S. Fletcher, P. T. Gunning / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 4817–4819
4819
Table 4
acidity of the conjugate acid (decreasing pKaH) of the ortho-elec-
tron-withdrawing substituent.15 There appears to be an optimal
pKaH of around À8.5, that is exhibited by carboxylic esters, which
lead to the fastest rate of debenzylation with TFA. In an approxi-
mate bell-shaped distribution of reaction rate versus ortho-substi-
tuent pKaH—that was interrupted only by ortho-cyanophenol
6p—protonatable groups with pKaH’s <À8.5 or >À8.5 were less
effective at accelerating the TFA-mediated debenzylation. These
data concur with our chelation hypothesis: groups that are too ba-
sic bind more strongly to the TFA proton making it less available for
sharing with, and ultimately releasing to, the phenol ether oxygen;
groups that are weakly basic do not bind the TFA proton as well,
leading to reduced chelation and hence less rate enhancement.
The anomalous result for ortho-cyanophenol 6p was anticipated
since this compound was selected as a negative control. Phenol
6p is geometrically incapable of chelating a proton, because the lin-
ear, sp-hybridized nitrile functionality directs its basic nitrogen
atom (pKaH ꢀ À10) away from the phenol oxygen. As predicted,
there was no rate enhancement for the TFA-mediated debenzyla-
tion of 6p relative to phenol 6l. In fact, 6p was only slowly deben-
zylated, at a rate that was comparable with the m-nitro and
p-nitro derivatives 6g and 6h, respectively.
We next wanted to investigate the selectivity for the deprotec-
tion of the benzyl group over other phenol protecting groups.
Accordingly, the benzyl group in salicylate derivative 9a was varied
with para-methoxybenzyl (PMB; 9b), methyl (9c), allyl (9d) and
iso-propyl (i-Pr; 9e). These substrates were then debenzylated with
a 1:1 mixture of TFA/toluene; our findings are reported in Table 3.
Any impurities this time were minor and readily separable from
the products, eliminating the need for the additive thioanisole.
The relative rates at which these protecting groups were removed
was para-methoxybenzyl > benzyl > allyl > iso-propyl ꢁ methyl,
which reflects the stability of the carbocations. These data suggest
that in salicylates such as 9, the benzyl phenol protecting group
(R = Bn) can be removed with TFA in the presence of the corres-
ponding allyl, iso-propyl and methyl ethers.
Selectivity investigation into the TFA-mediated debenzylation of aryl benzyl ethersa
OBn
OH
TFA
CO2Bn
CO2Bn
toluene
R
R
11
12
Substrate
R
Yieldb (%)
6dc
11a
11b
11cd
H
93
92
93
54
NHAc
NHCbz
NHBoc
a
The reaction was carried out with 11 (0.5 mmol) in a 1:1 mixture of TFA/toluene
(5 ml) at rt for 5 min, then all solvents were evaporated.
b
Isolated yield after silica gel flash column chromatography.
For compound 6d, 3 equiv of thioanisole were also used.
After 5 min, the reaction mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 and then immedi-
c
d
ately neutralized with 1 M NaOH. The organic layer was then separated and
evaporated.
In summary, we have presented the mild, efficient and rapid
deblocking of ortho-substituted aryl benzyl ethers with TFA. Deb-
enzylation was fastest when the ortho group was a carboxylic ester,
which we have attributed to a proton chelation effect. Other ortho
groups that accelerated the TFA-mediated debenzylation included
carboxylic acid, aldehyde and nitro. In addition, we have shown
that in such ortho-functionalized phenols, benzyl could be
removed in the presence of the corresponding iso-propyl, allyl
and methyl ethers. Moreover, the benzyl ether could be selectively
cleaved in the presence of benzyl ester, Cbz carbamate and Boc
carbamate functionalities.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support for this
work from the Canadian Foundation of Innovation and the Univer-
sity of Toronto (Connaught Foundation).
