Fu et al.
TABLE 1. Optimization of Conditions for Thiomethylation of 1a
with Formaldehyde and Benzylthiol 2aa
SCHEME 1
entry
catalyst
solvent
1a:HCHO:2a
yield of 3a (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
HCl
HCl
HCl
THF
THF
EtOH
AcOH
THF
1:1:1
1:2:1
1:2:1
1:2:1
1:2:1
36
97
52
83
c
-
this paper, two reactions, the [3 + 2] annulation reaction of 4
and 5 to polysubstituted furans 6 and the thiomethylation
reaction of 1 to functionalized allylic sulfides 3, are described
in detail.
a 1a (1.0 mmol), HCHO (40% aqueous), 2a (1.0 mmol), HCl (2.0
mmol, 36% aqueous), solvent (2.0 mL), rt, 0.5 h. b Isolated yields. c 24
h, no reaction.
Results and Discussion
bromide,14e etc., have been developed, to our knowledge, none
of them12-14 involved a Mannich-type thiomethylation15 of
activated alkenes, a simple method leading directly to allylic
sulfides with water as the only byproduct. In fact, in the three-
component thiomethylation reaction involving a nucleophile,
formaldehyde, and a thiol, various carbon nucleophiles (such
as ketones, nitroalkanes, phenols, aromatic amines, electron-
rich heterocyclic compounds, or even ferrocene) and heteroatom
nucleophiles (including nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, phosphorus,
or halogens) have been proven to be effective.15 However, the
investigation of taking activated alkenes as carbon nucleophiles
in thiomethylation has been scarce. Kirk16a and Cohen16b
reported that the formal thiomethylated products of activated
alkenes could be achieved, for example, by refluxing a mixture
of cyclopent-2-enone, formaldehyde, and thiophenol in the
presence of triethylamine for 4 days to afford 2-(phenylthiom-
ethyl)cyclopent-2-enone in 73% yield. But the reaction was
proved to proceed in a non-Mannich-type process in which the
corresponding thia-Michael adduct, 3-(phenylthio)cyclopen-
tanone, was obtained as the intermediate.16b
As part of our research to assess R-EWG ketene-S,S-acetals
1 as activated alkenes in the C-C bond forming reactions with
carbon electrophiles,8 we showed that the R-carbon atom of 1
has high nucleophilicity. Encouraged by these results and the
foreseeable possibility of the thiomethylation based on R-EWG
ketene-S,S-acetals, we decided to investigate the thiomethylation
reaction of these activated alkenes with formaldehyde and thiols
under acidic conditions. Thus, hydrochloric acid (2.0 mmol, 36%
aqueous) was initially evaluated in the model reaction of 1-(1,3-
dithiolan-2-ylidene)propan-2-one 1a (1.0 mmol) with benzylthiol
2a (1.0 mmol) and formaldehyde (1.0 mmol, 40% aqueous) in
THF (2.0 mL). As depicted in Table 1, the reaction could furnish
the thiomethylated product, 4-(benzylthio)-3-(1,3-dithiolan-2-
ylidene)butan-2-one 3a, as a white solid in 36% isolated yield
after reacting for 0.5 h (Table 1, entry 1). Notably, a 2-fold
excess of formaldehyde could dramatically increase the yield
of 3a to 97% under identical conditions (entry 2). Compara-
tively, ethanol was an unfavorable solvent for this process (entry
Preparation of Starting Materials. According to the pro-
cedure reported previously,11 R-EWG ketene-S,S-acetals 1a-h
were conveniently prepared by a two-step process involving the
preparation of R-EWG R-acetyl ketene-S,S-acetals starting from
the corresponding ꢀ-dicarbonyl compounds, carbon disulfide,
and alkyl halides in the presence of K2CO3 catalyzed by
tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB) in water and the sequen-
tial acid-promoted deacylation, respectively.
Synthesis of r-EWG-r′-alkyl/arylthiomethyl Ketene-S,S-
acetals 3 via Thiomethylation of r-EWG Ketene-S,S-acetals
1. For the preparation of synthetically useful allylic sulfides,12,13
although some elegant methods, such as transition metal
catalyzed alkylation of thiols,14a-c allylation of diorganodisul-
fides with allyl halides,14d or indium-promoted one-pot reaction
of Baylis-Hillman acetates, sodium thiosulfate, and allyl
(6) For selected examples, see: (a) Dong, D.; Bi, X.; Liu, Q.; Cong, F. Chem.
