reduction sequence,5 and our plans for subunit coupling involved
the use of Carreira’s asymmetric alkynylation6 and Fu’s recently
described alkyl-alkyl Suzuki coupling.7
diastereoisomer (>20:1 by H NMR analysis). This three-
1
step sequence conveniently provided the desired pyran in
33% overall yield. Hydrogenation of the enone, followed
by reduction of the ketone with L-Selectride gave axial
alcohol 9 in 86% yield (two steps). Protection of the
secondary alcohol as the TBS ether, removal of the benzyl
ether (88% yield, two steps), and oxidation with Dess-Martin
periodinane led to aldehyde 2 (99% yield). Reaction with
known alkyne 311 under Carreira’s asymmetric alkynylation
conditions (Et3N, Zn(OTf)2, (-)-NME, PhMe) and subse-
quent protection of the secondary alcohol as the TBS ether
gave 10 (82% yield over two steps).
The synthesis of the tetahydropyran-containing domain
commenced with commercially available furan 58 (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the C7-C32 Pyran-Containing Domain
The synthesis of butenolide 4 began with the alkylation of
alkyne 1112 with epoxide 1213 in the presence of BF3·OEt2,
followed by immediate protection of the homopropargyl alcohol
with TBDSPCl to give 13 in 88% yield (Scheme 2). Careful
removal of the TBS ether with ethanolic PPTS (95% yield)
and hydroalumination-iodination of the alkyne following
Denmark’s procedure14 produced vinyl iodide 14 in 90% yield.
In accord with Stille’s original report15 and Hoye’s application
in the context of acetogenin synthesis,16 when 14 was subjected
to Pd(0) under 50 psi CO, carbonylative lactonization occurred
to yield the desired butenolide 15 in 90% yield. Oxidative
removal of the PMB ether with DDQ in wet CH2Cl2 (82%
yield) unveiled primary alcohol 16. Conversion of the alcohol
to the bromide 4 was readily achieved by Hannesian’s NBS-
Ph3P protocol17 in 87% yield.
With routes to 10 and 4 secured we were positioned to
examine the proposed Fu-type Suzuki coupling for subunit
union (Scheme 2).18 To this end, when 10 was treated with 1.1
equiv of freshly prepared 9-BBN in THF at room temperature,
hydroboration was selective for the terminal alkene over the
internal alkyne19 to yield intermediate borane 17. When this
borane was exposed to bromide 4, Pd(PCy3)2 and K3PO4·H2O
smooth cross-coupling ensued to yield the desired compound
18 in 60% yield. In our hands, this coupling was robust with
20 mol % Pd(PCy3)2 catalyst loading and 1.2 equiv of bromide
4. In the current example, deviation from these conditions
resulted in decreased and variable yields of the desired
compound. The synthesis was then completed in a straightfor-
ward fashion by removal of the silyl protecting groups with
aqueous HF in acetonitrile (92% yield), and reduction of the
alkyne to the hydrocarbon using Wilkinson’s catalyst in
benzene-ethanol to produce pyranicin 1 in 89% yield. The
(9) Kobayashi, Y.; Kusakabe, M.; Kitano, Y.; Sato, F. J. Org. Chem.
1988, 53, 1586.
Addition of dodecylmagnesium bromide produced furfuryl
alcohol 6, which was subjected to the Sharpless asymmetric
kinetic resolution reported by Sato9,10 to yield the intermediate
pyranone hemiacetal 7. Immediate reduction with i-Pr3SiH
in the presence of BF3·OEt2 gave pyran 8 as a single
(10) For the CaH2/SiO2 modified conditions employed here see: (a)
Yang, Z. C.; Zhou, W. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5617. (b) Zhou, W. S.;
Lu, Z.; Wang, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 1467. (c) Wang, Z.; Zhou,
W.; Lin, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 6221.
(11) Garcia-Fandino, R.; Aldegunde, M. J.; Codesido, E. M.; Castedo,
L.; Granja, J. R. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8281.
(12) Brimble, M. A.; Bryant, C. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 2858.
(13) Marshall, J. A.; Schaaf, G.; Nolting, A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5331.
(14) (a) Chan, K.; Cohen, N.; DeNoble, J. P.; Specian, A. C.; Saucy,
G. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 3497. (b) Denmark, S. E.; Jones, T. K. J. Org.
Chem. 1982, 47, 4595.
(5) (a) Henderson, J. A.; Jackson, K. L.; Phillips, A. J. Org. Lett. 2007,
9, 5299. (b) Um, J. M.; Houk, K. N.; Phillips, A. J. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
3769. (c) See also: Nicolaou, K. C.; Frederick, M. O.; Burtoloso, A. C. B.;
Denton, R. M.; Rivas, F.; Cole, K. P.; Aversa, R. J.; Gibe, R.; Umezawa,
T.; Suzuki, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7466.
(15) Cowell, A.; Stille, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4193.
(16) Hoye, T. R.; Humpal, P. E.; Jimenez, J. I.; Mayer, M. J.; Tan, L.;
Ye, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 7517.
(6) Anand, N. K.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9687.
(7) Netherton, M. R.; Dai, C.; Neuschu¨tz, K.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 10099.
(17) Ponpipom, M. M.; Hanessian, S. Carbohydr. Res. 1971, 18, 342.
(18) For other examples of the use of this reaction in total synthesis
see: (a) Das, S.; Abraham, S.; Sinha, S. C. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2273. (b)
Keaton, K. A.; Phillips, A. J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2717.
(8) This furan is also readily prepared by benzylation of (hydroxymethyl)
furfural. See: Cottier, L.; Descotes, G.; Eymard, L.; Rapp, K. Synthesis
1995, 303.
(19) Brown, C. A.; Coleman, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 2328.
4956
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 21, 2008