.; Blasco, M. A. Nature 2007, 448, 767–774.
(8) Barnham, K. J.; Masters, C. L.; Bush, A. I. Nat. ReV. Drug DiscoVery 2004,
3, 205–214.
(9) Lin, M. T.; Beal, M. F. Nature 2006, 443, 787–795.
(10) Schriner, S. E.; Jinford, N. J.; Martin, G. M.; Treuting, P.; Ogburn, C. E.;
Emond, M.; Coskun, P. E.; Ladiges, W.; Wolf, N.; Van Remmen, H.;
Wallace, D. C.; Rabinovitch, P. S. Science 2005, 308, 1909–1911.
(11) Belousov, V. V.; Fradkov, A. F.; Lukyanov, K. A.; Staroverov, D. B.;
Shakhbazov, K. S.; Terskikh, A. V.; Lukyanov, S. Nat. Methods 2006, 3,
281–286.
(12) Hanson, G. T.; Aggeler, R.; Oglesbee, D.; Cannon, M.; Capaldi, R. A.;
Tsien, R. Y.; Remington, S. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 13044–13053.
(13) Koide, Y.; Urano, Y.; Kenmoku, S.; Kojima, H.; Nagano, T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 10324–10325.
(14) Robinson, K. M.; Janes, M. S.; Pehar, M.; Monette, J. S.; Ross, M. F.;
Hagen, T. M.; Murphy, M. P.; Beckman, J. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2006, 103, 15038–15043.
(15) Murphy, M. P.; Smith, R. A. Annu. ReV. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2007, 47,
629–656.
(16) Hardy, M.; Chalier, F.; Ouari, O.; Finet, J.; Rockenbauer, A.; Kalyanaraman,
B.; Tordo, P. Chem. Commun. 2007, 1083–1085.
(17) Chang, M. C. Y.; Pralle, A.; Isacoff, E. Y.; Chang, C. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 15392–15393.
(18) Miller, E. W.; Tulyathan, O.; Isacoff, E. Y.; Chang, C. J. Nat. Chem. Biol.
2007, 3, 263–267.
(19) McCormack, A. L.; Thiruchelvam, M.; Manning-Bog, A. B.; Thiffault, C.;
Langtson, J. W.; Cory-Clechta, D. A.; Di Monte, D. A. Neurobiol. Dis.
2002, 10, 119–127.
(20) Park, S. Y.; Choi, J. EnViron. Int. 2007, 33, 817–822.
JA802355U
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 30, 2008 9639