had to be based on mass spectrometry (coupled with gas
chromatography), microreactions, and independent synthesis.
The 70 eV-EI mass spectrum of the target compound is
depicted in Figure 1.
parent carbonyl compound involved in the formation of the
target compound was regarded to be 3-pentanone. Conse-
quently, 2,2-diethyl-1,3-dioxanes or 2,2-diethyl-1,3-diox-
olanes, carrying the remaining carbons as alkyl substituents,
were considered to be suitable candidates. Finally, two less
abundant signals in the mass spectrum, detected at m/z 128
(C8H16O upon HR-MS) and m/z 114 (C7H14O upon HR-MS)
(Figure 1), proved to represent key fragments decisive for
structure elucidation. Earlier it had been shown that upon
electron impact 4,5-dialkyl-1,3-dioxolanes extrude carbonyl
fragments consisting of an alkyl substituent, the correspond-
ing ring-carbon, and the adjacent oxygen.11 In the present
case, this was suggested to be acetaldehyde giving rise to
M+-44 ) m/z 128 and acetone or propanal producing M+-
58 ) m/z 114. Consequently, the target compound was
considered to be either 2,2-diethyl-4,4,5-trimethyl-1,3-diox-
olane or 2,2,4-triethyl-5-methyl-1,3-dioxolane.
The former compound, prepared upon boron trifluoride
catalyzed reaction12 of 3-pentanone and 2,2,3-trimethylox-
irane, yielded a mass spectrum similar to that of the natural
product (see Supporting Information); however, the gas
chromatographic retention time did not match. We, therefore,
synthesized both racemic cis-2,2,4-triethyl-5-methyl-1,3-
dioxolane (cis-1) and its trans-isomer. Boron trifluoride
catalyzed reaction of 3-pentanone with either trans-2-ethyl-
3-methyloxirane (trans-2) (obtained from (E)-2-pentene upon
epoxidation with m-chloroperbenzoic acid) or cis-2-ethyl-
3-methyloxirane (cis-2) (from (Z)-2-pentene) produced the
desired dioxolanes in good yields (Figure 2). NMR data of
Figure 1. Mass spectrum (70 eV-EI) of (4S,5S)-2,2,4-triethyl-5-
methyl-1,3-dioxolane (trans-1).
The fragment with the highest mass recorded was repre-
sented by a signal at m/z 143. High resolution mass
spectrometry (GC/HR-MS) of the corresponding ion showed
an atomic composition of m/z 143 ) C8H15O2. Chemical
ionization analysis (GC/CI-MS) revealed the molecular mass
of the natural product to be M+ ) 172. As a result, its
molecular formula proved to be either C10H20O2 (m/z 143 )
M-ethyl) or C9H16O3 (m/z 143 ) M-formyl), exhibiting either
one or two degrees of unsaturation, respectively. Because
of its relatively low Kovats index of 1156 on a polar GC
column (SupelcoWax-10),7 which indicated low polarity, the
latter atomic composition was regarded less likely. As a
consequence, the structure of the unknown was expected
either to be cyclic or to contain a carbonyl group or a CC
double bond. The latter case was ruled out because the
compound could not be catalytically hydrogenated.8 The
intense signal at m/z 143 indicated a rather stable fragment,
supposedly due to the formation of an oxonium ion.
Corresponding structures are typically formed upon R-cleav-
age from secondary and tertiary alcohols or ketones as well
as from ethers and acetals (including cyclic structures).9,10
As acetylation8 failed and because of the low Kovats index
of the compound, alcohol structures were considered less
likely.
Figure 2. Synthesis of racemic and optically active 2,2,4-triethyl-
5-methyl-1,3-dioxolanes.
the products were as expected. Upon gas chromatography,
the diastereomers were well resolved (R ) tr cis/tr trans )
1.10 on CP-Sil 5 and 1.02 on FFAP). While the mass spectra
of both isomers matched that of the natural product, the gas
chromatographic retention time of trans-2,2,4-triethyl-5-
methyl-1,3-dioxolane coincided with that of the target
Based on the analytical information obtained so far, the
natural product was hypothesized to be a cyclic acetal.
Because of the large amounts of 3-pentanone present in the
metasternal glands and the abundant signal at m/z 143 )
M+-ethyl in the mass spectrum of the target compound, the
(8) Attygalle, A. B. In Methods in Chemical Ecology 2; Millar, J. G.,
Haynes, K. E., Eds.; Kluwer: New York, 1998; pp 207-294.
(11) Friedel, R. A.; Sharkey, A. G., Jr. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 940.
(12) Blackett, B. N.; Coxon, J. M.; Hartshorn, M. P.; Lewis, A. J.
Tetrahedron 1970, 26, 1311.
(9) Francke, W.; Kitching, W. Curr. Org. Chem. 2001, 5, 233
.
(10) Marshall, J. T. B.; Williams, D. H. Tetrahedron 1967, 23, 321
.
5602
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 24, 2010