Letters
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2008, Vol. 51, No. 15 4379
Scheme 2a
The intermediates 18-22, which lack the R2 substituent, were
also tested at the concentration of 200 µM, but they did not
show inhibitory activity (not included in Table 1).
Compounds 41, 42, 45, and 46 were synthesized to study
the importance of the carbonylaminothiourea part of the
backbone by replacing it with either a carbamoyl-methyl-amide
or a butyramide linker. These compounds showed only weak
inhibitory activities and confirmed the importance of carbony-
laminothiourea part of the scaffold for the inhibitory activity.
In conclusion, a new oxadiazole-carbonylaminothiourea scaf-
fold with inhibitory activity for SIRT1 and SIRT2 was found
through virtual screening. The series of compounds based on
this scaffold showed that each of the modified positions R1,
R2, and X were important for the inhibitory activity. For
example, replacement of aryl substituent with phenyl at either
position (R1 or R2) was not tolerated. At the R1 position, bulky
and lipophilic substituents were preferred over smaller or more
polar substituents such as phenyl and pyridyl. Modifications at
the R2 position indicated that the trifluoromethyl substituent of
the phenyl group is important for the inhibitory activity.
However, no specific binding has been observed for the
trifluoromethyl group in the binding model. In addition to its
high electronegativity, the trifluoromethyl group is known to
increase the lipophilicity of the compounds and therefore the
affinity of compounds in the hydrophobic binding sites, which
may lead to increased inhibitory activity of these compounds.
Modifications at the X positions indicated that the compounds
based on the oxadiazole-carbonylaminothiourea scaffold were
more potent than the compounds based on the oxadiazole-
carbonylaminourea scaffold. The relatively high acidity of the
NH thiourea protons compared to urea protons respectively is
correlated with a strong hydrogen-bonding donor capability, thus
providing efficient anchoring points of complementary func-
tional groups such as carboxyl group of D348 in the proposed
binding mode (Figure 2). The most potent compound 28 was
nearly as potent as the previously reported reference compound
1.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) triethylamine (1.1 equiv), ethyl
chloroformate (1.1 equiv), dichloromethane, -20 °C, 30 min.; (ii) triethy-
lamine (1.1 equiv), the appropriate aniline (1 equiv), rt, 1 d. (b) 25%
Trifluoroacetic acid/dichloromethane, 0 °C-rt, 2 h. (c) Compd 13 or 15
(1.1 equiv), triethylamine (1.1 equiv), methanol, 40 °C, 2-24 h.
Scheme 3a
a Reagents and conditions: (a) glutaric anhydride, few drops of DMF,
microwave 100 °C. (b) (i) Thionyl chloride (2.2 equiv), benzene, 60 °C,
1 h; (ii) the appropriate aniline (1.1 equiv), benzene, 0 °C-rt, 30 min.
similar to compound 1, while the other compounds had a weak
selectivity for SIRT2. Compound 2 (IC50 ) 57 µM) was the
most potent SIRT2 inhibitor in the series. Compounds 2, 28
(IC50 ) 113 µM), and 30 (IC50 ) 74 µM) and the reference
compound 1 (IC50 ) 79 µM) are equipotent inhibitors for
SIRT2.
Acknowledgment. This study was financially supported by
Finnish Cultural Foundation. We thank Tiina Koivunen and Erja
Kivioja for technical assistance.
Compounds 2, 28 (X ) S, R2 ) 3-CF3-Ph), and 23, 30, 32,
34, 35 (X ) S, R2 ) 4-CF3-Ph) and 31, 33 (X ) S, R2 )
4-F-Ph) were synthesized to study the modifications at the R1
position. 4-tert-butylphenyl, 1-naphthyl, and 3-(Boc-amino)-
phenyl groups were preferred as R1 substituents and showed
active compounds (23, 30, and 35). However, the compounds
with the phenyl and 3-pyridyl groups as R1 substituents had a
strongly decreased (32) or no detectable (34) inhibitory activity.
Compounds 28, 29 (R1 ) 1-naphthyl, R2 ) 3-CF3-Ph) and
25, 26 (R1 ) 4-t-Bu-Ph, R2 ) Ph) were synthesized to study
the modifications at the X position, but the results were not
consistent. Compound 28 with the thiourea group showed a
preference for SIRT1 over SIRT2 (IC50 ) 13 µM and 113 µM,
respectively). Compound 29 with the urea group was an
equipotent SIRT2 inhibitor (IC50 ) 257 µM, 51% at 200 µM)
but clearly a weaker SIRT1 inhibitor (12% inhibition at 200
µM) as compared to compound 28. Compounds 2, 23, 26 (R1
) 4-t-Bu-Ph, X ) S), 28, 30, 31 (R1 ) 1-naphthyl, X ) S),
24, 25, 27 (R1 ) 4-t-Bu-Ph, X ) O), and 32, 33 (R1 ) Ph, X
) S) were synthesized to study the modifications at the R2
position. The para and meta substituted (trifluoromethyl)-phenyl
groups (2 and 23, 28 and 30) were preferred over phenyl (26)
or 4-fluorophenyl group (31) at the R2 position. However, all
combinations with different R1 and X groups were not made.
Supporting Information Available: Database screening pro-
cedure, detailed experimental procedures for the syntheses, NMR
spectra, ESI-MS results, and elemental analysis data for the new
compounds and in vitro assay for SIRT1 and SIRT2 activities are
described. This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
(1) Porcu, M.; Chiarugi, A. The emerging therapeutic potential of sirtuin-
interacting drugs: from cell death to lifespan extension. Trends
Pharmacol. Sci. 2005, 26, 94–103.
(2) Milne, J. C.; Denu, J. M. The Sirtuin family: therapeutic targets to
treat diseases of aging. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2008, 12, 11–17.
(3) Neugebauer, R. C.; Sippl, W.; Jung, M. Inhibitors of NAD+ dependent
histone deacetylases (sirtuins). Curr. Pharm. Des. 2008, 14, 562–573.
(4) Napper, A. D.; Hixon, J.; McDonagh, T.; Keavey, K.; Pons, J. F.;
Barker, J.; Yau, W. T.; Amouzegh, P.; Flegg, A.; Hamelin, E.; Thomas,
R. J.; Kates, M.; Jones, S.; Navia, M. A.; Saunders, J. O.; DiStefano,
P. S.; Curtis, R. Discovery of indoles as potent and selective inhibitors
of the deacetylase SIRT1. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 8045–54.
(5) Bedalov, A.; Gatbonton, T.; Irvine, W. P.; Gottschling, D. E.; Simon,
J. A. Identification of a small molecule inhibitor of Sir2p. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 15113–15118.
(6) Posakony, J.; Hirao, M.; Stevens, S.; Simon, J. A.; Bedalov, A.
Inhibitors of Sir2: evaluation of splitomicin analogues. J. Med. Chem.
2004, 47, 2635–44.