occurred to us that designing a chiral template to obtain
aminocyclitols (natural and synthetic) would be an important
contribution to this area. In this context, we envisioned the
potential of substrate 8 for the synthesis of various ami-
nocyclohexanols. Compound 8 could easily be obtained from
optically pure 7-azabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-one 6, synthesized
by us a few years ago9 via asymmetric desymmetrization of
meso-4 (Scheme 1). We had developed this strategy to
synthesize (-)-epibatidine,10 a powerful non-opiod analgesic.
Scheme 2
.
Imaginative Pathway for the Synthesis of
Aminocyclitols
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Chiral Template 8
AcOH, 60 psi) provided 6 in 70% yield as a diastereomeri-
cally pure compound12 along with the recovery of starting
material 5 (30%) (Scheme 1).
We hoped that reduction of 6 with lithium borohydride
would furnish only 8, owing to endo-attack of the hydride
on carbonyl group. However, it unexpectedly gave a dia-
stereomeric mixture of alcohols 7 and 8 (1:9) (Scheme 3).
The idea of utilizing 8 as a chiral template for the synthesis
of aminocyclitols in general emerged from its rigid bicyclic
structure11 and suitably juxtaposed functionalities for its easy
transformation to aminocyclohexenol derivative 9 useful for
the synthesis of scores of aminocyclitols as described in
Scheme 2. In this paper, we disclose our preliminary results
on the successful demonstration of the synthesis and use of
8 as a chiral template for the synthesis of aminocyclitols.
Desymmetrized compound 5 was obtained in 80% yield
(99% de) by asymmetric desymmetrization of meso-4 by
employing our previously described protocol.9 Removal of
the ketal moiety from 5 by hydrogenation (Pd/C, 10 mol%,
Scheme 3. Reduction of Ketone
(6) Alegret, C.; Benet-Buchholz, J.; Riera, A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3069–
3072, and references cited therein.
(7) (a) Kelebekli, L.; Celik, M.; Sahin, E.; Kara, Y.; Balci, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 7031–7035. (b) Spielvogel, D.; Kammerer, J.;
Prinzbach, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7863–7867. (c) Akgun, H.;
Hudlicky, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3081–3084. (d) Jotterand, N.;
Vogel, P. Synlett 1998, 1237–1239. (e) Trost, B. M.; Pulley, S. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 8737–8740. (f) Leung-Toung, R.; Liu, Y.;
Muchowski, J. M.; Wu, Y.-L. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3235–3250.
(8) (a) Pandey, G.; Kapur, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8821–8824.
(b) Pandey, G.; Kapur, M. Synthesis 2001, 1263–1267. (c) Pandey, G.;
Kapur, M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3883–3886. (d) Pandey, G.; Kapur, M.; Khan,
M. I.; Gaikwad, S. M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3321–3326. (e) Pandey,
G.; Dumbre, S. G.; Khan, M. I.; Shabab, M.; Puranik, V. G. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2006, 47, 7923–7926. (f) Pandey, G.; Dumbre, S. G.; Khan, M. I.;
Shabab, M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8481–8488. (g) Pandey, G.; Dumbre,
S. G.; Pal, S.; Khan, M. I.; Shabab, M. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 4756–4761.
(9) Pandey, G.; Tiwari, S. K.; Singh, R. S.; Mali, R. S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2001, 42, 3947–3949.
Fortunately, both diastereomers could be easily separated by
silica gel column chromatography.
The relative configurations of both alcohols were unam-
biguously deduced from their 1H NMR spectrum in CDCl3.
For illustration, the H-2 in 7 appeared as dd (J ) 9.3, 4.4
Hz) coupling with bridgehead H-1 and H-3 whereas H-3
appeared as ddd (J ) 9.6, 9.3, 4.6 Hz) coupling with H-2,
bridgehead H-4 and -OH. The coupling with -OH (J ) 9.6
Hz) was confirmed by D2O exchange which simplified the
coupling to dd (J ) 9.3, 4.6 Hz). Similarly, in the case of 8,
the H-2 showed doublet (J ) 6.5 Hz) coupling only with
H-3, whereas H-3 appeared as dd (J ) 9.7, 6.5 Hz) coupling
with H-2 as well as O-H indicating the endo-orientation
for H-3. This observation is in complete agreement with the
(10) Spand, T. F.; Garraffo, H. M.; Edwards, M. W.; Yeh, H. J. C.;
Pannell, L.; Daly, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 3475–3478.
(11) (a) For 7-azanorbornane systems, see: Hernandez, A.; Marcos, M.;
Rapoport, H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2683–2691. (b) Moreno-Vargas, A. J.;
Robina, I.; Petricci, E.; Vogel, P. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 4487–4491, and
references cited therein. (c) Wei, Z.-L.; George, C.; Kozikowski, A. P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3847–3850.
(12) The observed NMR splitting pattern in 6 is because of restricted
rotation about the NCO bond (rotamers). For similar observations, see: Pavri,
N. P.; Trudell, M. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 7993–7996.
3612
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 16, 2008