SCHEME 4. Completion the Synthesis of 1 and Its 2′-Epimer by Aldol Reaction
the allyl ether 20 in 81% yield.16 The PMB protecting group
was then removed in the presence of DDQ,17 followed by IBX
oxidation18 of the resulting alcohol to provide the corresponding
ketone 22 in 74% yield in two steps. Attempts to reduce the
epoxide 22 by using Zn powder and NaI was unsuccessful.19
After several experimentations, a practical method of reducing
the epoxide based on the work of Adams20 was realized by using
NaI/TFA as the reductant. Thus, the preparation of the optically
pure R,ꢀ-unsaturated cyclohexenone 3 was accomplished in 10
steps and 24% overall yield from (R)-(-)-carvone.
With the acid 4 and R,ꢀ-unsaturated cyclohexenone 3 in hand,
we focused our efforts on the formation of the malyngamide U
skeleton by an aldol reaction (Scheme 4.) Thus, amidation of
acid 4 with ethanolamine in the presence of N-(3-dimethylami-
nopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI) and 1-hy-
droxybenzotriazole (HOBt) produced 23 in 78% yield.21 Oxi-
dation of the primary alcohol 23 with IBX provided the key
intermediate amido-aldehyde 2.18 Aldol condensation of 2 with
the enolate of R,ꢀ-unsaturated cyclohexenone 3 generated in
the presence of LDA in THF at -78 °C afforded the desired
product 24a and its 2′-epimer 24b in a diastereomeric ratio of
4:1. The desired major product 24a could be readily separated
from the minor epimer 24b by column chromatography. The
absolute configuration of C-2′ in compound 24a was confirmed
by a modified method described by Mosher.22 Hence, compound
24a was converted to its (S)- and (R)-MTPA esters. The
chemical shift values of H-1′ and H-1′′ protons were ascertained
for both esters from COSY experiments. The ∆δ () δS - δR)
values (+0.05 ppm for H-1′, +0.68 ppm for NH, and -0.04
ppm for H-1′′) revealed that the absolute configuration of C-2′
was (S) for 24a. At this stage, we were faced with the task of
methylating the ꢀ-hydroxy ketone 24 without promoting epimer-
ization of the C-1′′ stereocenter, retro-aldol cleavage, or
dehydration reactions. Several procedures, including MeI/Ag2O,
various catalyzed diazomethane variants, Meerwein’s salt in the
presence of excess Proton Pronge, methyl triflate and 2,6-di-
tert-butyl-4-methylpyridine were met with limited success.23 It
was ultimately found that treatment 24a and 24b with Ag2O in
neat MeI in the presence of dry CaSO4 smoothly promoted
methylation to give 25a and 25b in 66% yield and 71% yield,
respectively.24 Compound 25a could also be obtained by
Mitsunobu reaction of 24b in 70% yield.25 Finally, removal of
the allyl protecting group with PdCl2 in MeOH/CH2Cl2 ) 3:2
completed the synthesis of malyngamide U (1) and 2′-epi-1.26
The spectral data of 1 were in good agreement with those
reported in literature.3
In summary, an efficient synthesis of malyngamide U (1) and
2′-epi-1 was accomplished in 13 steps in 2.7% and 0.4% overall
yield, respectively. This compared favorably with our previous
reported method in which 18 steps were involved and the target
compound was obtained in only 0.04% overall yield.3 The
preparation of the chiral γ,δ-unsaturated acid 4 was achieved
in 6 steps and 43% overall yield from n-hexanal. The efficient
asymmetric synthesis of malyngamide U (1) and its 2′-epimer
should offer a convenient entry to other structurally related
malyngamides (Figure 1). Further studies on the total synthesis
of these malyngamides are currently underway in our laboratory.
Experimental Section
(4E,7S)-N-{(2S)-[(1R,6R)-6-Allyloxy-3-methyl-2-oxocyclohex-3-
en-1-yl]-2-hydroxyethyl}-7-methoxydodec-4-enamide (24a) and
(4E,7S)-N-{(2R)-[(1R,6R)-6-allyloxy-3-methyl-2-oxocyclohex-3-en-
1-yl]-2-hydroxyethyl}-7-methoxydodec-4-enamide (24b). To a solu-
tion of amide alcohol 23 (180 mg, 0.66 mmol) in dry EtOAc (7
mL) was added IBX (557 mg, 1.99 mmol). The resulting suspension
was immersed in an oil bath set to 80 °C and stirred vigorously
under atmosphere for 7 h. The reaction was cooled to room
temperature and filtered through a medium glass frit. The filter cake
was washed with EtOAc (3 mL), and the filtrate was concentrated
in vacuo. Flash chromatography of the residue over silica gel using
¨
(16) Sezer, S.; Ozdemirhan, D.; S¸ahin, E.; Tanyeli, C. Tetrahedron: Asym-
metry 2006, 17, 2981.
(17) Schmidt, J. P.; Beltra´n-Rodil, S.; Cox, R. J.; McAllister, G. D.; Reid,
M.; Taylor, R. J. K. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4041.
(18) More, J. D.; Finney, N. S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3001.
(19) Cane, D. E.; Yang, G.; Coates, R. M.; Pyun, H. J.; Hohn, T. M. J. Org.
Chem. 1992, 57, 3454.
(20) Adams, J.; Lepine-Frenette, C.; Spero, D. M. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56,
4494.
(21) Nicolaou, K. C.; Chen, D. Y. K.; Huang, X.; Ling, T.; Bella, M.; Snyder,
S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12888.
(22) Ohtanoi, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1991, 113, 4092.
(23) Evans, D. A.; Ratz, A. M.; Huff, B. E.; Sheppard, G. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 3448.
(24) Brummond, K. M.; Hong, S. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 907.
(25) Mitsunonu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1.
(26) Ko¨nig, C. M.; Harms, K.; Koert, U. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4777.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 17, 2008 6875