C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 3
oxidation on the 1K array was also effective for developing site-
selective Ce(IV) oxidations on the more dense 12K microelectrode
array.
In conclusion, we have found that Ce(IV) oxidations can be
performed in a site-selective fashion on both 1K- and 12K-microelec-
trode arrays. Additionally, it was found that the site-selective reactions
could be performed using the same reagents employed for a solution-
phase reaction. This allowed for a very simple approach to developing
site-selective reactions. To this end, a solution phase oxidation was
modified by removing the stoichiometric amount of ceric ammonium
nitrate normally used and replacing it with a catalytic amount of the
oxidant. The mixture was stirred overnight to allow for complete
consumption of the oxidant. An electrolyte was added followed by
insertion into the solution of a microelectrode array functionalized with
a substrate for the oxidation. Selected microelectrodes in the array were
then turned on as anodes to regenerate the oxidant exclusively at sites
where it was desired. The excess substrate in the reaction served as
the confining agent. Both the use of ceric ammonium nitrate on the
microelectrodes and the overall strategy used in its development should
prove extremely useful for the construction of addressable molecular
libraries in the future. Efforts along these lines are currently underway.
phase substrate would serve as the confining agent in solution needed
for preventing the migration of any Ce(IV) reagent generated to remote
locations on the array. The result would be an approach for developing
a site-selective microelectrode-array oxidation that capitalized on the
same reagents and substrates used for the solution phase reaction. One
would simply take the solution-phase reaction, reduce the amount of
oxidant used to a catalytic amount, add an electrolyte, and then use
the solution on the microelectrode array to effect the site-selective
reaction.
In practice, 1 equiv of ceric ammonium nitrate and 10 equiv of
activated ester 6 were added to dichloromethane and stirred overnight.
To this mixture were added tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate
as an electrolyte for the electrolysis and pyrene butanol in order to
trap any N-acyliminium ion generated. The surface functionalized
microelectrode array 7 was then inserted into the solution and a
checkerboard pattern of microelectrodes used as anodes at a potential
of +2.0 V relative to a remote platinum wire cathode. The reaction
was run for 300 cycles where the selected microelectrodes were turned
on for 0.5 s and off for 0.1 s. It was found that turning the current on
for longer periods of time led to a deterioration in the amount of current
that could be passed. Following the reaction, the array was removed
from the solution, washed to remove any unbound pyrene butanol,
and then imaged using a fluorescence microscope (Figure 1a).
Acknowledgment. This work is generously supported by the
National Science Foundation (CHE-9023698). We also gratefully
acknowledge the Washington University High Resolution NMR
facility, partially supported by NIH grants RR02004, RR05018, and
RR07155, and the Washington University Mass Spectrometry Resource
Center, partially supported by NIHRR00954, for their assistance.
Supporting Information Available: Spectral data for all new
compounds are provided along with sample procedures for conducting the
microelectrode array reactions. This material is available free of charge
References
(1) For a description of the chips used here, see: Dill, K.; Montgomery, D. D.;
Wang, W.; Tsai, J. C. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 444, 69. Electrode diameter
) 92 µm: Distance between the Pt electrodes (rectangular cells) ) 245.3
and 337.3 µM.
(2) For alternative approaches, see: (a) Sullivan, M. G.; Utomo, H.; Fagan,
P. J.; Ward, M. D. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 4369. (b) Zhang, S.; Zhao, H.;
John, R. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 421, 175. (c) Hintsche, R.; Albers, J.;
Bernt, H.; Eder, A. Electroanalysis 2000, 12, 660.
(3) (a) Tesfu, E.; Roth, K.; Maurer, K.; Moeller, K. D. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
709. (b) Stuart, M.; Maurer, K.; Moeller, K. D. Bioconjugate Chem.
2008, DOI: 10.1021/bc800025z.
(4) For Pd(II) reactions, see ref 3a as well as: (a) Tesfu, E.; Maurer, K.;
Ragsdale, S. R.; Moeller, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6212–6213.
(b) Tesfu, E.; Maurer, K.; McShae, A.; Moeller, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 70.
(5) For a Pd(0) reactions, see: (a) Tian, J.; Maurer, K.; Tesfu, E.; Moeller,
K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1392. (b) Tang, F.; Chen, C.; Moeller,
K. D. Synthesis 2007, 3411. (c) Chen, C.; Lu, P.; Walker, A.; Maurer, K.;
Moeller, K. D. Electrochem. Commun. 2008, 10, 973.
(6) For examples of the site-selective generation of base, see ref 3b as well as:
Maurer, K.; McShea, A.; Strathmann, M.; Dill, K. J. Comb. Chem. 2005,
7, 637.
(7) For the site-selective generation of acid, see: Kesselring, D.; Maurer, K.;
Moeller, K. D. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2501.
A checkerboard pattern of fluorescence on the microelectrode
array was obtained indicating site selective formation of the
N-acyliminium ion intermediate from the silyl-substituted amide.
No loss of confinement was observed. Clearly, the simple strategy
taken for generating a reduced cerium substrate for the electrolysis
and confining Ce(IV) to the selected microelectrodes was very
effective.
The site-selective ceric ammonium nitrate oxidation could also be
accomplished using an array having 12 544 microelectrodes cm-2 (a
12K array). This was important because the 12K arrays are used in
electrochemical signaling experiments.3 Using the same conditions
employed for the 1K array, the image in Figure 1b was generated using
a 12K array by employing a checkerboard pattern of electrodes inside
a box as anodes for the oxidation. Once again, a high level of
confinement of the reaction to the selected electrodes was observed.
The very simple strategy used for developing the site-selective Ce(IV)
(8) Chen, C.; Nagy, G.; Walker, A. V.; Maurer, K.; McShae, A.; Moeller,
K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16020. as well as ref 5c.
(9) For example, see: (a) Inokuchi, T.; Ping, L.; Hamaue, F.; Izawa, M.; Torii,
S. Chem. Lett. 1994, 121. (b) Miller, D. G.; Wayner, D. D. M. Can. J. Chem.
1992, 70, 2485.
(10) Hwu, J. R.; King, K.-Y. Curr. Sci. 2001, 81, 1043.
(11) Sun, H.; Martin, C.; Kesselring, D.; Keller, R.; Moeller, K. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 13761.
(12) For a preparative-scale, CAN-mediated oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons
in aqueous HNO3/hydrocarbon solvent emulsions containing a phase-transfer
agent or tetrabutylammonium salt, see: Pletcher, D.; Valdes, E. M.
Electrochim. Acta 1988, 33, 509.
(13) To date, the direct electrolysis of any substrate attached to the agarose
polymer coating the microelectrode array has not been observed.
Figure 1. Site-selective Ce(IV) oxidation reactions. (a) Site-selective pattern
on a 1K microelectrode array. (b) Site-selective pattern on a 12K array.
JA804661H
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 34, 2008 11291