Commun. 2005, 3580–3582. (b) Bi, X.; Dong, D.; Li, Y.; Liu, Q. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 10886–10889. (c) Zhao, L.; Liang, F.; Bi, X.; Sun, S.; Liu, Q. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 1094–1098. (d) Hu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Yuan, H.; Liu, Q. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 2442–2445. (e) Li, Y.; Liang, F.; Bi, X.; Liu, Q. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 8006–8010. (f) Bi, X.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Q.; Tan, J.; Li, B. AdV. Synth.
Catal. 2007, 349, 2301–2306. (g) Liang, F.; Li, D.; Zhang, L.; Gao, J.; Liu, Q.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4845–4848. (h) Chen, L.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Liu, Q.; Cheng, C.;
Piao, C.-R. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 9259–9263. (i) Liang, F.; Zhang, J.; Tan,
J.; Liu, Q. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 1986–1990. (j) Liu, J.; Wang, M.; Li,
B.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4401–4405. (k) Sun, S.; Wang,
M.; Deng, H.; Liu, Q. Synthesis 2008, 573–583.
(7) (a) Peruncheralathan, S.; Khan, T. A.; Ila, H.; Junjappa, H. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 10030–10035. (b) Panda, K.; Suresh, J. R.; Ila, H.; Junjappa, H. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3498–3506.
(8) (a) Yin, Y.; Wang, M.; Liu, Q.; Hu, J.; Sun, S.; Kang, J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 4399–4402. (b) Sun, S.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Q.; Kang, J.; Yin, Y.;
Li, D.; Dong, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6271–6274. (c) Pan, W.; Dong,
D.; Sun, S; Liu, Q. Synlett 2006, 1090–1094. (d) Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Wang, M.;
Liu, Q; Hu, J.; Yin, Y. Synthesis 2006, 3009–3014. (e) Yin, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Li,
J.; Sun, S.; Liu, Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 6071–6074.
(9) (a) Rao, H. S. P.; Sivakumar, S. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8715–8723. (b)
Anabha, E. R.; Asokan, C. V. A. Synthesis 2006, 151–155.
(10) (a) Wang, M.; Xu, X. X.; Liu, Q.; Xiong, L.; Yang, B.; Gao, L. Synth.
Commun. 2002, 32, 3437–3443. (b) Zhao, Y.-L.; Liu, Q.; Sun, R.; Zhang, Q.;
Xu, X. X. Synth. Commun. 2004, 34, 463–469.
(11) (a) Dong, D.; Ouyang, Y.; Yu, H.; Liang, Y.; Liu, Q. AdV. Synth. Catal.
2006, 348, 206–210. (b) Yu, H.; Dong, D.; Ouyang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Y. Lett.
Org. Chem. 2005, 2, 755–759.
(12) For reviews, see: (a) Li, A.-H.; Dai, L.-X.; Aggarwal, V. K. Chem.
ReV. 1997, 97, 2341–2372. (b) Castro, A. M. M. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 2939–
3002. (c) Bur, S. K. Top. Curr. Chem. 2007, 274, 125–171.
(14) For selected examples, see: (a) Goux, C.; Lhoste, P.; Sinou, D.
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 10321–10330. (b) Kondo, T.; Morisaki, Y.; Uenoyama,
S.; Wada, K.; Mitsudo, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8657–8658. (c) Gais,
H.-J.; Jagusch, T.; Spalthoff, N.; Gerhards, F.; Frank, M.; Raabe, G. Chem. Eur.
J. 2003, 9, 4202–4221. (d) Sinha, P.; Kundu, A.; Roy, S.; Prabhakar, S.;
Vairamani, M.; Sankar, A. R.; Kunwar, A. C. Organometallics 2001, 20, 157–
162. (e) Liu, Y.; Xu, X.; Zheng, H.; Xu, D.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, Y. Synlett 2006,
571–574.
¨
(13) (a) Nubbemeyer, U.; Ohrlein, R.; Gonda, J.; Ernst, B.; Bellusˇ, D. Angew.
Chem. In. Ed. 1991, 30, 1465–1467. (b) Kan, T.; Nara, S.; Ito, S.; Matsuda, F.;
Shirahama, H. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5111–5113. (c) Carter, D. S.; Van
Vranken, D. L. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1303–1305. (d) Kato, Y.; Miki, K.; Nishino,
F.; Ohe, K.; Uemura, S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2619–2621. (e) Hua, R.; Takeda,
H.; Onozawa, S.-Y.; Abe, Y.; Tanaka, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 263–266.
7626 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 19, 2008