Finally, we explored the selectivity of this mild debenzylation
technique over other benzyl-based protecting groups, as shown
in Table 4. As the results demonstrate, it was possible to deblock
the O-benzyl ether in the presence of a benzyl ester (6d) and in
the presence of a benzyl carbamate (11b), thereby increasing the
orthogonality of O-benzyl phenol ethers of salicylate derivatives.
Interestingly, it was even possible to cleave the benzyl group in
11c with TFA in the presence of an N-Boc-protected aniline.
References and notes
1. Zhang, S.; Zhang, Z.-Y. Drug Discov. Today 2007, 12, 373–381.
2. (a) Pei, Z.; Li, X.; Liu, G.; Abad-Zapatero, C.; Lubben, T.; Zhang, T.; Ballaron, S. J.;
Hutchins, C. W.; Trevillyana, J. M.; Jirouseka, M. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003,
13, 3129–3132; (b) Xin, Z.; Liu, G.; Abad-Zapatero, C.; Pei, Z.; Szczepankiewicz,
B. G.; Li, X.; Zhang, T.; Hutchins, C. W.; Hajduk, P. J.; Ballaron, S. J.; Stashko, M.
A.; Lubben, T. H.; Trevillyana, J. M.; Jirouseka, M. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2003, 13, 3947–3950.
3. Tautz, L.; Bruckner, S.; Sareth, S.; Alonso, A.; Bogetz, J.; Bottini, N.; Pellecchia,
M.; Mustelin, T. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 9400–9408.
4. Shrestha, S.; Bhattarai, B. R.; Chang, K. J.; Leea, K.-H.; Choa, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2007, 17, 2760–2764.
Table 3
TFA-mediated deprotection of O-blocked phenol ether derivatives of methyl
4-acetamidosalicylatea
NHAc
NHAc
5. Liljebris, C.; Larsen, S. D.; Ogg, D.; Palazuk, B. J.; Bleasdale, J. E. J. Med. Chem.
2002, 45, 1785–1798.
TFA
6. Siddiquee, K.; Zhang, S.; Guida, W. C.; Blaskovich, M. A.; Greedy, B.; Lawrence,
H. R.; Yip, M. L. R.; Jove, R.; Laughlin, M. M.; Lawrence, N. J.; Sebti, S. M.;
Turkson, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 7391–7396.
7. Pandey, P. N.; Purkayastha, M. L. Synthesis 1982, 876–878.
8. (a) Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.;
John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999; (b) Kocienski, P. J. Protecting Groups, 3rd
ed.; Georg Thieme: Stuttgart, Germany, 2003.
9. Kiso, Y.; Isawa, H.; Kitagawa, K.; Akita, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1978, 26, 2562–
2564.
10. Kiso, Y.; Ukawa, K.; Nakamura, S.; Ito, K.; Akita, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1980, 28,
673–676.
11. Ploypradith, P.; Cheryklin, P.; Niyomtham, N.; Bertoni, D. R.; Ruchirawat, S. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 2637–2640.
12. Marsh, J. P., Jr.; Goodman, L. J. Org. Chem. 1965, 30, 2491–2492.
13. (a) Eberle, A. N. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1986, 361–367; (b) Bodanszky, M.;
Tolle, J. C.; Deshmane, S. S.; Bodanszky, A. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1978, 12, 57–
68.
14. Haraldsson, G. G.; Baldwin, J. E. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 215–224.
15. (a) Ionization Constants of Organic Acids in Solution; Serjeant, E. P., Dempsey, B.,
Eds. IUPAC Chemical Data Series No. 23; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1979; (b)
toluene
OR
OMe
OH
OMe
O
O
9
10
Substrate
R
Timeb (h)
Yieldc (%)
9a
9b
9c
9d
9e
Bn
PMB
Me
Allyl
i-Pr
5 min
2 min
48
20
36
91
90
0d
91
92
a
The reaction was carried out with 9 (0.5 mmol) in a 1:1 mixture of TFA/toluene
(5 ml) at rt.
b
c
Time taken for all starting material to be consumed.
Isolated yield after silica gel flash column chromatography.
Only starting material remained after 48 h, at which point the reaction was
d
aborted.