T. Yoon et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 4486–4490
4489
Table 6
Pharmacokinetic profiles of 1, 5g, and 12b in Sprague–Dawley rats (20 mg/kg po and 3 mg/kg iv)
Compound
Solubility (
l
g/mL)a
F (%)
Cmax (ng/mL)
Tmax (h)
T1/2 (h)
Cl (mL/min/kg)
Vd (L/kg)
1
5g
12b
<0.5
27
28
5
2
6
387
210
194
0.7
0.6
1.8
5.4
2.8
8.3
14.5
21
13.6
13
12
14
a
Determined in 0.1 N HCl.
The CRF-1 receptor binding affinities of these 6-substituted ana-
logues are summarized in Table 2. A small increase in chain size
(8a) afforded a compound of similar potency to 5a but further in-
creases in chain length (8b) led to a decrease in affinity. The intro-
duction of secondary (8c) and tertiary (8d) alcohol functionality
resulted in a decrease in activity.
important to determine the functional activity of these compounds
at the CRF-1 receptor. Compounds 5a, 12a, and 12b were found to
inhibit sauvagine-stimulated cAMP accumulation in AtT20 cells
expressing the CRF-1 receptor18 with IC50s that correlated well
with binding affinity, thereby supporting that these compounds
are indeed functional antagonists at the CRF-1 receptor.
A number of substituted 2-aryl analogues of the 4-methoxypyr-
imidines were prepared (Schemes 2 and 5a–g) and their CRF-1
receptor binding affinities are shown in Table 3. To achieve maxi-
mal CRF-1 binding affinity in the isoquinoline10 series a 2,4,6-tri-
substitution on the aryl ring was required. This also proved to be
the case in the pyrimidine series.16 Replacing the 2-methoxy-4,6-
dimethylphenyl (5a, Ki = 15 nM) by 2,4-dichlorophenyl (5b) led
to a complete loss in activity. Likewise, only modest affinity was
found for the 2,4- and 2,6-dimethoxyphenyl analogues (5c and
5d). Reverting to 2,4,6-trisubstitution and replacing the 2-methoxy
group of 5a with methyl (5e, Ki = 354 nM) resulted in a consider-
able loss in affinity, underscoring the importance of the 2-methoxy
substituent in this series. Reintroduction of the 2-methoxy and
replacement of both methyl groups with trifluoromethyl groups
gave an increase in affinity (5f, Ki = 6 nM) but also lipophilicity
(cLogP = 7.7). In an attempt to increase the hydrophilicity, while
retaining the potency of 5f, the trifluoromethyl groups were re-
placed by less lipophilic substituents such as a second ortho-meth-
oxy and a para-chloro. The resulting compound, 5g, had excellent
CRF-1 receptor binding affinity (Ki = 2 nM) and lower lipophilicity
(cLogP = 5.9).
The pharmacokinetic properties of the 5-aminoalkyl pyrimidine
5g and the 5-alkoxy analogue 12b were examined (Table 6). Disap-
pointingly, despite lower lipophilicity and increased solubility rel-
ative to the isoquinoline 1, both 5g and 12b exhibited moderate
oral exposure in rats. The low-to-moderate clearance values sug-
gest that the poor exposure was not due to metabolic liabilities,
leaving limited absorption as a potential culprit.
In summary, we have described our efforts to overcome the lia-
bilities of our recently described series of isoquinolines (e.g., 1) as
CRF-1 receptor antagonists. Their poor physicochemical properties
(high lipophilicity, cLogP > 7) contributed to unacceptable pharma-
cokinetic profiles. Our strategy to increase hydrophilicity invoked
the replacement of the bicyclic quinoline with a less lipophilic,
monocyclic pyrimidine core (DcLogP = 1.9 between these two
cores). Optimization of this new series with regard to CRF-1 recep-
tor binding affinity and reduced lipophilicity led to the identifica-
tion of compounds with Ki values below 10 nM and lipophilicity
in a minimally acceptable range for a CNS drug (cLogP < 5). How-
ever, the improvements in lipophilicity within this series did not
translate into increased oral bioavailability, therefore hindering
the progression of these otherwise potent antagonists. The results
of our efforts to resolve these issues will be reported in due course.
A limited number of secondary amines were also investigated at
the 5-position. The 5-aminopyrimidine 9 was converted to the cor-
responding 5-iodopyrimidine and subsequent Buchwald amination
gave the 5-aminopyrimidines 10a–c in low yields (Scheme 4).
The modifications to the 5-position are summarized in Table 4.
