Methods to prepare aryloxetanes include the addition of
aryllithium reagents to oxetan-3-one, followed by reductive-
deoxygenation,1 and the cyclization of 2-aryl-1,3 diols.4,5 We
sought a more general alternative to existing techniques and
were drawn to the possibility of an alkyl-aryl Suzuki
coupling,6 since it presented a convergent substitute to
previous methodology. The development of such reactions
has received considerable attention in contemporary organic
synthesis, and among the most accomplished methods for
undertaking this transformation is a series of nickel-mediated
reactions developed by Fu.7 In this paper we show that a
Fu-variant of the Suzuki coupling can be used to introduce
both oxetan-3-yl and azetidin-3-yl substiuents into aromatic
and heteroaromatic systems. Additionally, we show that the
majority of isolated oxetan-3-yl products do not conjugate
glutathione when examined in an in vitro screen for reactive
metabolites.
Table 1. Alkyl-Aryl Suzuki Coupling To Install the
Oxetan-3-yl Substituent into Aryl Systems
Our initial experiments at introducing the oxetan-3-yl
group examined reactions between 3-iodooxetane8 and an
appropriate arylboronic acid using a catalyst derived from
nickel(II) iodide and trans-2-aminocyclohexanol (Table 1).
These conditions were employed since Gonza´lez-Bobes and
Fu had demonstrated that the reactants required no special
handling and that microwave irradiation could be used to
accelerate the coupling process, giving rise to the Suzuki
products rapidly.7b The use of such a method would therefore
have obvious attractions for those working in an industrial
environment, where ease of synthesis can be a major
influence on the desirability to pursue a given transformation.
To our delight, we found that the Suzuki coupling proceeded
smoothly when 2 equiv of the boronic acid was used,9 giving
rise to 3-aryloxetanes in moderate-to-good yield. In some
cases a major byproduct was also produced (vide infra).
Additionally, a small quantity of biaryl, arising from homo-
coupling of the boronic acid starting material, was also
obtained in most examples. As can be seen from Table 1,
the reaction tolerated a number of common functional groups
such as alkyl, trifluoromethyl, ether, thioether, ester, nitrile,
tertiary amine, ketone, chloro, and fluoro. Additionally,
ortho-, meta-, and para-substituted boronic acids could be
coupled efficiently (entries 1-12). We also used the reaction
to prepare 3-(3-bromophenyl)oxetane (entry 13). The prepa-
ration of this compound is significant, as it demonstrates that
selectivity in coupling can be accomplished between iodoal-
a Isolated yield from reaction with ArB(OH)2 (2.0 equiv), NiI2 (0.06
equiv), trans-2-aminocyclohexanol hydrochloride (0.06 equiv), 3-iodoox-
etane (1.0 equiv), NaHMDS (2.0 equiv), and iPrOH; 80 °C, µwave, 20 min.
b Desired oxetane product as methyl ester (18% yield) also isolated.
c Acetophenone (22%) also isolated.
(4) (a) Searles, S.; Hummel, D. G.; Nukina, S.; Throckmorton, P. E.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 2928. (b) Castro, B.; Selve, C. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1973, 45, 4459. (c) Picard, P.; Leclercq, D.; Bats, J. P.; Moulines, J.
Synthesis 1981, 550. (d) Robinson, P. L.; Barry, C. N.; Kelly, J. W.; Evans,
S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 5210. (e) Katritzky, A. R.; Fan, W.; Li,
kane- and arylbromide-containing starting materials. Previ-
ously, only selectivity between bromo- and chloro-alkanes
had been illustrated, although the increased reactivity of
iodides over bromides had been noted.7b,c Additionally, 3-(3-
bromophenyl)oxetane contains a handle for further manipula-
tion via palladium-, nickel-, and copper-mediated processes
and is thus a valuable building block.
Next, we turned our attention to the introduction of the
oxetan-3-yl motif into heteroaromatic and bicyclic systems.
As can be seen from Table 2, mixed results were obtained.
Q. Youji Huaxue 1988, 8, 53
.
(5) For alternative synthesis of 3-aryloxetanes, see: (a) Yates, P.; Szabo,
A. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1965, 37, 485. (b) Nerdel, F.; Kaminski, H.; Frank,
D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 39, 4973. (c) Delmond, B.; Pommier, J. C.;
Valade, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1969, 41, 2089. (d) Lewis, F. D.; Turro, N. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 311. (e) Delmond, B.; Pommier, J. C.; Valade,
J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1973, 47, 337
.
(6) For a review see: Netherton, M. R.; Fu, G. C. In Topics in
Organometallic Chemistry: Palladium in Organic Synthesis; Tsuji, J., Ed.;
Springer: New York, 2005; pp 85-108.
(7) (a) Zhou, J.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1340. (b)
Gonza´lez-Bobes, F.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5360. (c)
Saito, B.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9602.
(8) Clark, S. L.; Polak, R. J.; Wojtowicz, J. A. US 1966-557376.
(9) Other conditions were not investigated.
3260
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 15, 2008