carried out DFT9,10 calculations on the process indicated in
Figure 1. This transformation corresponds to the C-C bond
thetical biradical character. Our results indicated that the
electronic structure of INT1 is closed shell in nature. For
instance, the natural occupancies of the four active MOs of
the CASSCF(8,10) calculation were 1.945, 1.964, 1.969, and
1.944. In addition, the triplet state was found to be 32.1 kcal/
mol higher in energy than the singlet. These results indicate
that the more basic nitrogen atom of the iminic moiety in
INT1 does not favor the stabilization of biradicals.
We also located and characterized two different saddle
points associated with the transformation depicted in Figure
1. For this model system TS2, which has a boat conforma-
tion, is more stable than the sofa transition structure TS1.
CASSCF(8,10) single point calculations on both transition
structures also resulted in closed shell electronic structures.
The intermediate product of this C-C bond forming step is
INT2, whose intramolecular cyclization must yield the
correponding cyclic amide, as is shown in Scheme 1.
Figure 1. Transition structures TS1 and TS2 associated with the
C-C bond forming step of the reaction of complex INT1. Energies
include zero-point vibrational energy (ZPVE) corrections and have
been calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G*&LANL2DZ level. Numbers
in parentheses correspond to the relative energy differences.
forming step in the reaction between glutaconic anhydride
and methanimine.
Many mechanistic studies dealing with the TiCl4/amine
system assume that the active enolates are neutral
(CdC-OTiCl3) species11 and/or anionic (CdC-OTiCl4 )
-
complexes.12 A recent paper13 has reported the presence of
-
anionic titanium enolate complexes (CdC-OTiCl4 ) in
which the most stable form has significant biradical character.
The corresponding triplet species was characterized by
electron paramagnetic resonance. We carried out single point
calculations on the optimized structure of INT1 at the
CASSCF(4,4) and CASSCF(8,10) levels to assess its hypo-
Figure 2. Transition structures TS1a and TS2a associated with
the C-C bond forming step leading to cis- and trans-3e from 1
and imine 2e. See the caption of Figure 1 for additional details.
(9) Density-functional theory (DFT) calculations were carried out using
the B3LYP hybrid functional. See: (a) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993,
98, 5648. (b) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1998, 37, 785.
(c) Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200. The
6-31G* basis set was used for all atoms except for titanium, which was
computed using the LANL2DZ effective core potential and basis set. See:
The anionic routes shown in Figure 2 were also explored.
This second reaction corresponds to the first step in the
reaction between 1 and (E)-2e. In this case, saddle point TS3,
which has a sofa conformation and leads to trans-3e, was
found to be more stable than TS4, because of the larger steric
demand between one chlorine atom of the octahedral
environment of the titanium and the phenyl group of the
imine. Because TS4 leads to the formation of cis-3e, the
trans- stereochemical control in this Perkin-Mannich route
stems from the lower energy of transition structures similar
to TS3.
(d) Hay, P. J.; Wadt, W. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 299
.
(10) All the calculations reported in this work were carried out using
the Gaussian03 (Rev. D.02) suite of programs: Frisch, M. J. Gaussian03,
revision D.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004 (full reference is given
in the Supporting Information)
.
(11) (a) Barraga´n, E.; Olivo, H. F.; Romero-Ortega, M.; Sarduy, S. J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4214. (b) Itoh, Y.; Yamanaka, M.; Mikami, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13174. (c) Ambhaikar, N. B.; Snyder, J. P.; Hotta,
D. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3699. (d) Pinheiro, S.; Greco, S. J.;
Veiga, L. S.; de Farias, F. M. C.; Costa, P. R. R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2002, 13, 1157.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 21, 2008
4761