A complete loss in activity was observed following removal of a
References and notes
1. Vale, W.; Spiess, J.; Rivier, C.; Rivier, J. Science 1981, 213, 1394.
2. Spiess, J.; Dautzenberg, F. M.; Sydow, S.; Hauger, R. L.; Ruhmann, A.; Blank, T.;
Radulovic, J. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 1998, 9, 140.
propyl group (10a) although
a-branching (e.g., 3-pentyl amine
3. (a) Holsboer, F.; Ising, M. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 583, 350; (b) Ising, M.;
Zimmermann, U. S.; Kuenzel, H. E.; Uhr, M.; Foster, A. C.; Learned-Coughlin, S. M.;
Holsboer, F.; Grigoriadis, D. E. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007, 32, 1941; (c)
Zoumakis, E.; Rice, K. C.; Gold, P. W.; Chrousos, G. P.Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2006, 1083,
239; (d) Holsboer, F. J. Psychiatr. Res. 1999, 33, 181; (e) Bale, T. L.; Vale, W. V. Annu.
Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2004, 44, 525; (f) Chalmers, D. T.; Lovenberg, T. W.;
Grigoriadis, D. E.; Behan, D. P.; De Souza, E. B. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1996, 17, 166;
(g) Lovenberg, T. W.; Liaw, C. W.;Grigoriadis, D. E.; Clevenger, W.;Chalmers, D. T.;
De Souza, E. B.; Oltersdorf, T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 836.
4. (a) Chen, Y. L.; Mansbach, R. S.; Winter, S. M.; Brooks, E.; Collins, J.; Corman, M.
L.; Dunaiskis, A. R.; Faraci, W. S.; Gallaschun, R. J.; Schmidt, A.; Schulz, D. W. J.
Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 1749; (b) Schultz, W. D.; Mansbach, R. S.; Sprouse, J.;
Braselton, J. P.; Collins, J.; Corman, M.; Tingley, F. D., III; Winston, E. N.; Chen, Y.
L.; Heym, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 10477.
5. Griebel, G.; Simiand, J.; Steinberg, R.; Jung, M.; Gully, D.; Roger, P.; Geslin, M.;
Scatton, B.; Maffrand, J.-P. ; Soubrie, P. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 301, 333.
6. For reviews see: (a) Chen, C. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 1261; (b) Gilligan, P. J.;
Li, Y.-W. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev. 2004, 7, 487; (c) Kehne, J.; De Lombaert,
S. Curr. Drug Targets CNS & Neurol. Disord. 2002, 1, 467; (d) Gilligan, P. J.;
Robertson, D. W.; Zaczek, R. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 1641.
10b) recovered activity (Ki = 94 nM). Increasing the steric bulk
(10c), however, brought about a complete loss in binding.
The conformational control enabled by adjacent lone pair repul-
sions can be taken advantage of further by replacing the 5-amino-
alkyl group with an
a-branched alkyl ether. The calculated
minimum energy conformation of a representative (e.g., 12a,
Fig. 4) indicates that the combination of lone pair and steric inter-
actions may place the alkyl chain in the desired lipophilic pocket.
The 5-(3-pentyloxy) analogues 12a–c were prepared as out-
lined in Scheme 5. Mitsunobu reaction of the known pyrimidine
1117 with propan-3-ol and subsequent Suzuki coupling with a
2,4,6-trisubstituted aryl boronic acid gave the desired 2-aryl-5-alk-
oxypyrimidines 12a–c in modest overall yields.
The binding affinities of the 5-(3-pentyloxy) analogues 12a–c
are summarized in Table 5. The 2-methoxy-4,6-dimethylphenyl
analogue 12a displayed excellent affinity (Ki = 8 nM), compared
to the corresponding 3-pentyl amine 10b (Ki = 94 nM), and signif-
icantly less lipophilicity than compounds of similar activity in
the parent isoquinoline series, such as 1. The effects of a second
ortho-methoxy substituent on the aryl ring were then investigated
and the 2,6-dimethoxy-4-chloro analogue 12b and the 4-difluoro-
methyl analogue 12c had similar affinities to 12a but also a re-
duced lipophilicity (cLogP 6 5). At this point, it became
7. (a) He, L.; Gilligan, P. J.; Zaczek, R.; Fitzgerald, L. W.; McElroy, J.; Shen, H. S.;
Saye, J. A.; Kalin, N. H.; Shelton, S.; Christ, D.; Trainor, G.; Hartig, P. J. Med. Chem.
2000, 43, 449; (b) Li, Y.-W.
; Hill, G.; Wong, H.; Kelly, N.; Ward, K.;
Pierdomenico, M.; Ren, S.; Gilligan, P. J.; Grossman, S.; Trainor, G.; Taub, R.;
McElroy, J.; Zaczek, R. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2003, 305, 86.
8. (a) Chen, C.; Wilcoxen, K. M.; Huang, C. Q.; Xie, Y. F.; McCarthy, J. R.; Webb, T.
R.; Zhu, Y.-F. ; Saunders, J.; Liu, X. J.; Chen, T. K.; Bozigian, H.; Grigoriadis, D. E. J.
Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 4787; (b) Gehlert, D. R.; Cippitelli, A.; Thorsell, A.; Le, Anh
D.; Hipskind, P. A.; Hamdouchi, C.; Lu, J.; Hembre, E. J.; Cramer, J.; Song, M.;
McKinzie, D.; Morin, M.; Ciccocioppo, R.; Heilig, M. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27,
2718.