Organic Letters
Letter
a b
,
first reported an unprecedented chelation-assisted strategy that
elegantly employs a removable bidentate 8-aminoquinoline
auxiliary to dictate regioselective carbopalladation, stabilize the
putative alkylpalladium(II) intermediate, and facilitate sub-
sequent protodepalladation to afford hydrofunctionalized
products.8,9 A series of regioselective hydrofunctionalization10
and 1,2-difunctionalization11 reactions of unbiased aliphatic
alkenes with a broad range of nucleophiles have been
successively accomplished using this strategy.12 To fully realize
the feasibility of unactivated alkene hydroarylation with readily
available organosilicon reagents, we envisioned that such a
reaction may potentially be achieved through the judicious use
of the proximal auxiliary-directed strategy to enable regiose-
lective syn-1,2-migratory insertion of the Pd−aryl moiety into
C−C π-bonds to form the chelation-stabilized five-membered
palladacycle species, which would effectively suppress the
competing β-hydride elimination, thus allowing the putative
alkylpalladium(II) intermediate to be intercepted by a proton
source to afford the hydrofunctionalized product (Scheme 1b).
Inspired by recent work on alkene hydrofunctionalization
reactions and with our continuous efforts in silicon-based
cross-coupling reactions,13 we describe herein a general
procedure for the palladium(II)-catalyzed chelation-assisted
intermolecular anti-Markovnikov hydroarylation reaction of
unactivated 3-butenoic acid derivatives with sterically and
electronically diverse (hetero)arylsilanes under redox-neutral
conditions. This silicon-based protocol is compatible with both
terminal and internal unactivated aliphatic alkenes, providing a
straightforward access to a wide range of synthetically valuable
γ-aryl butyric acid derivatives that are important skeletons
frequently encountered in numerous pharmaceutically relevant
molecules (see Scheme 1).14
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
entry
catalyst
additive
solvent
yield
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OTFA)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
AgF
NaF
KF
CsF
ZnF2
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
13
<5
<5
<5
0
c
TBAF
0
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
56
65
73
48
67
82
58
67
73
toluene
dioxane
MeCN
acetone
THF
10
11
12
13
14
15
THF
THF
THF
d
e
a
Reaction conditions: [Pd] catalyst (0.02 mmol, 10 mol %), 1a (0.2
mmol), trimethoxyphenylsilane 2a (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv), additive
(0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv), H2O (2.0 mmol, 10 equiv), solvent (2.0 mL),
at 100 °C for 24 h. Isolated yields. TBAF (1.0 mol/L in THF). At
b
c
d
e
80 °C. Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %).
We commenced the investigation by using 3-butenoic acid
derivative 1a bearing Daugulis’s 8-aminoquinoline directing
group as the model substrate and trimethoxyphenylsilane 2a as
the coupling partner to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed
hydroarylation reaction (see Table 1). During initial screening,
we were pleased to observe the formation of the desired anti-
Markovnikov hydroarylation product 3a in 13% yield by using
10 mol % of Pd(OAc)2 as the catalyst, 2.0 equiv of AgF as the
silane activator, and 10 equiv of water as the proton source at
100 °C in 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) for 24 h (Table 1, entry
1). Other fluorides such as NaF, KF, CsF, ZnF2, or TBAF were
ineffective in activating the C−Si bond in this reaction (Table
1, entries 2−6), and copper(II) fluoride was found to be the
best choice to afford 3a in 56% yield (Table 1, entry 7).
Subsequently, through extensive screening of various solvents,
we identified tetrahydrofuran (THF) to be the most effective
solvent to generate the product 3a in 82% yield (Table 1, entry
12). In addition, palladium(II) trifluoroacetate proved to be
reactive for this transformation, albeit in moderate yield (Table
1, entry 13). Further evaluation demonstrated that lowering
the temperature to 80 °C or decreasing the catalyst loading to
5 mol % resulted in a reduced yield (Table 1, entries 14 and
15). Finally, alkene substrates bearing other bidentate
auxiliaries either afforded a trace amount of product or failed
to give any desired product.
66%, and 81%, respectively. No reaction occurred with
phenyltrimethylsilane, phenylmethoxydimethylsilane and phe-
nyldimethylsilanol as coupling partners. The reaction of several
ortho-substituted arylsilanes with 3-butenamide 1a proceeded
smoothly to generate the corresponding products 3b−3e in
high yields (69%−84%). Moreover, meta-substituted arylsi-
lanes could tolerate this hydroarylation reaction (3f−3i).
Remarkably, a variety of arylsilanes bearing both electron-
donating and electron-withdrawing functional groups at the
para-position produced the desired products in yields from
46% to 76% (3j−3u). Gratifyingly, naphthylsilanes also proven
to be favorable coupling partners to afford the products 3v and
3w in yields of 78% and 63%, respectively. Notably, a broad
range of disubstituted and trisubstituted arylsilanes reacted
well under the optimized conditions (3x−3ao), whereas
sterically congested mesityltrimethoxysilane 2ap resulted in
18% yield. Note that this silicon-based protocol is also
compatible with diverse heteroarylsilanes, enabling the
formation of products 3aq−3av in satisfactory yields (49%−
75%).
To further extend this protocol, we turned to evaluate the
generality of this hydroarylation reaction with both terminal
and internal unbiased aliphatic alkenes (Scheme 3). Generally,
a variety of α-substituted terminal alkenes were found to be
suitable substrates and underwent anti-Markovnikov hydro-
arylation reaction in good yields (4b−4d). Alkene substrates
bearing a single substituent at the β-position reacted to give
product 4e in a moderate yield (38%), revealing the obvious
steric inhibition on the reactivity of this reaction. Encourag-
ingly, this approach was very compatible with unactivated
internal alkenes; an array of simple and functionalized alkyl-
With these optimized reaction conditions established, we
proceeded to evaluate the substrate scope of this γ-selective
hydroarylation reaction. Initially, a series of phenylsilicon
reagents were investigated. As shown in Scheme 2, the use of
phenyltriethoxysilane, phenyldimethoxymethylsilane, and di-
phenyldimethoxysilane gave the product 3a in yields of 79%,
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX