of the aldehyde substrate for the addition to ꢀ-nitrostyrene.6
Then, the group of Wennemers described a tripeptide as a
very efficient organocatalyst for this reaction (1 mol %).7
Finally (a more simple molecule) diphenylprolinol silyl ether
(0.5-2 mol %), turned out to be highly effective in water.8
Among all nitroolefins, ꢀ-nitrostyrenes are the most widely
used because of their possible conversion into useful
compounds such as substituted pyrrolidines5a,g or γ-butyro-
lactones.6 Nevertheless, other nitroolefins have also been used
in synthesis, for instance (-)-Botryodiplodin9 and potent H3
agonist Sch50917.10 Moreover, fonctionalized nitroolefins
such as ꢀ-nitroacroleine dimethyl acetal11 and 3-nitroacry-
late8 have also been tested in asymmetric organocatalyzed
conjugate addition. Herein, we report the organocatalyzed
conjugate addition of aldehydes 1 to nitrodienes 2. The
Michael addition of 10 equiv of isovaleraldehyde 1a to
phenylnitrodiene 2a in the presence of 20 mol % of
organocatalyst was selected as the model reaction. Thus, (S)-
diphenylprolinol silyl ether 3 appeared to be the best
organocatalyst in terms of diastereo- and enantioselectivities
(see Supporting Information).
Table 1. Solvent’s Optimization
drb
entry
solvent
CHCl3
time
yielda (syn/ anti)
eec
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
24 h
24 h
2 days
14 h
91
95
87
89
97
78
88
87
88/12
92/8
87/13
92/8
92/8
80/20
92/8
>99
>99
99
>99
>99
97
CH2Cl2
neat
beerd
H2O/EtOH 5% v/v 14 h
winee
H2O
20 h
14 h
50 h
98
88
EtOH
65/35
a Yield of isolated product after flash column chromatography on SiO2.
b Determined by 1H NMR or chiral SFC of crude product. c Determined by
chiral SFC on the syn adduct. d Heineken. e White wine of Jura, France.
Surprisingly, no trace of 1,6-addition adduct has ever been
observed during the preliminary optimization study. Only
1,4-addition occurred with perfect control of the regioselec-
tivity for the adduct 4a. Furthermore, the water and ethanol
5% v/v system was proved to be the most suitable solvent
for our mode reaction (Table 1, entry 5). Beer also gave the
same results with a diastereoselectivity of 92/8 in favor of
the syn adduct and a perfect enantioselectivity (Table 1, entry
6). Dichloromethane gave similar results, but the reaction
time was longer (Table 1, entry 2). Choloroform and neat
conditions led also to excellent enantioselectivity but lower
diastereoselectivity (Table 1, entry 1 and 3). A decrease of
both diastereo- and enantioselectivities has also been ob-
served when beer was replaced by wine to increase the
alcohol proof (Table 1, entry 6). Subsequently, moderate
results were obtained when the reaction was performed in
ethanol as the solvent (Table 1, entry 8), whereas water
showed to be as suitable as the water and ethanol 5% v/v
system, though isolated yields are slightly lower (Table 1,
entry 7). Moreover, a slight amount of ethanol appeared to
be useful in some cases to solubilize the starting materials.
Further studies showed also that it was possible to decrease
both the quantity of aldehyde 1a (2 equiv) and the amount
of (S)-diphenylprolinol silyl ether 3 (5 mol %) (see Sup-
porting Information). No changes in term of reaction time
or enantioselectivity were observed, only a slight improve-
ment for the diastereoselectivity, since these conditions
afforded the expected product within the same reaction time,
the same enantioselectivity, and a slight improvement of
diastereoselectivity (Table 2, entry 1). With these new
Table 2. Scope of the Reaction: Aldehydes 1a-f
entry
R1
R2
time
yielda (%) drb (syn/anti) eec (%)
1
2
3
iPr
Me
nPr
allyl
Me
H
H
H
H
14 h
10 h
10 h
36 h
4a: 91
4b: 81
4c: 91
4d: 84
4e: 72
4f: 78
94/6
80/20
93/7
52/48
-
>99
96
99
93
68
4
5d
6
Me 5 days
Ph 4 days
Me
95/5
16
a Yield of isolated product after flash column chromatography on SiO2.
b Determined by 1H NMR or chiral SFC of crude product. c Determined by
chiral SFC on the syn adduct. d 10 mol % of catalyst.
optimized conditions in hand, we investigated the scope and
limitations of this reaction by testing phenylnitrodiene 2a
with a variety of aldehydes 1a-f (Table 2).
Thus, unbranched aldehydes such as propionaldehyde 1b,
pentanal 1c, and penten-4-al 1d underwent the 1,4-addition
in excellent yield and excellent enantioselectivities (Table
2, entries 2-4). On the other hand, R-branched aldehydes,
isobutyraldehyde 1e, and 2-phenylpropanal 1f led to good
isolated yield but moderate enantiocontrol (Table 2, entries
5 and 6). It is also interesting to notice that among
unbranched aldehydes, only penten-4-al 1d gave no diaste-
reoselectivity (Table 2, entry 4). We then continued to
evaluate the scope of the reaction by testing the Michael
addition of isovaleraldehyde 1a to various nitrodienes 2a-e
(6) Palomo, C.; Vera, S.; Mielgo, A.; Gomez-Bengoa, E. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed 2006, 45, 5984.
(7) Wiesner, M.; Revell, J. F.; Wennemers, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 1871.
(8) Zhu, S.; Yu, S.; Ma, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 545.
(9) Andrey, O.; Vidonne, A.; Alexakis, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
7901.
(10) Aslanian, R.; Lee, G.; Iyer, R. V.; Shih, N.-Y.; Piwinski, J. J.;
Draper, R. W.; McPhail, A. T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 3867.
(11) Reyes, E.; Vicario, J. L.; Bad´ıa, D.; Carillo, L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
6135.
4558
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 20, 2008